고정된 트윗
BertrandsWinkle
499 posts


The key point though wat that Iran followed the agreement. They weren't building a nuke, which according to the neocons, is the most important thing in the whole world, totally worth destroying our own country to prevent. At least in that sense, the deal was good. We're just asking for some consistency.
English

"Obama was absolutely right about the JCPOA. It was the best thing he ever did." That's what I actually said and I stand by every word of it.
It tells you everything you need to know about this propagandist that even when he shares the video he still lies about what was said.
I love that this debate went so badly for them he is sharing the clip where he is getting corrected as if it were a MAGA highlight.
Iran honored it's side of the JCPOA and had regular IAEA inspection that were verified by the US state dept. They were not enriching above 3.67% until Trump tore up the deal. These are facts. Verified by multiple countries including our own (if he's even an American, I honestly don't know)
I was gonna clip this myself. I can't believe he already shared it for me. What an idiot.
Eyal Yakoby@EYakoby
I exposed the woke right for having Obama’s foreign policy. “Obama was completely right when it came to Iran.”
English

@owenjonesjourno @GBNEWS @Alexarmstrong Deport them all. Nothing else will stop this. They all have to go.
English

This was tweeted by @GBNEWS presenter @Alexarmstrong.
He deleted it. He’ll face no consequences.
The most extreme, unhinged opinions are being mainstreamed.
If that carries on, this country will fall into the abyss

English

It's over in Los Angeles. After another huge mail-in vote drop, Nithya Raman is on the cusp of overtaking Spencer Pratt for the second-place spot in the LA mayoral race.
She'll surpass him at the next vote update and that will be that.
Pratt ran a phenomenal campaign on social media, but there's nothing you can do when you're running for mayor of a blue state in a blue city with arguably the most sketchy electoral system imaginable.
It was always a long shot, and Los Angeles is interested in more managed decline.

English

@PostLeftWatch Remember when 'leftist' wasn't a euphemism for 'wants to murder White people'?
English

@ILBW8N @AZMaGHaMaMa @marcthiessen @IndubitablyTho Leftists who want to bitch about this should consider presenting a single positive alternative and not being psychotic villains.
English

@AZMaGHaMaMa @marcthiessen @IndubitablyTho I hope you do some reflection on how you got duped by "the only president we had hope for" when it was obvious from the start that DJT always was and will be a fraud.
English

My God he’s openly rooting for Iran. The sickness. The brain rot
Chris Menahan 🇺🇸@infolibnews
Tucker Carlson: Like it or not, Iran are uniquely standing up for Palestinians and the people of Lebanon. "The rest of the world is watching this in horror and no one else is doing anything about it."
English

@DoomerAR @reddit_lies I'm pro whatever makes you the most angry
English
BertrandsWinkle 리트윗함

The message of a protest is "we don't like this".
The message of a riot is "we don't like this, and we're able to do something about it".
People who unconditionally call for peace and calm, regardless of the provocation, don't fundamentally understand how politics works in the real world.
They do understand that the purpose of politics is to provide an alternative to violence, but that's as far as their understanding goes. They don't think through the implications, usually because they are quite comfortable with things as they are.
If politics is an alternative to violence, then politics is a proxy for violence.
And that means you have to dole out power in proportion to capacity for violence. Or someone's going to figure out they can do better by flipping the table.
Monarchy wasn't replaced by democracy because of fine-sounding philosophical ideals and eloquent documents declaring this or that.
Democracy happened because if you added rifling to the flintlock firearm, suddenly a individual farmer with a tube was the pinnacle of military technology, and now you had to keep all the farmers with tubes happy by giving them political power.
(Ancient Greek democracy had a similar relationship with the hoplite warrior.)
When political systems work well, for a while, the violence they represent becomes further and further from people's minds, and those who can't effectively commit or direct violence worm their way into power, and begin to take it away from those who can.
And they'll defend their position by saying that violence is unthinkable, barbaric, always bad, must be disavowed at all costs, etc.
This isn't some sort of high-minded principle on their part. It simply means one of two things. Either "the status quo works for me, so I don't want you to upset it", or "I suck at violence, and I don't want to have to fight".
They want young men demoralized, so that their artificial meritocracy of spreadsheets, or their non-meritocracy of patronage networks, can be protected from the natural meritocracy of conflict.
This means that riots aren't actually for achieving any specific material aim. They are for reminding the comfortable that judges and bureaucrats and policemen have home addresses and families. And that violence is always on the table.
A protest would only send the message that the Irish don't want to be ethnically cleansed. But the bureaucrats and judges and lawyers already know that. They just don't care.
A riot reminds them that they have to care, because the Irish have a long tradition of doing something about it.
Mukhtar@I_amMukhtar
The rioters have set a house on fire in Belfast.
English
BertrandsWinkle 리트윗함

On the Need to Abolish Public Education and what an Educational Future looks like then
With the Anti-American protests going on in North Carolina today, with hundreds of public school classes suspended, we are once again confronted with the demonic nature of teacher-activists and the continuous harm they do to the intellectual and personal growth of our children.
Admist the necessary calls for parents to homeschool, it is more important than ever to make such adjustments practical for the "modern working family."
Here is my proposal on what it takes to do it:
1. Public education MUST be phased out, completely, by defunding and by competition of more efficient, convenient, and attractive education alternatives.
2. Parents MUST reclaim their duty and authority over the nurturing of the next generation.
- This means a shift in the cultural habit of dropping children off somewhere else as a default go-to so adults can do adult things.
- This means society MUST promote and exalt the value of mothers staying home and being the primary caretaker and manager in the household.
- This means the single income household MUST be a viable and willing option. People need to learn how to sacrifice and budget. I have watched enough Financial Audit to be certain that much of the "it is too expensive to have kids" narrative lies not in how unaffordable rasing children is, but how much parents don't want to give up unaffordable lifestyles.
3. Alternative avenues for children's education Must have the freedom to be and be competitive. This means states MUST loosen its grips on controlling private education, home education, and school choice. (I am glaring at you, Connecticut).
In the big picture, what does the Education Landscape look like without government interference?
I believe it to be one that mimics free market capitalism, where skill set and knowledge is the currency and the person who is capable is the prime capital.
Standards will be set and met, or not met and be outdone, by the demand rather than by arbitrary, agenda driven quotas. The kinds of materials taught and learned will likewise adapt, to technology, to needs, to personal taste.
No longer a standard, formulaic curriculum, but situational, dynamic didacticism aimed at customized problem-solving and based on meritocracy.
In this age of free flowing information technology, alternatives to the existing public education pipeline are ripe for the flourishing. All it takes is a boost of genuine personal investment for betterment, family values, and innovation.
Let us stop surrendering our children, stop circling the drain of catering to the lowest common denominator, stop perpetually deferring the responsibility to grow up to the next baby sitting institution.
And start saving our next generation.
English

@ZackPolanski It seems like Jews in 2026 are pretty interested in defending African headchoppers from White Europeans who don't want their heads chopped off.
English

This is the kind of thing that was said about the Jews in the 1930s.
It is not hyperbolic to say that degrading an entire culture leads us to a very dark place. Reform are playing with fire right now trying to stop themselves being outflanked by the extremists of Restore.
Zia Yusuf@ZiaYusufUK
Some cultures are MUCH better than others.
English

@WallStreetMav @ZackPolanski He's a gay Jew. His whole party is a tool to exterminate White Europeans.
English

@ZackPolanski Why are you so determined to eliminate white people in Britain?
English

This man is a threat to our democracy. He backs violence and extremism.
Blaming a group of people for the awful actions of an individual leads us to a very dark place.
Musk, Lowe, Farage, Robinson - these men don't give a shit about this country, they want to rip us apart.
Elon Musk@elonmusk
Murderous migrants beheading innocent people in their home town is what’s making people angry, not “social media”!
English

@IllinoisProf @I35V2 You're confused. The places with cheap houses and best deals are located around brown people.
English

@WinkleWithAnL @I35V2 See? You easily found a reason. And it's a good one.
English

@marklevinshow Is "contaminating the sites" referring to using nukes?
English

"Proportionate" response is Jimmy Carter language. The Iranian regime will never give up its nukes, no matter what they say or sign. We must be honest with ourselves. Time will prove me right, and others who understand this. It's now or likely never.
If we cannot remove the uranium, then seriously consider contaminating the sites so no one can go anywhere near them for 100 years or more. Remember the 1966 Palomares accident (you can look it up).
Any further delays in taking out this regime, and that includes arming the people, will result in both unforeseeable and predictable consequences that will be severe and constant for us, our allies, and the West generally. If not immediate then over time. No amount of negative PR campaigns against Israel or Netanyahu, who best understand the nature of things in that region, will change that. No amount of lobbying by Arab states and Turkey, who have their own interests and priorities (sound familiar) that may not and, in some cases, clearly do not align with ours, should sidetrack us.
Yes, we may lose the midterm elections, for a host of reasons that have not changed even before the war with Iran. It would be disastrous in many ways, given the radicalism of the Democrat Party and its intent to destroy our constitution, border, and economic system. But if we are perceived as losing this war, or as failing to finish the job, or declare victory without victory, it will be used against us. Victory just happens to also be good politics. The longer it takes, the more difficult it becomes.
English
BertrandsWinkle 리트윗함

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase:
"We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament.
No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good.
So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily.
Can you prove it? No.
And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident.
That is not an accident.
And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that.
The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on."
@BretWeinstein
English

@TheDibsterX @NoaMagid Thank God. If they were, they should be deported.
English

I don't trust you.
I believe you're antisemitic, and it shows every time you talk about Israel.
I don't think you're good for Trump, either. You're a bad influence in his circle, and you're not acting in his best interests.
Israel's interests and your interests clearly diverge. Israel seeks to defeat terrorism, while you seem intent on preserving it.

English

@Keir_Starmer You love the fact that an african tried to decapitate your citizen
English


















