๐๐๐๐จ๐๐ค๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐ค๐ค
13K posts
@RealIsBrown
Words sharper than swords. I like tinkering with machines and minds, especially when I find a few loose screws. All thoughts here are mine. Go get your own.
๐ฎ๐ท๐ธ๐ฆ๐บ๐ธ I'll buy the argument that Iran's targeting of AN/TPY-2 radars early in the war was part of a concerted campaign intended to neutralize high-end BMD sensors, but I think it is a stretch to characterize the reported damage to a USAF E-3 AEW&C aircraft as Iran undertaking something to the effect of an "asymmetric counter-air campaign." It was likely a target of opportunity, with IRGC planners being perfectly content if a KC-135, or even a "mere" chartered 737 or 767 that delivered military personnel and/or equipment, was damaged, if not destroyed, instead of an E-3. Granted, I can see how and why someone taking an unmistakably American perspective/POV might view this incident as evidence of a concerted Iranian "counter-air campaign," but I think this is the result of mirror imaging and hindsight. These strikes are not new. There have been reported Iranian strikes against al-Kharj/Prince Sultan airbase in Saudi Arabia for some time now. Why were the "usual suspects" not talking about a concerted Iranian "counter-air campaign" before reports/satellite imagery emerged of damage to aircraft on the sprawling apron at this Saudi airbase near Riyadh (and after we had reports of attacks against al-Kharj/Prince Sultan)?
Kash Patel ๐บ๐คฃ
American soldiers are experiencing profound sadness. They are reluctant to lay down their lives for Israel.
Marco Rubio: "Unlike them, we're hitting military targets"
JUST IN: US-Israeli attack targets major water source in western Iran.
American pilot Tyler Gerres was killed in an Iranian missile strike at the Al-Kharj military base in Riyadh, which also claimed the lives of several other soldiers. Tyler Gerres carried out the first airstrike on Tehran and is accused of the war crime of bombing a girlsโ school, which resulted in the deaths of 150 female students.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: NATO wasnโt there for us. We send billions of dollars to them every year to protect them. We would have always been there for them. But based on their actions, I guess we donโt have to be, do we? Why would we be there for them if theyโre not there for us?
Itโs cannot be understated how unfathomably cooked we are if we canโt even get basic voter ID laws passed in this country.
BREAKING: A number of U.S. Marines were captured on the Iranian island of Kharg during a failed landing attempt And the capture was carried out successfully.
