NoFans
789 posts

NoFans
@NoFans7
Writer of Secret Books. Fixer of the Mother Loving Problems. No Fans. Capital Monument Book Instagram @nonefans 📚
가입일 Aralık 2020
20 팔로잉7 팔로워

Vendue par sa mère à 12 ans, enceinte à 14… 20 ans après, les retrouvailles émouvantes avec son fils
Jess Levinson, survivante de la traite des êtres humains, qui a donné naissance à 14 ans, a retrouvé son fils qu'elle avait donné à l'adoption pour la première fois depuis 20 ans.
Elle raconte que sa mère a commencé à la vendre pour de la drogue lorsqu'elle avait 12 ans, ce qui l'a poussée à s'enfuir alors qu'elle était enceinte.
Français

@GLeanne38083 @Jayne70302874 @LilaGraceRose @LiveAction If I had waited long enough for him to express his choice, I am sure my son would have ticked the 'alive' box as well. Choice all around ❤️
English

@NoFans7 @Jayne70302874 @LilaGraceRose @LiveAction Well, I am glad you had a choice that was good for you. Choice is a beautiful thing.
English

Watch. Trafficking survivor Jess Levinson reunites with the baby she gave up for adoption at 14 years old after running away to avoid being coerced into aborting him.
“You were 8 pounds and 2 ounces.”
“Props to you for keeping me alive. It’s just been wonderful. It’s been a great life. It’s been more of a life than I could ask for… life is beautiful.”
This is the first time in 20 years they’re reuniting. Life is so precious.
English

Trafficking survivor who gave birth at 14 reunites with her son, whom she put up for adoption, for the first time in 20 years.
Jess Levinson's mother started trafficking her for drugs when she was just 12 years old.
At the age of 14, after becoming pregnant, she ran away from home to avoid pressure to abort her son, according to Live Action.
She gave birth and spent 3 months with her son before putting him up for adoption so he could live a better life.
Levinson has now been reunited with him for the first time in 20 years.
Video: Live Action
English

@GLeanne38083 @Jayne70302874 @LilaGraceRose @LiveAction Yet I worked my hardest to secure life for him. It was the actual point. I was not compensated for my interview. I will wear my battle scars accordingly. Thank you and blessings today.
English

@Jayne70302874 @LilaGraceRose @LiveAction Lmao. Save it, friend. Go tell your idol Ms Mega Grifter Lila Rose to operate a credible publication and then you can preach. Lila only featured this story because a 14 year old gave birth not aborted. If she would have aborted Lila would never have published her story of being
English
NoFans 리트윗함

@lizcourserants Then no one will be to blame for continuing random price hikes.
English

I don't get the dependence on ChatGPT. Like... you can make purchases directly from Walmart's website. You could already make direct purchases prior to ChatGPT. Does ChatGPT *tell* people what to buy or something?? I truly don't understand the usage of it.
Pop Crave@PopCrave
Walmart partners with OpenAl so people can make purchases directly through ChatGPT.
English

@JennaFights4You So you aren't human if you don't get affirmations that you're a woman when you are a man? Asking for a friend...
English

Many comments are saying, "No one is denying you humanity."
When you say that trans women are not women and that you're just "stating biology," that is denying us our humanity.
This isn't complicated to understand.
Jenna Taylor ♀️@JennaLizzy
Gender Critical ideology does not engage in good-faith reasoning. It denies our humanity while insisting we benefit from the systems that oppress us. That inversion is not accidental. It is their means of control. When freedom is denied to some, it is secure for none.
English

Artists should not own their work.
The idea that a song, image, or paragraph can be fenced off as territory is one of the most corrosive superstitions still defended with a straight face.
“Intellectual property” is the claim that you may control other people’s actual, physical property because you once arranged vibrations or pixels in a pleasing way and now demand rent forever.
That is a legal hallucination built for monopolists.
“My ego and my revenue expectations give me veto power over what you do with your machine and your mind.”
Absurd.
Culture stagnates under that regime. Every great artist you admire learned by absorbing others, imitating, rearranging, stealing tricks, and pushing them further. Yet many of these same people demand a force field around their own output, as if they stand at the end of history and the ladder must now be pulled up.
AI arrives and hits the exposed nerve. Models drink in the public internet, learn patterns, and spit out new combinations. The reaction from a loud segment of artists has been nothing short of pure hubris.
They speak as if they own every pixel that even leans toward their style, as if their personal discomfort justifies throttling a technology that could give billions cheap access to beauty, design, education, translation, and expression.
There was never a coherent theory of ownership behind this, only a feeling of entitlement padded by law and lobbyists. Once the scarcity illusion cracked, the philosophy underneath showed itself for what it is: nothing at all.
English

@Sandford_Police @X If genitals are not associated with gender identity, then why does cutting them off affirm gender? I'll wait.
English

We are currently monitoring a number of @X accounts as the posts are concerning and may demonstrate wrong thoughts that are contrary to the general publics allowed attitude in the United Kingdom
English










