



Chaitanya
40.1K posts







The coin of Mathura (100 BC), mention on it in brahmi script the shivalya is built by Brahmins. brahmi - (ब्रा) ह्म णा न (ा) गि रि श (स्) थ(ा) न. Girish - shiva @Param_Chaitanya @monidipadey @MumukshuSavitri @kalyan97 @GemsOfIndology @sarojbala044






Kharoshthi inscription from Gandhara dated old Saka era Mention the people with Vedic names 1 पिपल खअण कुवा 2 रथितरस वयुलस पुकरिणी Pippala dug a well & Vayula of Rathitara made a pond Pippalada is related to Atharvaveda & Rathitara family is mentioned in Taittariya Upanishada





In his Arthashastra, Kautilya mentions the following temples of Gods, which are to be constructed within the city : 1. Durga ( Aparājitā), 2. Vishnu ( Aparatitha), 3. Jayanta, 4. Indra, 5. Shiva, 6. Vaisravana, 7. Asvins, 8. Lakshmi and Madirā. The above proves the presence of temples in BCE era. However, these temples are no longer there, as they were constructed of wood.














The Boghazköy Inscription Mentioning Vedic Deities The inscription from Boghazköy (Mitanni) that mentions Vedic deities is discussed in numerous places; however, its official photograph is rarely seen anywhere. Most inscriptions from Boghazköy are published in the Catalogue des textes hittites, but they are primarily available as eye-copied (hand-drawn) plates. According to published material, the names of Vedic deities appear on two specific inscriptions: KBo 1.1: On the Reverse (Rev.), from the end of line 55 to line 56. KBo 1.3: On the Reverse (Rev.), starting from the middle of line 24. There are minor textual variations between the two. I have presented both eye-copied illustrations. Although I am not familiar with the Cuneiform script, I have highlighted the lines in the images where the names of the Vedic gods likely appear. Observations Supporting This Identification: Consistency in Divine Names: While there are textual variations between KBo 1.3 and KBo 1.1, the phrase ilāni Mi-it-ra-aš-ši-il (The Mitanni-Mitra gods) remains consistent. In KBo 1.3, this begins in the middle of the line, whereas in KBo 1.1, it starts at the end of line 55. We can see this identical line in both drawings, even though I cannot provide a full transliteration. Repetitive Suffixes: In KBo 1.3, the term aš-ši-il appears repeatedly. In the cuneiform image, one can clearly observe a specific word/cluster repeating frequently. The Nasatya (Ashvins) Reference: Line 24 of KBo 1.3 ends with Na-ša-at-ti-ia-an-na. I have attempted to highlight this line in the image. In this word, the beginning and ending signs are the same ("Na"). This symmetry is visible in the drawing. I have indicated the transliteration of the middle five signs based on the available text. This is likely the mention of the Nasatya deities in the inscription. @Aatma_the_soul4 @AbhayK70627 @anshikashukla_ @tapeshyadav_usa @yajnadevam @kalyan97 @Param_Chaitanya @ProfVemsani @vedik_Arya_ @IndicMeenakshi



Chanakya was Advisor to Chandragupta Maurya, whose Greeko-Roman name was "Sandrokoptos" Chandragupta married Durdhara, a Selucid Greek Princess whose son was Bindusara. Bindusara married a Greek Princess, giving birth to Ashoka the Great Only if Sanghis read Indian History 🤦





