Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant

Ffs, @drrollergator never did anything as bad as be the neo-Nazi editor of The Daily Stormer

@BuckTurgids0n @MoronPundit @drrollergator @BenjaminBoyce

@MoronPundit @drrollergator @BenjaminBoyce HE ALSO DELETED THE STUPID TWEET, EVEN THOUGH WE HAVEN'T HEARD FROM @SmoothJohnny5 SINCE THEN AND I FEAR 4 HIS SAFETY.

@drrollergator is one of my favorite accounts on X. He is a true Renaissance reptile. Everyone who isn't dum should follow him and listen to his latest unshouted but still exceptional political discourse with the slightly-less-reptilian @BenjaminBoyce Also, he plays a mean recorder and is decent at VFX. Anyways, DoorDash some Arby's and have a listen! youtube.com/watch?v=krEIBZ…

I love reading fan mail. 📧

@fareesh @drrollergator

@drrollergator i am undecided until i see the vp candidate

THE GATOR CAMPAIGN HAS NEVER BEGGED 4 MONEY N HAS NEVER SOLICITED DONATIONS UNLIKE THE OTHER CANDIDATES WHO PAN-HANDLE AS A PROFESSION VOTE 4 GATOR

@deb_fillman @drrollergator @AThinksAloud And to try to use pemdas and not make the same error, if you add something with a negative symbol attached, you are adding the negative number So 20+20-10×0+2+2 20+20-0+2+2 40-0+4 And then not 0+4 but -0+4 Negative zero is zero, but preserves the relationship we need to

@deb_fillman @drrollergator @AThinksAloud 20 - 4, this does not preserve the relationship that subtraction is equal to the addition of the negative So 20 - 10×0 + 4 is equal to 20 + (-10×0) + 4 And now we can see that negative 10 times 0 is 0 and the calculation is 20+4

Most of the replies say 44 and I am starting to worry that I’m losing it. I’ve never been great at math, but isn’t it 4? I’m just doing the calculation from left to right. What are other people doing? 👀

@BjornChernobyl @drrollergator

@drrollergator WHO IS GATOR'S RUNNING MATE?

LOOK THE CHOICE IS SIMPLE U CAN VOTE 4 GATOR - THE GREATEST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY OR U CAN VOTE 4 THE NEWLY INSTALLED OPERATING SYSTEM CURRENTLY BEING LOADED WITH PROGRAMS THAT IS KAMALA OR U CAN VOTE 4 THE GUY WHO WILL HIRE THE GREATEST TEAM THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN BEFORE HE FIRES THEM ONE BY ONE N SAYS THEY WERE IDIOTS N THE WORST PERSON EVER 2 DO THE JOB WHILE THEY HEAD 2 THE FBI 2 TELL THEM ALL SORTS OF SHIT

@HHMusicOfficial I think they mostly objected to being accused of wanting to have sex with their mother.

I think people reject Freud because his ideas are unfalsifiable, and thus unscientific. Nevertheless, his keen observations profoundly influenced psychology. And for that, he deserves a song...

The highest officials within the CIA were aware of the statement prior to its publication. CIA’s Chief Operating Officer (COO) Andrew Makridis testified that he informed Director Gina Haspel or Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop about its impending release. This sequence of events suggests that senior CIA leadership had ample opportunity to assess the validity of the statement's claims. Furthermore, the COO’s office appeared to signal approval of the statement in a move that departed from standard Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) protocols. Additionally, some of the statement's signatories were on active contract with the CIA at the time they issued the statement to discredit damaging allegations about Biden family influence peddling. Despite claiming they lacked access to classified information at the time, at least two signatories—Michael Morell and former CIA Inspector General David Buckley—were actively working for the CIA as contractors. This revelation raises concerns that these officials may have abused their positions to expedite the statement's approval and may have been earning taxpayer dollars while they did it. Furthermore, officials within the CIA recognized at the time that the Hunter Biden statement was political and would hurt the Agency. The signatories’ decision to leverage their former intelligence community titles to promote a narrative about foreign election interference improperly embroiled the Agency in domestic politics. This report underscores the potential dangers of a politicized intelligence community.

"The House Intelligence Committee's work provided us with solid direct evidence that in the final weeks before the 2020 presidential election, 51 former intelligence officials coordinated with the Biden campaign to falsely cast doubt on an explosive New York Post story and label Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop as 'Russian disinformation.' The Committee worked to obtain classified documents from the CIA, including emails, and fought to include evidence of these materials in our report." -@RepMikeTurner

@SmoothJohnny5 NOT AGAIN.

The president is a political prisoner

@DavidKrae *except

@DavidKrae Well, accept that one time Gator won the appeal and was therefore permanently suspended

@DavidKrae They say he's won his appeal - but he's still locked out on a timer. Let's see what happens when the timer expires

@DavidKrae Let's see how the new guard handles it

Just remembering this one. No reason.

AI Midjourney image request: Biden at Burning Man