SP13 ๐ฆ๐ฑ ๐ฆ
30.2K posts
SP13 ๐ฆ๐ฑ ๐ฆ
@SP13V2
Cavs | Bayern | OSU Football | Leclerc | Purdue ECE
Ndiaye has a lot of potential
in that single moment he finally remembered why langdon had been his golden boy for the past five years. he has always been a kickass doctor and robbyโs heir, drugs or no drugs. which is why robby is so eaten by the guilt of not noticing the signs of his addiction.
oh! look who finally thinks that being publicly berated by your superior is a good instruction tactic!
like she is clearly competent and has been dealing with this for 35 years she worked in an active war zone, i think she can handle the ed
Sonny Styles gets a lot of loveโIโm not there. A lot of it is measurables. On tape, heโs still learning the LB position. Not great vs. the run, better in coverage (which makes sense after the safety conversion). Missed 19 tackles in 2024 thatโs alarming. And in the playoff game vs. Miami, he got dominated. No real impact. Heโll still go high, but I donโt see an elite NFL MLB.
@dripseasonthree I was pretty obviously joking - itโs not actually โdisturbingโ at all, itโs just super weird because he has never been a very impactful player but heโs gonna go down as a Top 10 career scorer ever Believe it or not, my goal was not to hurt DeMarโs feelings when I tweeted that
During the NBA GM meeting this week, one person suggested make the bottom three teams ineligible for the top picks entirely. The league, per multiple sources, found this to be way too extreme. But then another person on the call offered a softer version of the same concept: What if the bottom three teams just had slightly lower odds than the teams ranked four through 10? Not zero. Just a little less. Sources on the call say Adam Silver responded enthusiastically to this idea. Which speaks to the state of lottery reform. The 18 team/8% odds for the top 10 concept is simply still just the concept. The specifics of it will change by the time the league votes on it in late May. And adjustments โ like this one โ are still in heavy consideration. I think itโs brilliant. Under that structure, with the bottom three teams having slightly worse odds, there is no longer a single point in the standings where losing helps you. Tanking all the way to the bottom hurts you a bit. Itโs not quite relegation that youโd see in the Premier League, but itโs the NBAโs own form that would punish being the worst in the league. And much like Premier League teams have entertaining games to prevent relegation, NBA teams would too. Picture two bad teams in late March, both within a game of the bottom three, both desperate to win. That's a win for the fans. Picture the front office of the Wizards doing the calculus on whether to shut down Trae Young and Anthony Davis and realizing that, actually, no, the vets need to go play, because falling in the standings is a real cost now, not a reward. That's a win for the sport. Picture Sacramento intentionally fouling Seth Curry late in a game, and the conversation around it shifting from "nefarious tanking" to "bad coaching." That's a win for the league. More on @YahooSports: