Eternity

We have 2 markets. Same rules - different clarifications. Traders get screwed over. Let's sink into it. First market — "What will Trump say during Fox Business interview on April 15?". We have rules - "The resolution source will be video of the events. Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution." And we have clarification - "Prerecorded footage from this interview will qualify toward this market's resolution if it is aired within timeframe." Second market - "What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?" We have rules - "The resolution source will be video of the events. Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution." And we have clarification - “only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market’s resolution.” Markets have the SAME rules, but a different clarification. It's a serious violation of market integrity. It's impossible to traded fair when no can predict how rules of market is has to be meant. The clarification on the market "What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?" was issued WRONGLY, without due diligence. We got totally ghosted by the Polymarket team. Draw attention to this matter. We expect Polymarket to refund the YES-holders of the market "What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?".

I'm familiar. I don't get it. If you end evidence collection at the deadline, you GUARANTEE false resolutions every so often. Why would a prediction market want a system that spits out predictable bullshit? In fact, what the hell are you two even talking about? Because the trend of Poly is AGAINST ending evidence collection at deadline 😂 The trend is extending evidence collection to get the correct answer. Ending evidence at the deadline is an artifact of a much dumber and much worse time.

@community_fist @0xDinoCrypto @cz_binance @star_okx @benbybit @brian_armstrong @AutismCapital @tier10k @WatcherGuru @WuBlockchain @CoinDesk @TheBlockCo @Protos i'm joking bro.

@ParetoPrincipl @0xDinoCrypto @cz_binance @star_okx @benbybit @brian_armstrong @AutismCapital @tier10k @WatcherGuru @WuBlockchain @CoinDesk @TheBlockCo @Protos Avoiding questions like these is exactly one of the main advantages of crypto, isn't it?

Good article, but refunding is impossible at this point unless it got very complex and specific. To be honest, the best solution is to essentially break the old system right now and expire it Yes, but Polymarket is extremely unlikely to do that. That would take balls and an ability to acknowledge that their system is now broken (they have never acknowledged this in a significant way, only paid lip service to "improvements" which never come). I think you're also glossing over the fact that Kalshi has had very similar screw ups in the past, and appears to be none the wiser...in fact, the opposite. But you're essentially right on abandoning the old system, and there will be a first mover advantage to the market that fixes the oracle and implements a rulebook (a rulebook that is oriented around truth and common sense as the first principles, not byzantine fine print nonsense that is currently en vogue on both sites). Institutional money is never going to enter event markets if these sites can't make their oracles predictable and hedgeable. Imagine if Goldman Sachs owned 10 million shares of Yes May 31st as a hedge against some other investment. You think they would tolerate losing to some discord insider nonsense where an entirely new rule is invented by someone who is probably paid less than their secretaries? It beggars belief.

We are launching a 10,000 USDT Support Fund for users affected by the recent Polymarket MicroStrategy settlement case. 𝕏 Space happening today — June 3 at 14:00 UTC: x.com/i/spaces/1dKrP… Details in thread. 🧵 #Polymarket #MicroStrategy

@0xDinoCrypto Never give up

Polymarket has still given no real response. So I’m asking for help now. If you are a journalist, KOL, lawyer, crypto researcher, former Polymarket user, or anyone who can help push this further, please contact: polymarketfraud@outlook.com We need media coverage. We need legal review. We need affected users to speak up. We need people who understand markets, law, and public pressure. This cannot stay as one trader shouting into the void. If written rules can be ignored after money is in, every trader is exposed. We have to take this further. #StopPolyScam Rule before trade.

@0xDinoCrypto Push hard bro!

If UMA fails users, this does not end. Next steps: Formal notice. FTC record. Media outreach. Evidence preservation. Affected trader registry. Legal review. Collective action intake. A bad oracle outcome does not erase the written rule. #StopPolyScam

Generate your own loss card here: polymarketfraud.xyz/card Show your amount. Share your story. Make it visible. #StopPolyScam

@0xDinoCrypto @Polymarket Bro, it's verified numbers? Why your number is 5 billion?

RT @0xDinoCrypto: Today I’m officially launching #StopPolyScam. This is for every trader who trusted the written rules and got ignored. T…

@willo2_Poly Read Term of Service on Polymarket - it's completely bullshit. Panama jurisdiction is dead end.

@ParetoPrincipl Radio silence.

Good morning guys. If you keep a market open for trading, you should accept evidence that comes out within that timeframe. If my trades were valid, The legally issued proof from MSTR should be as well. Otherwise you're scamming users. Do the right thing Polymarket

@willo2_Poly Yeah, bro, we went through the same thing. It's not first time, and not last.

Guys, thank you for all the support. It's been a long day, I was hoping that people would understand my perspective but I didn't expect the level of solidarity that I would find from CT. I'm going to keep fighting for all YES holders. We will win against Polymarket. 🐦

@0xDinoCrypto @shayne_coplan @Polymarket @ICE_Markets @NYSE Let's go, bro!

This is an open message to Polymarket, its CEO, and its institutional backers. @shayne_coplan @Polymarket @ICE_Markets @NYSE Polymarket already has enough regulatory history. Do not create another one. The CFTC previously ordered Polymarket to pay $1.4M and cease violating CFTC rules. Reuters later reported an FBI raid on Shayne Coplan’s home in connection with a DOJ investigation. Now traders are asking a simple question: where did the written rule say MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31? It did not. I bought 49,695.76 YES shares because the written rule said YES if MicroStrategy sold any Bitcoin by May 31. It did not say “publicly disclosed by May 31.” If an unwritten disclosure requirement can be added after the outcome, then no prediction market is safe. This is no longer just about one trader or one market. It is about market integrity, consumer protection, and whether institutional investors should tolerate post-outcome rule reinterpretation. I am preserving all evidence for journalists, lawyers, regulators, and affected traders. If Polymarket chooses to ignore the written rule, I am prepared to commit every resource I lawfully can to pursue this matter for as long as necessary. This will not disappear quietly. I am prepared for a long legal, regulatory, and public accountability process if that is what it takes to defend the rights of affected traders. Do the right thing. Resolve by the written rule. Rule before trade.

can a @Polymarket executive or associated individual explain what you’re going to do about this? platform trust heading lower if we’re still resolving markets like this, and now serious alternatives exist this is code red