Nathan Graham

87 posts

Nathan Graham

Nathan Graham

@Graham_NJ7

PGY-3 at @UChicagoUro via @UmichMedAdmiss

가입일 Nisan 2022
203 팔로잉175 팔로워
Nathan Graham
Nathan Graham@Graham_NJ7·
Evil
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz

I am Sam Hazen, CEO of HCA Healthcare. The largest for-profit hospital system in the United States. One hundred and eighty-two hospitals. Twenty states. I oversee a spreadsheet called the chargemaster. It has 42,000 line items. Each line item is a price. The prices are not real. I need to be precise about that. They are not estimates. Not approximations. Not market rates. They are anchors. An anchor is a number you set high so that every negotiated discount feels like a victory. No relationship to cost. No relationship to value. A relationship to leverage. My team sets the anchors. That is the job. The price is correct. Take a drug. Keytruda. Immunotherapy. Treats sixteen types of cancer. The manufacturer charges approximately $11,000 per dose. That is the acquisition cost. What the hospital pays. My team enters it into the chargemaster. They do not enter $11,000. They enter $43,000. That is the gross charge. The gross charge is a fiction. No one pays it. No one is expected to pay it. The gross charge exists so that when Blue Cross negotiates a 68% discount, they pay $13,760, and the contract says "68% discount" and both parties feel the transaction was rigorous. A 68% discount on a fictional price produces a real price that is 25% above acquisition cost. That margin is where I live. My 2025 compensation was $26.5 million. Eighty percent of my bonus is tied to EBITDA. Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It is also earnings before the patient opens the bill. Same dose of Keytruda at the hospital across town. Gross charge: $12,000. Blue Cross rate: $10,200. Same drug. Same dose. Same needle. Same cancer. Different spreadsheet. The CMS transparency data showed the ratio between the highest and lowest negotiated price for the same drug at the same hospital can reach 2,347 to one. Not 2x. Not 10x. Not 100x. Two thousand three hundred and forty-seven to one. For the same thing. In the same building. On the same Tuesday. The price is correct. Every drug in the chargemaster has twelve prices. Twelve. Gross charge. Medicare rate. Medicaid rate. Blue Cross. Aetna. Cigna. UnitedHealth. Humana. Workers' comp. Tricare. Auto insurance. And the self-pay rate. The self-pay rate is for the person without insurance. It is the gross charge. The fictional number. The anchor. The person without insurance pays the number that was designed to be negotiated down from. They pay the ceiling because they have no one to negotiate on their behalf. Same drug. Same chair. Same nurse. They pay the price that no insurer in the country would accept. I maintain a file. CDM line item 637-4892-PKB. Saline flush. Sodium chloride 0.9%. Acquisition cost: $0.47. We charge $87. That is an 18,410% markup. The saline flush is used before and after every IV infusion. A chemo patient receiving twelve cycles will be charged $87 for saline fourteen times per visit. I know the math. My team built the math. The math is the job. The price is correct. In 2021, the federal government required hospitals to publish their prices. The Hospital Price Transparency Rule. Machine-readable file. Gross charges. Discounted cash prices. Payer-specific negotiated rates. We complied. We posted the file. The file is a 9,400-row CSV on our website under "Patient Financial Resources." Four clicks from the homepage. Column F: "CDM_GROSS_CHG." Column J: "DERV_PAYERID_NEGRATE." My team designed the column headers. They designed them to comply. They did not design them to communicate. CMS reported 93% of hospitals now post a file. Compliance. But only 62% of the posted data is usable. That gap is where we operate. We are compliant. The data is published. The data is incomprehensible. A researcher downloaded our file. She spent three weeks cleaning it. She called the billing department for clarification on 340 line items. They transferred her four times. The fourth transfer was to a voicemail box that was full. She published her analysis anyway. Cardiac catheterization lab charges: $8,200 to $71,000 for the same procedure depending on the payer. The report received eleven views on our press monitoring dashboard. I saw it. I did not forward it. On April 1, a new CMS rule takes effect. Hospital CEOs must personally attest — by name, encoded in the machine-readable file — that the pricing data is "true, accurate, and complete." My name. Sam Hazen. In the file. Attesting that 42,000 fictional anchors are true, accurate, and complete. They are complete. I will give them that. Forty-two thousand line items is nothing if not complete. A new analyst read the transparency data. She asked why the same MRI costs $450 for Medicare and $4,200 for Aetna in the same building on the same machine. I told her the rates reflect negotiated contractual agreements between the payer and the facility. She said that doesn't explain the difference. I told her the difference IS the contractual agreement. She said that sounds like the price is arbitrary. I told her the price is the result of a rigorous, multi-variable analysis that accounts for acuity, case mix, regional market dynamics, and payer contract terms. She asked if I could show her the analysis. I told her the analysis is proprietary. The analysis does not exist. The analysis is my team, in Q4, adjusting the chargemaster upward by the percentage the CFO wrote on a sticky note. The sticky note this year said "6-8%." They chose 7.4% because it is between six and eight and it has a decimal, which makes it look calculated. She stopped asking. The price is correct. My insurance. The executive health plan. Not in the chargemaster. Administered separately. I do not pay the gross charge. I do not pay the negotiated rate. I pay a $20 copay for services at our own facilities. Gross charge for my treatment: $14,200. Insured rate for our largest commercial payer: $8,600. I pay $20. The executive health plan was designed by the Chief Human Resources Officer and approved by the compensation committee. I was not on the compensation committee. I was a beneficiary of it. That is a different thing. I benefit from the system I price. I price the system I benefit from. These are two separate facts that happen to involve the same person. HCA Healthcare was named the Most Admired Company in our industry by Fortune magazine for the twelfth consecutive year. That was February. The same month I sold $21.5 million in company stock and purchased zero shares. Fortune did not ask about the chargemaster. I am Sam Hazen, CEO of HCA Healthcare. I have 42,000 prices in a spreadsheet across 182 hospitals. None of them are real. All of them are charged. Same drug: $12,000 or $43,000. Depends on which spreadsheet. Which building. Which contract. Which page of which PDF. The patient who has no contract pays the most. The researcher who found the discrepancy got a voicemail box that was full. The analyst who asked why stopped asking. The executive who prices the system pays $20. On April 1, I will personally attest that this is true, accurate, and complete. The price is correct. The price has always been correct. I am the price.

English
0
0
0
90
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
Justin Dubin, MD
Justin Dubin, MD@justindubinmd·
TO ALL UROLOGISTS (sorry for long tweet but please give it a read) The @CMSGov has once again changed some of the RVU values for surgeries and now while I do not perform as many BPH surgeries as I have in the past, I as well as the MAJORITY of practicing urologists, especially generalists are dedicated to the daily care of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). For decades, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) has been the gold standard of surgical management for BPH, and it remains the benchmark in the rapidly evolving treatment landscape. The typical operative time for TURP has not changed and the procedure demands continuous mental focus, physical effort, and advanced technical skill. The 2026 proposed rule recommends reducing the value of TURP (CPT 52601) to 10.00 wRVU—down from 13.16 in 2025. This constitutes a cut of nearly 25% in reimbursement and represents a serious miscalculation. The intensity and complexity of performing TURP have not diminished. The work required remains unchanged and should be recognized accordingly. I have seen on several urology forums and chat groups how upset most urologists rightfully are about this, but little has been offered for fixing it. Here is an idea - not by me, but by my friend and excellent Urologist Dr. Michael Tradewell (@doctorT_urology) . His idea which I endorse, is below: I urge CMS to maintain the 2025 TURP value of 13.16 wRVU and to re-scale the remaining 2026 Section II, E, 4(11) Transurethral Robotic-Assisted Resection of Prostate (CPT Codes 52500, 52601, 52630, 52648, 52649, and 52XX1) wRVU valuations using the proposed 2026 values relative to TURP. For example, for aquablation (code 52xx1): 10.25 x 13.16 / 10.00 = 13.49 And for HoLEP (code 52649): 13.00 x 13.16 / 10.00  = 17.108 Adopting these values will provide fair and equitable compensation for the broad range of BPH treatments that urologists deliver now and in the years ahead. Thank you for your consideration. The proposed cuts to TURP are terrible… I submitted a comment to the CMS 2026 Proposed Rule. It was easy. You can do it too. Go to this link and leave a comment. You can leave your own comment but if you agree with his recommended changes feel free to copy/paste that and/or share. federalregister.gov/documents/2025… The 2026 CMS proposal was released around 14 days ago and today there are only 300 comments… Urologists have numbers, if we all submit to CMS we can hopefully move the needle in the right direction. Instead of complaining to each other, we have the opportunity to work together and try to help our community by using our voices. #SaveTURP
English
23
58
193
76.2K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
Kevin Chu, MD
Kevin Chu, MD@kevinchumd·
Absolutely insane that urologists are facing a 25–30% cut to BPH procedure reimbursement while inflation rises and surgical demands stay the same. Urologists have to push back, patients don’t understand the complexities of healthcare financing / reimbursement (complexity designed on purpose). Maybe if every urologist switched to cash only will we stop getting heavy cuts thrown our way. We need to push back. I will be submitting my comment—please do your part. 👇 #SaveTURP #urology
Justin Dubin, MD@justindubinmd

TO ALL UROLOGISTS (sorry for long tweet but please give it a read) The @CMSGov has once again changed some of the RVU values for surgeries and now while I do not perform as many BPH surgeries as I have in the past, I as well as the MAJORITY of practicing urologists, especially generalists are dedicated to the daily care of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). For decades, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) has been the gold standard of surgical management for BPH, and it remains the benchmark in the rapidly evolving treatment landscape. The typical operative time for TURP has not changed and the procedure demands continuous mental focus, physical effort, and advanced technical skill. The 2026 proposed rule recommends reducing the value of TURP (CPT 52601) to 10.00 wRVU—down from 13.16 in 2025. This constitutes a cut of nearly 25% in reimbursement and represents a serious miscalculation. The intensity and complexity of performing TURP have not diminished. The work required remains unchanged and should be recognized accordingly. I have seen on several urology forums and chat groups how upset most urologists rightfully are about this, but little has been offered for fixing it. Here is an idea - not by me, but by my friend and excellent Urologist Dr. Michael Tradewell (@doctorT_urology) . His idea which I endorse, is below: I urge CMS to maintain the 2025 TURP value of 13.16 wRVU and to re-scale the remaining 2026 Section II, E, 4(11) Transurethral Robotic-Assisted Resection of Prostate (CPT Codes 52500, 52601, 52630, 52648, 52649, and 52XX1) wRVU valuations using the proposed 2026 values relative to TURP. For example, for aquablation (code 52xx1): 10.25 x 13.16 / 10.00 = 13.49 And for HoLEP (code 52649): 13.00 x 13.16 / 10.00  = 17.108 Adopting these values will provide fair and equitable compensation for the broad range of BPH treatments that urologists deliver now and in the years ahead. Thank you for your consideration. The proposed cuts to TURP are terrible… I submitted a comment to the CMS 2026 Proposed Rule. It was easy. You can do it too. Go to this link and leave a comment. You can leave your own comment but if you agree with his recommended changes feel free to copy/paste that and/or share. federalregister.gov/documents/2025… The 2026 CMS proposal was released around 14 days ago and today there are only 300 comments… Urologists have numbers, if we all submit to CMS we can hopefully move the needle in the right direction. Instead of complaining to each other, we have the opportunity to work together and try to help our community by using our voices. #SaveTURP

English
4
9
57
7.3K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
salaryDr
salaryDr@SalaryDr·
Medicare’s message to doctors: “Do more, get paid less.” 2025 conversion factor: $32.35 2015 conversion factor: $35.93 A decade of cuts while demands explode. This isn’t reform—it’s sabotage. In 2025, the Medicare conversion factor will be lower than it was in 2015. A decade later, doctors are getting paid less per unit of work—while inflation, admin burden, and burnout have all skyrocketed.
salaryDr tweet media
English
54
208
685
88.4K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
Abhinav Sidana
Abhinav Sidana@AbhinavSidana·
Postdoc Opportunity – Urology Research at UChicago! 🚨 Join my team to advance Prostate Cancer research! Key roles: clinical research, trials, data management, manuscript & grant writing. 💰 Salary: $61K-$74K (NIH scale) 📍 Location: University of Chicago 📩 Apply: Send CV & research goals to Abhinav.Sidana@bsd.uchicago.edu 🔗 More info: bsdpostdoc.uchicago.edu #Postdoc #Urology #Research #Hiring @AmerUrological
English
0
21
60
7.9K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
Dutch Rojas
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas·
Today, a physician working at the same productivity level is stuck with $32.36 per RVU—which means, adjusted for inflation, they’re effectively making HALF of what they used to. Think about that: same work, half the pay. Meanwhile: Hospitals get sweetheart site-of-service fees. Private equity buys up independent practices at fire-sale prices. @CMSgov @droz @hhsgov @seckennedy keeps slashing physician reimbursement. Bureaucrats rake in raises while doctors get the shaft. In 1992, the Medicare conversion factor was $31.00. Today? $32.36. That’s a $1.36 total increase in 33 YEARS. If it had just kept up with inflation, it would be over $64.00 today. Instead, it’s more than 50% below where it should be. A doc today has to see twice the patients, do twice the procedures, and grind twice as hard just to keep up. And what does Congress do? No doc fix in the latest CR. No relief. No respect. Just another reminder that the system values hospitals and middlemen over the people actually delivering care. Physicians aren’t just underpaid. They’re being systematically devalued. @WaysandMeansGOP @GOPDoctors Not #healthcare
English
42
132
538
210K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
Michigan Football
Michigan Football@UMichFootball·
'TIS THE SEASON! 〽️
Michigan Football tweet media
English
223
4.8K
25K
943.7K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
Michigan Football
Michigan Football@UMichFootball·
IT'S GREAT TO BE A MICHIGAN WOLVERINE! 〽️
English
174
3K
14.7K
427.5K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
UChicago Urology Residency
UChicago Urology Residency@UChicagoUro·
Kudos to our @UChicagoUrology UroCyclers for a great show out at the 39th annual North Shore Century ride! The matching gear may have boosted our speed 🚴‍♂️
UChicago Urology Residency tweet media
English
0
4
25
2.3K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
UChicago Urology Residency
UChicago Urology Residency@UChicagoUro·
Join us for our Virtual Open House this Thursday 8/29 and next Thursday 9/5 at 7:30pm CST! Sign up at the link listed on the SAU website or use the QR code below. Zoom link will be emailed prior to each session. Feel free to DM with questions! 📩 sauweb.org/match-program/…
UChicago Urology Residency tweet media
English
0
9
16
7.2K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
Wendy Hasson MD
Wendy Hasson MD@WendyHassonMD·
What it’s like to be in healthcare right now: “We will pay you $2 for that pie” “But it costs me $4 in pie ingredients and $2 in human labor to make a pie. We need $6 to break even” “Sorry, we’ll only pay you $2 for that pie. We suggest you make many more pies that you also sell for $2/pie. New requirement is 6 pies/day” “But then we are still losing $4 per pie. How does making more pies help us?” “We just found out flour is on shortage so you’ll have to buy more expensive imported flour and will lose $5 per pie. Or you can consider making pies without flour.” “But I can’t make pies if we keep losing money on pies. And I can’t make pies without flour” “We suggest you ditch rolling pins and remove any fruit filling as a cost saving measure. And consider limiting how much time you bake the pie for to use less oven time” “But then how can I even make a pie that resembles a pie?” “We appreciate the question and have no response. We empower YOU to solve this problem. We have scheduled 4 meetings to discuss how you can make more pies with less ingredients and less oven time and less labor” “But it seems the root of the problem here is actually that we don’t get reimbursed fairly for our pies…” “Don’t say that out loud. Please get back to making pies with no filling and no flour and no rolling pins and be sure to attend the meetings.” #medtwitter #Pediatrics #insurance
English
173
516
3.1K
391K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
The Winged Helmet
The Winged Helmet@TWH_Chris·
Michigan has scored 117 points against Ohio State over the last three meetings, averaging 39 PPG. Here's all 15 of Michigan's touchdowns from those contests. Enjoy.〽️
English
28
271
2K
120.5K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
Jennifer Livschitz, MD, MS
Jennifer Livschitz, MD, MS@jenlivschitz·
I keep pinching myself because I still can’t believe it’s real! I matched into my dream program @MDAndersonNews for #RadOnc! I am so unbelievably thankful for my amazing family, friends and mentors who have always been there for me and inspire me daily. Houston, here I come!!
Jennifer Livschitz, MD, MS tweet mediaJennifer Livschitz, MD, MS tweet mediaJennifer Livschitz, MD, MS tweet mediaJennifer Livschitz, MD, MS tweet media
English
24
13
329
11.3K
Nathan Graham 리트윗함
Dr. Glaucomflecken
Dr. Glaucomflecken@DGlaucomflecken·
United Health Group owned company is responsible for cyber attack Medical practice goes bankrupt due to cyber attack UHG tells regulators that failure to approve sale of bankrupt practice to UHG will force practice to close. (Insert hot dog suit meme) prospect.org/health/2024-03…
English
47
390
1.6K
194.7K