고정된 트윗
Douglas F Correa
9.9K posts
@TopBlokeAlfred @Emperique_ Choosing the rock gives you what’s in the core of the earth. Choosing the shard gives you a piece of the sunbeam.
English
@Emperique_ screenshotting this 😂 I'll end up forgetting again
English
Millions must understand the ancient scrolls
Gaspafv@Gaspafv
TIP for new stw players (If you haven't reached this point yet, it might be useful in the future): Brightcore vs Sunbeam You need to understand something: Sunbeam = higher DPS, higher base damage, stronger headshots, more impact. Brightcore = faster fire rate, higher durability. It depends on you what you want to use the weapon for. I'll leave you a image so you can compare them (using my vacuum bow). Honestly, I prefer Sunbeam.
English
@Mr_Lister_tsf @Danish_SMF Oh, I’m sorry, do babies emerge using the toilet? I must’ve missed that part of human development.
We’ve outgrown the need to tell ourselves lies.
English
@DeeFeeCee @Danish_SMF 1. the pooping in diapers thing is just you
2. what's wrong with social order?
English
Atheism has no creed, no scripture, no rituals, no leaders, no punishments for disbelief.
It's simply the absence of belief in gods.
Calling it a religion is like calling 'off' a TV channel or 'bald' a hair color.
2
Matthew@becqstarforged
@Danish_SMF Atheism demands that everyone believe as it does. It's one of the more heavily evangelical religions...
English
@Mr_Lister_tsf @Danish_SMF The human psyche is predisposed for violence & pooping in diapers.
Regarding its evolutionary purpose, it’s clear that those who created/followed religions were able to enforce social order, resulting in a more tempered society. This does not mean that our leaders are god-kings.
English
@Danish_SMF the simple fact of the matte is that the human psyche is predisposed for religiosity this was naturally selected for alongside intelligence. that is because spirituality, to some degree improves genetic viability. in other words, it is functionally real.
English
@tenkidokan @Danish_SMF Are you only compelled to discuss things when the fear of eternal torment rests on your shoulders? Is the truth insufficient?
English
@Danish_SMF If what you said were true, you wouldn't be compelled to talk about it.
Placer, Caraga 🇵🇭 English
@mguybowman @Play_It_GMM Michael Sweet Broman, composer of tracks like Stairs, Why’s It Always Stairs?, Dorito on the Bathroom Floor, Subway Date, I Am The Star, & I Told You Dog! (Geromy Mix).
Can’t wait for the Illicit Smunt [Explicit] album. I still have over a decade before I’m old enough to listen.
English
rocking my Sweet and Hella swag fresh from Columbus, OH
English
@cara_pooh @JoJoFromJerz @mehdirhasan Trump could say 2+2=5, exactly like the quote, & you’d still deflect to say something about trans people.
You care more about what people choose to do with their own bodies than what the government does to the vulnerable.
English
@JoJoFromJerz @mehdirhasan You’re kidding. You libtards spent ten years not being able to define what a woman is. Saying a boy can become a girl. Confusing kids about gender. Being shit at math has literally nothing to do with that quote. 1984 is what would look like w commie style dictatorship in England
English
We’re governed by fucking morons
Aaron Rupar@atrupar
RFK Jr: "A Democratic senator claimed it's mathematically impossible to have a drug drop by 600%. I said, 'Well, if the drug was $100 and it raises to $600, that would be a 600% rise. If it drops from $600 to $100, that's a 600% savings.'" Trump: "Right"
English
@JonPatt944 @SirSicCrusader Cover your face in paint. Wrap a cloth carefully around your face. Look at the resulting face print. It’ll look nothing like the proportions in the shroud.
Even if it were real, what does it prove? That there was some dead guy! That’s not proof of resurrection!
English
English
Funny that you have images for the first two... I mean kryptonite is explicitly fictional and we know what it LOOKS like at least... but not one thing for your "empirical evidence" hmmm.
5 Solas@5Solas2
It's undeniable. They just ignore it.
English
@ThreeDog4746 @cherbpilled @SirSicCrusader 1) It’s a document from history. It is not a document that depicts accurate history. Otherwise, we’d have found evidence humans have only lived ~6000ya.
2) Witnessing proof of a deity isn’t evidence?!
3) Who says I don’t? Science is a tool, not a religion. I can believe whatever.
English
@DeeFeeCee @cherbpilled @SirSicCrusader 1. The Bible is historical documents, try not to be blinded from that
2. That's not scientific evidence.
3. I'm sorry you don't think anyone has value because you require the value to be scientifically repeatable when it's illogical to require that.
English
@ThreeDog4746 @cherbpilled @SirSicCrusader 1) What evidence? The Bible?
2) It would be pretty straightforward if God actually intervened. He supposedly appeared as a pillar of fire to unrepentant Israelites, but doesn’t care to do anything today.
3) Cool? That doesn’t mean it’s true.
English
@cherbpilled @SirSicCrusader 1. Jesus has evidence for resurrection. Muhammad has evidence of lies. Buddhism (the best way I can put) is simply philosophy with no evidence.
2. How do you scientifically prove God or a miracle of God?
3. Science doesn't objectively give people value when we clearly do.
English
@JonPatt944 @SirSicCrusader So you have a fabricated shroud from centuries later that doesn’t even match proper proportions if laid on a real human face, & that’s supposed to prove anything other than the fact that there was a dead guy?
English
@SirSicCrusader Not one thing?
CatholicVote@CatholicVote
HOLY SMOKES. Italian physicist Paolo Di Lazzaro spent five years trying to reproduce the body image seen on the Shroud of Turin—and couldn’t. Using intense UV light, his team was able to create small areas of discoloration on linen, but recreating the full image proved impossible with modern technology. According to biblical scholar Jeremiah Johnston, Di Lazzaro estimated the process would require an extraordinary burst of energy: "Paolo told me it would take 34,000 billion watts of energy traveling in one 40th of a billionth of a second to change the chemical makeup of a fine linen shroud to leave that image... 'We don't have that power on Earth.'" "There was a chemical change to the shroud that if it had lasted longer than one 40th of a billionth of a second, it would've scorched." This is incredible.
English
@DeeFeeCee @ArchTheAtheist You are using dead scientific theorums. You're a fucking idiot trying to save face. I just got bored of humoring you and turned up the difficulty a notch. You failed and failed.
English
If you can’t understand “why” a society objects to murder without thinking a god told you not to,,,
,,, you are “fucking psychotic”
Please leave
Scott Roberts@ScottRoberts
If there is no God, there is no objective morality. There is only preference. Your preference against murder is no more valid than a murderer's preference for it. Atheism cannot answer the "why" of morality. Only God can.
English
@JustaLlama88 @ArchTheAtheist When didn’t it exist? Tell me the exact moment when that statement was true.
You don’t see to grasp that there cannot be any time before time existed, because without time, there is no “before” or “after.”
English
@DeeFeeCee @ArchTheAtheist Yet time was created. As it didnt exist. Then it did. Sooooo
English
@JustaLlama88 @ArchTheAtheist Physics is a field. ST is a theory. In any case, I don’t see how saying “the geometry & history of the universe prevents information about the state before the beginning from being known” spits in the face of ST.
Not that string theory is even the consensus among astrophysicists.
English
@DeeFeeCee @ArchTheAtheist String theory isnt a field of science? Oh come on. It's theoretical physics
English
@JustaLlama88 @ArchTheAtheist Ok, dude. You’re clearly arguing from an emotional place & not a logical one. Because saying the most supported theories in cosmology are “mostly rejected” is just silly. How can they be mostly rejected if they’re the most supported theories? You’re just saying things.
English
@DeeFeeCee @ArchTheAtheist Your best theories are mostly rejected
English
@JustaLlama88 @ArchTheAtheist How can time be created? You can’t just go “welp, time to make time.” By definition, there is no point in time in which time did not exist.
So no, time did not have to be created, because the idea of creating time is nonsensical.
English
@DeeFeeCee @ArchTheAtheist You didn't use the fallacy right. You're a ficking idiot. Given time had.to be created we absolutely need a reason why it is not nonsensical. Your circular argument of energy creating itself is
English
@JustaLlama88 @ArchTheAtheist Laws of logic? Ok, what created God?
English
@DeeFeeCee @ArchTheAtheist Yes. Yes you do. No respected science even agrees with you. Because something had to create them due to the laws of logic. You cant account for it.
English
@JustaLlama88 @ArchTheAtheist Then you shouldn’t have said anything about chemicals creating chemicals. Big bang era predates chemicals & even atoms.
Your opinion on that theory isn’t particularly important to me.
English
@DeeFeeCee @ArchTheAtheist None of that is what we are talking about. Life didnt even exist yet in the frame we are arguing. And you abiogenesis theory is Swiss cheese
English