Nate

1.2K posts

Nate banner
Nate

Nate

@NateGenX

oh and one more thing

가입일 Kasım 2022
42 팔로잉32 팔로워
고정된 트윗
Nate
Nate@NateGenX·
@eigenrobot you have no understanding of the consequences of what you do oh and one more thing you aren’t going to like what comes after Charlie Kirk
English
1
1
4
834
Nate
Nate@NateGenX·
@gfodor Once the government has nationalized one AI company they will eventually nationalize them all. And ban open weights on top just to be sure. They WANT to control this tech exactly like nuclear.
English
1
0
19
1.1K
gfodor.id
gfodor.id@gfodor·
I'm moving from "Anthropic could be nationalized" to "Anthropic should be nationalized." Be it malice or incompetence, they are generating chaos for no good reason, and seem clueless as to how and why this is happening to them. This organization can't be trusted with ASI.
prinz@deredleritt3r

Parsing this evening's events: - The U.S. government approved the release of Fable 5 to the public, clearly under the presumption that the model's cybersecurity capabilities cannot be accessed by hackers, authoritarian regimes, etc. - Recently (today?), "another company" showed the U.S. government that a jailbreak of Fable 5 *is possible*. Yes, a minor jailbreak - but how can a non-technical government official be assured that there aren't also other, more dangerous, jailbreaks in this model that won't be discovered by the CCP? - Anthropic states, completely correctly, that: "We suspect that perfect jailbreak resistance is not currently possible for any model provider. Every safeguard used in the industry is vulnerable to non-universal jailbreaks (which can elicit some cyber information in specific circumstances), and it is likely that universal jailbreaks will eventually be found in the future. We stated this clearly when we released Fable 5." - My best guess is that the U.S. government did not fully realize this at the time when the release of Fable 5 was approved. - Per Axios, the government contacted Anthropic and asked to "pause releasing the... models but was unsuccessful" - i.e., Anthropic told the government to pound sand. - Per Axios, this "prompt[ed] the export control letter". - Per Axios, the U.S. government is *NOT* looking to restrict access to Fable to U.S. nationals forever. "The model needs to remain locked down until the U.S. governent's national security apparatus is hardened", which "could happen in a few weeks". - I interpret Anthropic's reaction as challenging the government: "we believe the government should have the ability to block unsafe deployments, as part of a statutory process that is transparent, fair, clear, and grounded in technical facts. This action does not adhere to those principles." If the Axios article is correct, I do not think any other model providers have anything to fear based solely on this evening's events, because: (1) they would hopefully be smarter than downright rejecting a request by the U.S. government to pause releasing a model, and (2) they will be required anyway under the recent executive order to give the U.S. government at least 30 days to test the model for cybersecurity capabilities - during which time the U.S. government would also be able to shore up its own cybersecurity defenses with the same model. I remain extremely concerned that actions by one particular U.S. lab over the last few months might be moving us closer and closer to the scenario where at least that lab - and potentially all others - will be nationalized.

English
53
26
534
41.2K
Nate
Nate@NateGenX·
@tekbog At least they are successfully protecting their population from Apple’s awful AI features
English
0
0
2
58
terminally onλine εngineer
cant believe EU is even gonna lose on AI safety policing, it’s actually truly over and heading into full irrelevance
English
10
5
158
4.3K
Angantýr
Angantýr@BasedNorthmathr·
My name will be etched across the stars
Angantýr tweet media
English
6
0
131
3.2K
Nate
Nate@NateGenX·
@sunnyright What would they even say if Trump suggested this tomorrow?
English
0
0
3
54
Nate
Nate@NateGenX·
@memeticsisyphus Famously nobody in Russia or the US cared about the Olympics in the 70s and 80s.
English
0
1
18
751
Melanie D'Arrigo
Melanie D'Arrigo@DarrigoMelanie·
@SallyMayweather @julia_doughty We pay taxes. In a moral world, those taxes would be used to create a stronger, healthier, more prosperous society. Instead our tax dollars are being used to make the obscenely-rich, richer. You’re ok giving your money away to billionaires to buy more yachts with?
English
892
18
378
38.5K
Nate
Nate@NateGenX·
@awstar11 All plumbers nationwide should blacklist the guy.
English
0
0
1
41
Andy
Andy@PositivFuturist·
SpaceX IPO : A Visual Guide.
Andy tweet media
Italiano
33
114
3.2K
145.4K
Nate
Nate@NateGenX·
@shakoistsLog She’s okay with that, it doesn’t affect her personally
English
0
0
0
7
shako
shako@shakoistsLog·
@narindertweets > I'd fill this country with a thousand of this woman than one of those good for nothing thugs. You can't though. The policies that bring her also bring rapists and insanely violent young men. That's the problem.
English
2
2
41
990
Narinder Kaur
Narinder Kaur@narindertweets·
This is possibly the saddest thing I've seen in a long time..an immigrant nurse talking about fleeing her home..she saved her UNIFORM. So she could still WORK for our communities. I'd fill this country with a thousand of this woman than one of those good for nothing thugs. God help this poor woman.
English
6.9K
6.7K
26.3K
2.2M
Nate
Nate@NateGenX·
@MythoYookay I was waiting for the video to cut to her doing actual work that is necessary to society. I would have taken any work, really.
English
1
0
1
1.1K
Shannon Sands
Shannon Sands@max_paperclips·
@ValerioCapraro this is dumb af. You asked it to translate, not interpret and update the number of words. I'd have said "3" as well
English
2
0
63
1.6K
Valerio Capraro
Valerio Capraro@ValerioCapraro·
Claude Fable 5 doesn’t truly understand. And here is a beautiful proof: The Beninatto-Trombetti test is a translation test for professional translators. It measures the ability to infer context, revise the surface form, and generalize beyond literal mapping. For example, the correct translation of: “Solo 3 parole: non sei solo” is not: “Just 3 words: you are not alone” but: “Just 4 words: you are not alone.” An LLM that understands the sentence must also update the meta-linguistic claim inside the sentence. Claude Fable 5 is arguably the most advanced LLM currently available. And yet it still fails this simple test. LLMs are extraordinary machines for recombining existing knowledge. But they don’t truly understand. We are still far from AGI.
Valerio Capraro tweet media
English
234
109
1.4K
389.4K
Nate
Nate@NateGenX·
@mattparlmer Dario is a fanatic, I doubt he cares
English
0
0
4
236
mattparlmer 🪐 🌷
mattparlmer 🪐 🌷@mattparlmer·
This is gonna show up in token revenue numbers right as public company reporting requirements kick in, I’m honestly shocked nobody thought that thru
Naveen Rao@NaveenGRao

My team loves Claude from @AnthropicAI . But this new policy of retaining prompts and usage is a red line...we simply can't give over our usage. Prompts contain our IP; literally all our design files and docs. Why would this ever have been ok? It's sad because everyone was looking forward to using the new model. Sigh.

English
4
1
142
12K
Nate
Nate@NateGenX·
@xlr8harder But good lord does it love tests and fallback code
English
0
0
1
9
xlr8harder
xlr8harder@xlr8harder·
If you haven't tried codex in a while, you really should. It takes a little more work to get it to do what you mean, but I think this is a side effect of it being less willing to make assumptions, which also seems to make it more reliable.
Dylan Patel@dylan522p

Usage share of OpenAI grew vs Anthropic yesterday despite Mythos 5 / Fable 5 launch Multiple power users at SemiAnalysis tried Mythos / Fable Got refusals for nonsensical reasons Got pissed off at Anthropic Gave Codex a legitimate try Now they actually prefer it to 4.8 Opus

English
2
2
42
1.5K