holin

25.6K posts

holin

holin

@HolinHong

Welcome to a need-based news-reporting age where opinions over facts. Ops, did I say facts? I meant fat acts...in metabolism...

planet earth 가입일 Mart 2016
143 팔로잉611 팔로워
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@Breaking911 “Paper tiger”——the expression President Trump quoted on Iran alters the origins of the Intel cabinet he uses…
English
0
0
0
238
Breaking911
Breaking911@Breaking911·
REPORTER: "You said earlier today…that you would like to take Iran's oil, but Americans want U.S. forces home. What's that tradeoff?" TRUMP: "I'm a businessman first…To the victor go the spoils."
English
27
81
846
56.6K
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@scitechgirl They will continuously discovery a new particle for each force with each of the new discoveries contradicting to the past discoveries and exhibiting phenomena with zero capacity to explain the logic
English
0
0
0
10
SciTech Girl
SciTech Girl@scitechgirl·
*🚨 Did Scientists Just Find the “Particle of Gravity”? The Truth Is Stranger Than You Think… For years, scientists have been chasing something almost unbelievable… a tiny, invisible particle that could explain gravity itself. It’s called the *graviton*—a mysterious piece of the universe that, if found, could change everything we know about reality. Recently, headlines started spreading fast, claiming researchers had finally detected something that *acts like* this gravity particle. Sounds like a breakthrough, right? But here’s where it gets interesting… What scientists actually detected were **gravitational waves**—tiny ripples in space and time, first confirmed by LIGO. These ripples prove gravity behaves in ways Einstein predicted, but they are **not the particle itself**. The graviton still remains hidden, possibly deeper than anything we’ve ever measured. So why does this matter? Because finding it could unlock the biggest mystery in science—how the universe truly works at its deepest level. The truth is… we’re closer than ever. But the final answer? Still just out of reach. **And that’s what makes this discovery so mysterious.** **Source LIGO Scientific Collaboration. *Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger*. Physical Review Letters.
SciTech Girl tweet media
English
8
23
58
1.1K
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@elonmusk Healthcare/education/housing/food/transportation/communication/gov Deep water
English
2
1
4
21
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@sciencegirl That’s a cosmetic conclusion. When working, assure of the delivery regardless the social ranking of the job is the core. How many jobs in U.S. are timecard punching and how many laws sits there for displaying only?
English
0
0
0
35
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
This is why Japan is one of the cleanest countries in the world
English
81
420
2.3K
45.9K
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@NightSkyNow Such a conclusion w 95% of the universe remains unknown n unexplored? Those researches need to have a common sense base by adding applicable intervals; such as intervals sharing similar frequencies ranges in this case
English
0
0
3
45
Night Sky Now
Night Sky Now@NightSkyNow·
Quantum entanglement is one of nature’s most haunting mysteries — proof that the universe might be more unified than we can imagine. When two particles are born together, they share one quantum state. No matter how far apart they drift, they remain one. 🌌
Night Sky Now tweet media
English
12
37
142
2.8K
𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇
𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇@pr0ud_americans·
Stop what you're doing and watch this. Artemis II astronaut Victor Glover, speaking from roughly 160,000 miles away from Earth, just dropped a powerful perspective on life and our planet.🚀🙏 From that distance, everything looks different. Worth hearing.
English
421
1.7K
10.2K
171K
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@elonmusk Honest…is subjective. Informing cancer cells they’re threatening and needs to be eliminated is honest. Yet it must be jeopardizing if cancer cells can hear it. Such drive probably being the reason that composed Bible w a base tune of human was born w love
English
1
1
3
25
Amazing Physics
Amazing Physics@amazing_physics·
What changed? Apollo 17 1972 vs Artemis II 2026?
Amazing Physics tweet media
English
667
435
9K
1.2M
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@NightSkyNow Why does a lab owner report to the lab creature? Showing care may presented as providing a comfort zone w enough supplies. Minimized interaction provides most authentic data due to its raw
English
0
0
0
52
Night Sky Now
Night Sky Now@NightSkyNow·
If aliens exist, why haven’t they visited Earth?
Night Sky Now tweet media
English
83
11
88
5.4K
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@TheEXECUTlONER_ 2 sides of the story. Human probably landed on moon but 1969 was a replication to what had happened. It’s not a tech being developed but heired/lost&reclaimed.
English
0
0
0
16
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈@TheEXECUTlONER_·
Do you believe we landed on the moon in 1969? True question. I have read all the conspiracy theories, heard all the whys and why nots. If you do or don’t, tell us why please. Curious to know what everyone thinks. 🤔
English
431
109
247
24.3K
Concerned Citizen
Concerned Citizen@BGatesIsaPyscho·
“How polluted is the Ganges River in India?” If only India had switched to Paper Straws, then they could’ve avoided this.
English
798
2.4K
7.1K
166.7K
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@YourAnonOne Swim with dive fin shoes may help. In view the limited space, adding inflatable layers in uniform w ejection exhausts, with manual input tube n pump. Keep warm, works as motion booster and reserve for emergency oxygen supplies
English
0
0
1
795
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@MatrixMysteries What eventually disclosed is the Nash equilibrium in a sociology setting(big module) that capitalism may fail if the goal is profit driven.
English
0
0
0
11
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@MatrixMysteries Ideally, sold in cheaper will drive sales. In reality, once it hit a cheaper price in pattern, it never sold well in higher price due to the obvious reason. Somewhere in between, some merchants chose to donate to food bank or other 501c(3) to preserve (tax) value.
English
1
0
0
148
MatrixMysteries
MatrixMysteries@MatrixMysteries·
An American showed what his local Krispy Kreme does with unsold donuts at night. Straight into the trash. After private equity took over, the price of a dozen climbed to $22. And instead of selling them cheaper… They’d rather WASTE the food than lower the profit margin.
English
664
1.4K
5.8K
3.1M
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@sciencegirl It may sounds frustrating. The core that sperms provide is not the genetic material but the minor voltage the moment it breaks the membrane of the egg which can be zinc or magnesium based chemical reaction. As long as the voltage was provided, an egg may split.
English
0
0
0
144
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
The miracle of life
English
74
320
1.4K
123.8K
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@CuriosityonX Ignoring the background, 1972 offers much clear details which suggests a better optical equipment were used with a bigger range on focus. How so?! You know it
English
0
0
0
42
Curiosity
Curiosity@CuriosityonX·
🚨: The Blue Marble Apollo 17 1972 vs Artemis II 2026 What changed?
Curiosity tweet media
English
3.2K
1.4K
14.8K
1.6M
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@Kekius_Sage Great idea. Assure it won’t impact photosynthesis. Maybe human can have glowing skin in dark soon
English
0
0
0
164
Kekius Maximus
Kekius Maximus@Kekius_Sage·
🚨 Chinese scientists are turning plants into glowing streetlights with firefly genes, aiming to create bio-cities powered by water and nutrients instead of electricity.
Kekius Maximus tweet mediaKekius Maximus tweet media
English
251
1.7K
13.7K
811.2K
holin
holin@HolinHong·
@MargoGman @CharlesMullins2 That’s called big data. In many cases, it converted to cultures/traditions/social modules and religions.
English
0
0
0
35
Margarita
Margarita@MargoGman·
@HolinHong @CharlesMullins2 We are affected by what we observe and what we observe affects us. Simple. Our thoughts about the past change the many nows yet to be. So the effect of the past on the future is what changes, not the past.
English
1
0
0
45
TheNewPhysics
TheNewPhysics@CharlesMullins2·
🚨 BREAKING: The universe might not decide the past… until the future happens. In the delayed choice experiment, a particle behaves like a wave or a particle after it’s already passed the slits. Read that again. The outcome isn’t decided when it happens… it’s decided when it’s observed. Standard physics says: “measurement collapses the wavefunction.” But look deeper. In my framework: The system isn’t moving forward through time It exists as a complete structure across time So nothing is “changing the past”… The past was never fixed to begin with. What we call reality is just the slice we observe. So the real question is: If the future helps define the past… what does that say about time itself? Follow for deeper physics beyond spacetime.
English
73
257
1.4K
104.1K
TheNewPhysics
TheNewPhysics@CharlesMullins2·
Not AI just sticking to testable physics. Bose’s work didn’t come from an error, it came from counting identical particles correctly, which led to Bose–Einstein statistics and later experimental confirmation. If there’s a specific calculation you think is wrong, I’m happy to look at it but it needs to be concrete.
English
1
0
0
9