

Sidney Edelbroek
275 posts

@Sidpolymath
Hyper-Spatial Meat Computer😁 First-principles & Fluid Dynamics. Constraint Annihilator, Eternal Optimist. Rolling Stones saucer to Volumetric XXX Chip Designer



@elonmusk VERY complex infrastructure design. I am Dutch (background roads & waterways), more canals than roads infrastructure can be 900 years old... 2-way traffic in 1-way size street, 100.000's bicycles, pedestrians... it's a navigation nightmare! FSD doing it, IS AMAZING. full stop.










NEWS: Dutch regulators (RDW), which just approved @Tesla FSD (Supervised) in the Netherlands, have just issued an official statement: "Due to the continuous strict monitoring of the driver in the vehicle, the system is safer than other driver assistance systems. We have thoroughly researched and checked this system, more than a year and a half. The RDW has issued a type approval for Tesla's driver's assistance system, FSD Supervised. This driver's assistance system has been extensively researched and tested on our test track and on public roads for more than a half years. Safety is paramount for the RDW. The proper use of this driver's system makes a positive contribution to road safety." This approval from the RDW clears the path for approval in other European countries. Tesla owners in the Netherlands will be receiving FSD (Supervised) on their cars shortly. Amazing day!



Something strange with the Artemis II splash down... The capsule is "venting" high pressure flames it keeps "dropping"out of frame. Withing seconds the capsule is submerged 2/3 below water and it looks like the astronauts are OUTSIDE when camera "loses control" framing/focus. I mean you can see them moving around (it's not a static element outside the capsule) Then it goes to full "white out", cuts to footage of capsule just floating (could be inserted of just filmed right after splashdown before Astronauts came out). Then cuts to recovery vessel footage and when they cut back to capsule it looks totally different 1:36:21 time-code for flames shooting out. 1:38:03 time-code for astronauts outside. 1:38:09 to 1:38:17 you can see the parachute on the left side of the frame sinking below the water surface 1:38:23 all parachutes are fully visible and not just above the surface but with air trapped in it... Then when it cuts back from a very "unprofessional" set of jumps cuts at the end of the recovery vessel footage it cuts back to the capsule all parachutes are gone and the lighting is very very different, surface refraction is also totally different as is the amount of buoyancy of the capsule (sits much higher) and it now has all 5 buoyancy airbags deployed... which was supposed to happen immediately after splash down I don't know for sure... could be perfectly innocent explication, but to me something seems very off with this... thoughts? @elonmusk @palmerluckey @traestephens @benjitaylor @nikitabier x.com/NASA/status/20…



Something strange with the Artemis II splash down... The capsule is "venting" high pressure flames it keeps "dropping"out of frame. Withing seconds the capsule is submerged 2/3 below water and it looks like the astronauts are OUTSIDE when camera "loses control" framing/focus. I mean you can see them moving around (it's not a static element outside the capsule) Then it goes to full "white out", cuts to footage of capsule just floating (could be inserted of just filmed right after splashdown before Astronauts came out). Then cuts to recovery vessel footage and when they cut back to capsule it looks totally different 1:36:21 time-code for flames shooting out. 1:38:03 time-code for astronauts outside. 1:38:09 to 1:38:17 you can see the parachute on the left side of the frame sinking below the water surface 1:38:23 all parachutes are fully visible and not just above the surface but with air trapped in it... Then when it cuts back from a very "unprofessional" set of jumps cuts at the end of the recovery vessel footage it cuts back to the capsule all parachutes are gone and the lighting is very very different, surface refraction is also totally different as is the amount of buoyancy of the capsule (sits much higher) and it now has all 5 buoyancy airbags deployed... which was supposed to happen immediately after splash down I don't know for sure... could be perfectly innocent explication, but to me something seems very off with this... thoughts? @elonmusk @palmerluckey @traestephens @benjitaylor @nikitabier x.com/NASA/status/20…










SpaceXAI Colossus 2 now has 7 models in training: - Imagine V2 - 2 variants of 1T - 2 variants of 1.5T - 6T - 10T Some catching up to do.

Something strange with the Artemis II splash down... The capsule is "venting" high pressure flames it keeps "dropping"out of frame. Withing seconds the capsule is submerged 2/3 below water and it looks like the astronauts are OUTSIDE when camera "loses control" framing/focus. I mean you can see them moving around (it's not a static element outside the capsule) Then it goes to full "white out", cuts to footage of capsule just floating (could be inserted of just filmed right after splashdown before Astronauts came out). Then cuts to recovery vessel footage and when they cut back to capsule it looks totally different 1:36:21 time-code for flames shooting out. 1:38:03 time-code for astronauts outside. 1:38:09 to 1:38:17 you can see the parachute on the left side of the frame sinking below the water surface 1:38:23 all parachutes are fully visible and not just above the surface but with air trapped in it... Then when it cuts back from a very "unprofessional" set of jumps cuts at the end of the recovery vessel footage it cuts back to the capsule all parachutes are gone and the lighting is very very different, surface refraction is also totally different as is the amount of buoyancy of the capsule (sits much higher) and it now has all 5 buoyancy airbags deployed... which was supposed to happen immediately after splash down I don't know for sure... could be perfectly innocent explication, but to me something seems very off with this... thoughts? @elonmusk @palmerluckey @traestephens @benjitaylor @nikitabier x.com/NASA/status/20…

Something strange with the Artemis II splash down... The capsule is "venting" high pressure flames it keeps "dropping"out of frame. Withing seconds the capsule is submerged 2/3 below water and it looks like the astronauts are OUTSIDE when camera "loses control" framing/focus. I mean you can see them moving around (it's not a static element outside the capsule) Then it goes to full "white out", cuts to footage of capsule just floating (could be inserted of just filmed right after splashdown before Astronauts came out). Then cuts to recovery vessel footage and when they cut back to capsule it looks totally different 1:36:21 time-code for flames shooting out. 1:38:03 time-code for astronauts outside. 1:38:09 to 1:38:17 you can see the parachute on the left side of the frame sinking below the water surface 1:38:23 all parachutes are fully visible and not just above the surface but with air trapped in it... Then when it cuts back from a very "unprofessional" set of jumps cuts at the end of the recovery vessel footage it cuts back to the capsule all parachutes are gone and the lighting is very very different, surface refraction is also totally different as is the amount of buoyancy of the capsule (sits much higher) and it now has all 5 buoyancy airbags deployed... which was supposed to happen immediately after splash down I don't know for sure... could be perfectly innocent explication, but to me something seems very off with this... thoughts? @elonmusk @palmerluckey @traestephens @benjitaylor @nikitabier x.com/NASA/status/20…

Something strange with the Artemis II splash down... The capsule is "venting" high pressure flames it keeps "dropping"out of frame. Withing seconds the capsule is submerged 2/3 below water and it looks like the astronauts are OUTSIDE when camera "loses control" framing/focus. I mean you can see them moving around (it's not a static element outside the capsule) Then it goes to full "white out", cuts to footage of capsule just floating (could be inserted of just filmed right after splashdown before Astronauts came out). Then cuts to recovery vessel footage and when they cut back to capsule it looks totally different 1:36:21 time-code for flames shooting out. 1:38:03 time-code for astronauts outside. 1:38:09 to 1:38:17 you can see the parachute on the left side of the frame sinking below the water surface 1:38:23 all parachutes are fully visible and not just above the surface but with air trapped in it... Then when it cuts back from a very "unprofessional" set of jumps cuts at the end of the recovery vessel footage it cuts back to the capsule all parachutes are gone and the lighting is very very different, surface refraction is also totally different as is the amount of buoyancy of the capsule (sits much higher) and it now has all 5 buoyancy airbags deployed... which was supposed to happen immediately after splash down I don't know for sure... could be perfectly innocent explication, but to me something seems very off with this... thoughts? @elonmusk @palmerluckey @traestephens @benjitaylor @nikitabier x.com/NASA/status/20…





Something strange with the Artemis II splash down... The capsule is "venting" high pressure flames it keeps "dropping"out of frame. Withing seconds the capsule is submerged 2/3 below water and it looks like the astronauts are OUTSIDE when camera "loses control" framing/focus. I mean you can see them moving around (it's not a static element outside the capsule) Then it goes to full "white out", cuts to footage of capsule just floating (could be inserted of just filmed right after splashdown before Astronauts came out). Then cuts to recovery vessel footage and when they cut back to capsule it looks totally different 1:36:21 time-code for flames shooting out. 1:38:03 time-code for astronauts outside. 1:38:09 to 1:38:17 you can see the parachute on the left side of the frame sinking below the water surface 1:38:23 all parachutes are fully visible and not just above the surface but with air trapped in it... Then when it cuts back from a very "unprofessional" set of jumps cuts at the end of the recovery vessel footage it cuts back to the capsule all parachutes are gone and the lighting is very very different, surface refraction is also totally different as is the amount of buoyancy of the capsule (sits much higher) and it now has all 5 buoyancy airbags deployed... which was supposed to happen immediately after splash down I don't know for sure... could be perfectly innocent explication, but to me something seems very off with this... thoughts? @elonmusk @palmerluckey @traestephens @benjitaylor @nikitabier x.com/NASA/status/20…