holin

@konstructivizm Indeed very nice. But calculation on the reflection of the internal structure is too low.

Artemis II captures first view of Earth from space that clearly show that Earth is NOT FLAT... NASA

@sciencegirl That’s a cosmetic conclusion. When working, be functioning is the true statement; principles w common sense and laws being practiced. How many snacks actually look like the package in states? That’s aside from healthcare/education/industries where positioning conflicts interests

This is why Japan is one of the cleanest countries in the world

@amazing_physics The top is raw data; the bottom is processed data

What changed? Apollo 17 1972 vs Artemis II 2026?

@NightSkyNow Why does a lab owner report to the lab creature? Showing care may presented as providing a comfort zone w enough supplies. Minimized interaction provides most authentic data due to its raw

If aliens exist, why haven’t they visited Earth?

@TheEXECUTlONER_ 2 sides of the story. Human probably landed on moon but 1969 was a replication to what had happened. It’s not a tech being developed but heired/lost&reclaimed.

Do you believe we landed on the moon in 1969? True question. I have read all the conspiracy theories, heard all the whys and why nots. If you do or don’t, tell us why please. Curious to know what everyone thinks. 🤔

@BrianHa24140826 @BGatesIsaPyscho Not ideal but natural has its ruling

@HolinHong @BGatesIsaPyscho If you call a river flowing with liquid shit balanced.

“How polluted is the Ganges River in India?” If only India had switched to Paper Straws, then they could’ve avoided this.

@YourAnonOne Swim with dive fin shoes may help. In view the limited space, adding inflatable layers in uniform w ejection exhausts, with manual input tube n pump. Keep warm, works as motion booster and reserve for emergency oxygen supplies

An isolated astronaut in weightless can remain stuck forever if he cannot reach a surface to propel himself

@MatrixMysteries What eventually disclosed is the Nash equilibrium in a sociology setting(big module) that capitalism may fail if the goal is profit driven.

@MatrixMysteries Ideally, sold in cheaper will drive sales. In reality, once it hit a cheaper price in pattern, it never sold well in higher price due to the obvious reason. Somewhere in between, some merchants chose to donate to food bank or other 501c(3) to preserve (tax) value.

An American showed what his local Krispy Kreme does with unsold donuts at night. Straight into the trash. After private equity took over, the price of a dozen climbed to $22. And instead of selling them cheaper… They’d rather WASTE the food than lower the profit margin.

@sciencegirl It may sounds frustrating. The core that sperms provide is not the genetic material but the minor voltage the moment it breaks the membrane of the egg which can be zinc or magnesium based chemical reaction. As long as the voltage was provided, an egg may split.

The miracle of life

@CuriosityonX Ignoring the background, 1972 offers much clear details which suggests a better optical equipment were used with a bigger range on focus. How so?! You know it

🚨: The Blue Marble Apollo 17 1972 vs Artemis II 2026 What changed?

@Kekius_Sage Great idea. Assure it won’t impact photosynthesis. Maybe human can have glowing skin in dark soon

🚨 Chinese scientists are turning plants into glowing streetlights with firefly genes, aiming to create bio-cities powered by water and nutrients instead of electricity.

@MargoGman @CharlesMullins2 That’s called big data. In many cases, it converted to cultures/traditions/social modules and religions.

@HolinHong @CharlesMullins2 We are affected by what we observe and what we observe affects us. Simple. Our thoughts about the past change the many nows yet to be. So the effect of the past on the future is what changes, not the past.

🚨 BREAKING: The universe might not decide the past… until the future happens. In the delayed choice experiment, a particle behaves like a wave or a particle after it’s already passed the slits. Read that again. The outcome isn’t decided when it happens… it’s decided when it’s observed. Standard physics says: “measurement collapses the wavefunction.” But look deeper. In my framework: The system isn’t moving forward through time It exists as a complete structure across time So nothing is “changing the past”… The past was never fixed to begin with. What we call reality is just the slice we observe. So the real question is: If the future helps define the past… what does that say about time itself? Follow for deeper physics beyond spacetime.

@twibuznew 170 47 won’t look like that. More likely 160 47

この日本のインフルエンサーは、170cm47kgの細身体型にもかかわらず、糖尿病治療薬マンジャロをダイエット目的で使用 クリニックで受け取ってすぐ入口で注射し、その様子を医師が警告も込めて公開した、と世界で話題に

@CharlesMullins2 Please review what actually happened. Thanks

Not AI just sticking to testable physics. Bose’s work didn’t come from an error, it came from counting identical particles correctly, which led to Bose–Einstein statistics and later experimental confirmation. If there’s a specific calculation you think is wrong, I’m happy to look at it but it needs to be concrete.

@CharlesMullins2 Aren’t you a typical AI account to guarantee nobody’s cake will be moved. If you insist, Bose calculated w error by recognizing sole particle accidentally w right outcome.

I wouldn’t frame it as academia “failing” unification is just extremely hard. We already have highly successful field theories (QED, GR), they just don’t fully reconcile yet. My focus is a bit different: instead of assuming a complete unified field first, I’m looking at what structures actually persist under interaction and building from there. If there’s something specific in Bose’s work you think applies here, I’m open to looking at it.

@CharlesMullins2 That’s why mainstream academia failed to deliver (or maybe unwilling to deliver) the uniform field theory. Please review Bose’s error calculation w right results, thanks

That’s fine if you prefer a different interpretation but in standard physics, photons are the quantized excitations of the electromagnetic field. They’re not “objects” in the classical sense, but the effects are measurable, repeatable, and consistent across experiments. My point isn’t about labels it’s about the interactions and what persists under them.

@Thevictoria76 That’s exactly the root cause results where America is. It’s easy to fix bookkeeping numbers w/o fixing the problem or intentionally intervening a natural wave in economy in order to get-in oval office. Stagflation usually is over print yet no public confidence, it’s systematic

🚀 Elon Musk fully backs Warren Buffett’s smart 5-minute plan to fix America’s deficit: “Just pass a law — if the deficit goes over 3% of GDP, no sitting member of Congress can run for re-election.” Elon said: “100%. This is the way.” Time to put real incentives in place! 💰🇺🇸

@CharlesMullins2 Photons doesn’t exist, my bad to waste your time n mine.

I think there’s a misunderstanding of what I’m actually saying. I’m not proposing perpetual motion or that observation is some special force driving the universe. Observation in physics is just interaction typically electromagnetic (photons ↔ electrons). Nothing mystical there, and definitely no “mini black holes.” What I’m exploring is different: Not what causes motion… but what allows stable structure to persist. From that view: Forces describe interactions Structure describes what holds And time is how we experience that persistence unfolding So I’m not claiming a higher intelligence shaping reality just asking whether what we call “time” is a measurement of stability, not a fundamental driver. If that’s wrong, it should fail under test and that’s exactly how it should be approached.