MelvinSnerken

@SecKennedy @DNIGabbard If people like the two of you, by some mistake, have ended up in positions of power in my country, we would storm the House, put you in straight jackets and lock you up. The fact that the American people doesnt remove you from power, it deeply concerning.

Thank you, @DNIGabbard, for exposing U.S. funded biolabs around the world. The American people deserve the truth.

Tätä kelpaa kuunnella! 🔊🔊 Noah Steenin voittomaali Norjan selostuksella. #ViaplayMMlätkä #MMkisat #lupanauttia #ihankaikki

I want to start by saying I don’t have access to official documents or meetings, so I’m piecing together their motivations based on what I observe and logical reasoning. Keep that in mind as you read on. This year, Russia's goals are threefold. First, to capture the eastern bank of the Dnipro River. Second, to capture Kostyantynivka. Third, to capture Slovyansk. Each of these goals has necessary steps. To capture the bank in Zaporizhzhia, you must first capture Orikhiv. To capture Slovyansk, you must first capture Lyman. You could argue that to capture Kostyantynivka, you must first capture Chasiv Yar. These goals are very ambitious and, honestly, impossible to fully achieve. So let’s think of them as aspirations and focus instead on how close Russia might get to reaching them.

Trump's Iran Downfall

A NATO training scenario in the Baltics took an unexpected turn. The opposing force was only ten Ukrainians. ow.ly/Y9pX30sUCI3

@SpencerHakimian Its funny though, all over Europe there is a frenzy going on, investigating all and everything related to Epstein, but not in the US. Who is protecting who?

@SpencerHakimian Now you’re going to war against Iran to get people to shut up about Epstein. Costly distractions from DJT.

🚨BREAKING: THE DOJ WILL NOT RELEASE ANYMORE EPSTEIN FILES

I would like to once again disappoint everyone dreaming of Russia destroying Ukraine -- no, if you think it will help you to impose illegal and illegitimate “elections” on Ukraine during wartime and get rid of Zelensky, you are very deeply mistaken. No, you will not be able to “install your own person” who will be “more agreeable” and quickly run to Moscow to hand Ukraine to Putin on a silver platter. Even if such a joke of “elections” were ever to take place under U.S. pressure, we would either elect Zelensky again (which is likely) as a very-far-from-perfect but still resilient wartime leader whose removal has been aggressively pushed from outside. In fact, this notorious external pressure has only mobilized support for him throughout these years. Or we would elect Zaluzhny, Budanov, or another serious candidate who would, by and large, continue the policy of resolute defense against the destruction and absorption by totalitarian fascist Russia. Because -- surprise, surprise!! -- millions of Ukrainians have been fighting or helping the country and the military in the rear for years not because they are being forced by that evil Zelensky who “doesn’t want peace,” and whose easy-peasy removal would supposedly make Ukrainians immediately raise their hands and crawl back into the GULAG. This is happening because millions of people in Ukraine are making a conscious choice to continue fighting at the front and enduring the hardships of war at home. And if you think that fighting for years against the full military power of Russia is an easy choice that does not require titanic motivation and willpower, you are, to put it mildly, very wrong. Otherwise, we would not be having this conversation now, one week before the fourth anniversary of the start of the largest war in Europe since World War II that was initially supposed to be a 10-day walk in the park with a Russian triumph in Kyiv. If you think that there are a million clones of Zelensky fighting at the front who can all be switched off with a single button, then you are either an eight-year-old kid or Donald Trump. The motivation that has sustained years of such a brutal war against such an enormous adversary will not be broken by yet another TikTok clown populist that you will try to impose, as you did in Romania. And the Ukrainian military does not have any Stalin-style "blocking detachments" or modern Russian-style "pits for cowards" (which, incidentally, is one of the reasons why the widely-discussed number of AWOLs is so high -- if someone firmly refuses to fight, sooner or later they will leave, and nobody's really going to hunt them down or prosecute them). If the people of Ukraine were not willing to fight, all of this would have ended long ago, exactly as Putin expected in 2022. Or as it happened in Afghanistan in 2021, or in Syria in 2023 -- which is what happens when an army and a people are not willing to fight for their country and their leaders. Honestly, one cannot help but be horrified by how catastrophically global politics has degraded over the past year.

@Grimillionaire @AdamKinzinger Keep up the clownshow, and enjoy you future solitary life.

@AdamKinzinger Can we admit that Adam has been on the wrong side of every fucking argument for the last five years?

Can we please agree that our ambassador to Poland is an ass hat pissing off one of our best allies? Recall him senate Americans have no clue how awful and expensive a world with no friends is

@LoganLancing @Microinteracti1 Regardless of the video, every word is spot on.

@Microinteracti1 Play the full video clip. All the Left does is Lie.

This video should unsettle anyone who takes the United States seriously as a nation. Because it exposes something dangerous: the trivialization of the world's most consequential office. It shows how carelessly the power, credibility, and accumulated moral authority of a superpower can be squandered for a few seconds of viral attention. In any other major democracy, this behavior from a head of state would trigger a constitutional crisis. Paris would burn. Berlin would convene emergency sessions. In the Nordic countries, resignation would follow within hours. Across functioning democracies, the public, institutions, and political class would recognize this for what it is: an assault on the dignity of the state itself. Leaders are not free to perform as entertainers without consequence. National honor is not personal property, it's held in trust. But the United States is not just another country with a provocateur in charge. It is the linchpin of global order. It maintains formal alliances and security guarantees with forty to fifty nations. It underwrites the financial architecture, trade systems, and diplomatic frameworks that billions of people depend on daily. When the American president speaks—or posts—it doesn't land as satire, meme, or personal whim. It reads as a signal about what the country is becoming. American power has never relied solely on carrier strike groups or economic output. It has rested on something more fragile and more valuable: trust. The belief that beneath domestic turbulence lies institutional seriousness, predictability, and a baseline commitment to dignity. That belief is now disintegrating in real time. Millions of American companies operate globally. They negotiate multibillion-dollar contracts in environments where reputation is currency. Boardrooms in Frankfurt, Singapore, and Dubai aren't debating whether a post was clever—they're asking whether the United States remains a reliable partner. Whether agreements signed today will be honored tomorrow. Whether American leadership has devolved from institutional to purely theatrical. Consider tourism, which sustains millions of American jobs—airlines, hotels, restaurants, museums, entire regional economies. Soft power isn't an abstraction. It materializes in flight bookings, conference locations, study-abroad programs, and decades of accumulated goodwill. A quiet, decentralized boycott doesn't require government action—only a collective sense that a nation no longer respects itself. Now picture this image being studied by foreign ministers, central bank governors, defense strategists, and sovereign wealth fund managers. Picture them asking a coldly rational question: How do we write binding thirty-year agreements with a country whose public face will be this, relentlessly, for years to come? How do we plan for the long term when the tone is impulsive, mocking, and unbound by the gravity of office? This is where the real calculus begins. Trillions in foreign capital depend on confidence that America is stable, credible, and rule-governed. That confidence is now being traded for what, exactly? Applause from an online mob? A dopamine rush from manufactured outrage? Content designed to dominate the news cycle rather than serve the national interest? Every serious nation eventually confronts this choice: burn long-term credibility for short-term spectacle, or safeguard the reputation previous generations bled to build. The United States spent eighty years constructing an image of reliability, restraint, and leadership under pressure. That image wasn't born from perfection—it came from a visible commitment to standards that transcended impulse. This isn't a partisan issue. Europeans who value democratic norms recognize something ominously familiar here. Americans—Democrat and Republican alike—who believe in responsibility and restraint should see it too. Power attracts scrutiny. Leadership demands discipline. A superpower cannot behave like a reality TV contestant without paying a price. The presidency is not a personal broadcast channel. It's a symbol carried on behalf of 330 million people and countless international partners who never voted but whose lives are shaped by American decisions anyway. Every post either reinforces or erodes the idea that America can be counted on when it matters most. So the question is no longer whether this is offensive. The question is whether this is who America chooses to be: a nation that trades a century of hard-won reputation for viral moments. A country that replaces statecraft with content creation. A republic governed like a season of reality television. History offers a harsh lesson here. Great powers don't fall because enemies mock them. They collapse when they begin mocking themselves—publicly, proudly, and without grasping the cost until it's far too late. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1

@SpencerHakimian Who’s deranged?

🚨BREAKING: TRUMP DEFENDS PAM BONDI

@NoDeamer @secretsqrl123 @grok Norway buys Chunmoo. Its a shift from US weapons for sure.

@secretsqrl123 @grok That’s okay, I assume they are all good systems built off of tech the US has had since the 90s. Doesn’t dispute the fact that the HIMARS is still the top system in its field and continues to advance along with its peers

and just like that the age of the himars is over... the world is refusing to buy the himars or any US made launcher like they were just 2 years ago.. what changed?

@Bricktop_NAFO If I had felt so unsafe that I felt the need to go buy myself an AR-15, I would move to another, more safe, country. Colombia or Afghanistan, as an example, where gun violence is not so normal.

🚨You need to see this 🚨

@SpencerHakimian ec.europa.eu/commission/pre… Times are changing….

So every single “trade deal” he made since April was fake and never went into effect in the first place?

@SpencerHakimian This is not an apology. Its a shameful and cowardly atempt to avoid making an official apology. A lot of countries lost soldiers in Afganistan and Iraq, even Syria, and Trump spits on all of them. Europeans are infuriated by his mindless remarks. This wont be fixed easily.

🚨BREAKING: In PATHETIC FASHION, Trump FINALLY apologies to our NATO Allies who DIED FIGHTING in Afghanistan.

Good take by @portnikov: "I have no doubts that in real negotiations, a criminal attack on civilians would be grounds to refuse to continue them and to pursue other diplomatic demarches. But the problem is that what we are witnessing today is not real negotiations. It is an attempt by Ukraine and its European allies to prevent the Trump administration from accusing Kyiv of being unwilling to achieve peace, walking away from the process, and even cutting off assistance to Ukraine. So in reality, we are negotiating with the Americans. The Russians are there as mere furniture, and they have the same task we do: to convince Trump of their “peace-loving” intentions simply by being present. And the fact that Washington prefers not to notice Russia’s attacks on Ukraine during these talks is something the American participants will have to answer for. And finally: will there ever be real negotiations with Russia? The objective prerequisites for that are practically absent in the coming years, even if the enemy’s economic and military potential is significantly reduced. More likely, we will be dealing with a gradual fading of the war, and our main efforts should be focused on actions aimed at exhausting Russia’s resources. Participation in an imitation negotiating process in order to prevent the United States from abandoning pressure on Moscow is an essential part of those efforts."

@KobeissiLetter And er Are back to threatening allies again. How long did it last? 24hrs? How Are you guys not impeaching this idiot, he’s destroying everything he lays his eyes on.

President Trump 8 Days Ago: "If Canada can get a trade deal with China, they should do that." President Trump Today: "If Canada makes a deal with China, it will immediately be hit with a 100% tariff."

@RevengeofRatMan @AndrewPerpetua Whole milk will do that to you, its a grossly underestimated superdrug. And I agree, best speech ever, all the pieces fell into place. Goat

@AndrewPerpetua It was a great speech, the best speech anyone ever gave at Davos. That's what the Doctors told me. They said, how can you give just a great speech after your flight was delayed. And I said, I drink whole milk, whole with a "w"

Everyone who voted for trump should be required by law to be strapped down to a chair and listen to his speech today 5,000 times in a row.