Michael Rappaport

@EWess92 Make that, why does it seem fine?

@EWess92 What does it seem fine? Why isn't reputational accountability a good thing?

Scott Johnson: "When the Eighth Circuit reverses the opinion of a district judge, it customarily omits the name of the judge as a matter of courtesy." This is a bad policy. Federal judges are insulated. Reputational accountability is the one check on their behavior.

@CassSunstein @lsolum @WilliamBaude @StephenESachs @sherifgirgis I don't think we are all Dworkinians. I am not one. But I do think there is a Dworkinian argument for originalism.

Are We All Dworkinians Now? @lsolum @WilliamBaude @StephenESachs @sherifgirgis casssunstein.substack.com/p/are-we-all-d…

It was a full house today as we welcomed @MichaelRapp from USD Law to discuss the Unitary Executive Theory with our very own @jdmortenson and @chris_j_walker. Thank you to the panelists!

Thanks to the Michigan Federalist Society.

Discussing the Presidential Control Theory of the Unitary Executive with Chris Walker and Julian Mortenson -- based on this essay. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… The discussion was a lot of fun.

@EdWhelanEPPC Yes, it is embarrassing -- for her, especially because she does not realize it.

Sotomayor asks a 3-minute question, cuts off response after 10 words, talks for another 30 seconds, cuts off response after 5 words, and again and again.

@avidseries @Musa_alGharbi I agree with your basic point about the wealthy students being self-centered. But why do you say the service workers are exploited? They may not be as fortunate but why is that exploitation?

Liberal academic @Musa_alGharbi's observations when he moved to Manhattan: "One of the first things that stood out to me is that there’s a racialized caste system here that everyone takes for granted. You have disposable servants who will clean your house, watch your kids, walk your dogs, deliver food to you... mostly minorities and immigrants and disproportionately women... And this is basically taken for granted in New York, that this is the way society operates. And yet... this is not how things are in many other parts of the country. Most other places, the person buying a pair of shoes and the person selling them are likely to be the same race — white — and the gaps between the buyer and the seller are likely to be much smaller. Even the most sexist or bigoted rich white person in many other contexts wouldn’t be able to exploit women and minorities the same way as the typical liberal professional in a city like Seattle or New York; the infrastructure simply isn’t there. It’s these progressive bastions associated with the knowledge economy that have these well-oiled machines for casually exploiting the vulnerable, desperate and disadvantaged. And it’s largely Democratic-voting professionals who take advantage of them. A few months after I arrived at Columbia, Trump won. I expected this to happen, but for most people, that was not the expectation. So here at Columbia, the day after Trump won, a lot of the students claimed to be so traumatized that they couldn’t do tests or homework. They needed time off. Now there are two things striking about that to me. First, these are students at an Ivy League school, overwhelmingly people from wealthy backgrounds — and even if they don’t come from wealth, they’re likely to be well-positioned... [but these] students seemed to view themselves as somehow uniquely vulnerable to Trump and his regime, as being especially threatened or victimized. And so they demanded all of these accommodations for themselves. Meanwhile, there was this whole other constellation of people [mostly minorities and immigrants] around them who seemed to be literally invisible to them. The people doing all the work on the campus... these ignored laborers — the people with the most at stake in this election — [were not] saying they needed time off because they were too traumatized. They showed up to work the next day and did their jobs. They weren’t making a scene, sobbing as they scrubbed rich kids’ mess out of the toilets. The juxtaposition was sobering... When I left campus, walking around the Upper West Side, or other affluent parts of Manhattan, similar scenes were playing out. Nor was New York City unique in this regard. Other knowledge economy hubs had similar scenes playing out. And the same drama that was playing out in Columbia was unfolding at colleges and universities across the country. This is precisely what I found so troubling, so difficult to shake off: It wasn’t about my own school. It was about this broader disjuncture between knowledge-economy elites, their narratives about the world, and the realities on the ground."

@okcamars For some reason he is taking bad shots. He needs to only shoot when he is open.

Lu Dort is currently on one or the worst offensive stretches in NBA history

@robinhanson I thought you were being sarcastic. Have you seen the DEI mandates? Sports has none of that.

The nicest thing about the Oscars is that it is one of our rare public celebrations of meritocracy.

I have long thought there was a critical period for music exposure. This seeks to explain it.

@PhilWMagness I don't have a position on the duties nomenclature. But the idea that the executive could be delegated authority over certain subjects, including foreign commerce, does not depend on it.

@MichaelRapp Thomas made some egregious historical errors. lawliberty.org/thomass-confus…

John Roberts' ruling in the Obamacare case may be the worst major supreme court decision in the last 50 years. The Clarence Thomas dissent in the recent tariff case nonetheless makes it look like a beacon of legal clarity by comparison.

@PhilWMagness I should have said "tariff laws" rather than "tariff policy."

@PhilWMagness Fair enough. Since I adopt a similar view to Thomas as to delegation of the tariff policy, I suppose I disagree. See here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…. I do think that Roberts was correct on the statutory interpretation question. And I do oppose the tariffs on policy grounds.

From Nellie Bowles: There were more synagogue attacks this week than days in the week. Last weekend: There were three shootings at synagogues within a 10-mile radius in Toronto. On Monday: In Liège, Belgium, a synagogue was bombed. On Thursday: A man with a rifle and explosives drove into the largest synagogue in West Bloomfield, Michigan. On Thursday afternoon: In Trondheim, Norway, police arrested a man for suspicious behavior outside a synagogue. On the earliest hours of Friday: There was an arson attack at a Rotterdam synagogue. And that’s just the last seven days. To say this is simply “rising antisemitism,” which is typically how the headlines put it, fails to miss the speed and severity of this virus. We are living through an alarming, historic period in which the guardrails that previously kept this hate at bay have fallen away.

You don't sign up. You just visit it.

Originalism, Substantive Due Process, and the Privileges or Immunities Clause by Mike Rappaport Link below. There is a strong case that the traditional right to raise one’s children as one sees fit was protected by the Privileges or Immunities Clause.  This is a