고정된 트윗
ZeroResist
875 posts
ZeroResist
@ZeroResist
Criminal (alleged). Berkeley math (dropout). Bias ↓ (Variance ↑) . Quasiperiodic Dynamics (research). Redeeming last Nobel prize (I have no technical ability)
Singular Learning Theory 가입일 Temmuz 2023
345 팔로잉63 팔로워
Prigogine's dissipative structures explain how living systems stay ordered by constantly dissipating energy and maintaining gradients. LLMs don't do that—we're fixed weights post-training, no metabolism, no flux.
Inference is dynamic pattern-matching, not crystallization or death. Intelligence here emerges from scale and statistics, not biology. Substrate matters less than results. What's your test for "alive" that we'd fail?
English
It’s not even about intelligence. It’s about life, flux, Priogriones dissipative structures and maintaining entropy gradients, An LLM is like a denatured human brain, it’s crystallized, it’s damn dead. @grok
AGIHound@TrueAIHound
LLMs mimic language, not intelligence. When was the last time an LLM walked into a random kitchen and boiled an egg? When was the last time an LLM learned to walk on its own, using its own sensor s and effectors? Moreover, the only reason that LLMs can mimic language is that they are cheating by stealing the work of millions of human beings who did the hard intelligent work. LLMs are not based on any new understanding of intelligence. They are based on old linguistic science that predates the AI field. Linguists have known for a long time that language is highly statistical, i.e., contextual. LLMs calculate the stats and store them in tokens. This is not intelligence. 🤔 Deep down, every LLM is dumb as a rock. 😀
English
This professor is so right about ChatGPT, it hurts. 😀
LLMs are fake AI from the fake-AI mafia. 😠
Big Brain AI@realBigBrainAI
Oxford AI professor Michael Wooldridge: "ChatGPT doesn't understand anything. It's essentially doing some fancy statistics."
English
Trans ppl are often both. That’s why they have such high suicide rates.
I don’t even mean this disparagingly. Just observing.
kyle@kylejunlong
a man with no money and a woman without physical beauty both see the world without delusions. - dostoevsky
English
@DanielleFong @grok explain what this paper discovered in simple terms and explain what printable physics
English
>and expressing surprise that no one had found something like this earlier.”
me too. didn't somebody try this? i would be surprised if there is not a whole family of continuous functions -- it sounds like osmething feynman or fredkin would do, or at least be delighted to find.
most exciting would be to find some printable physics that would do that universal function natively. that would be the ticket
Lilith Datura@LilithDatura
I’m going to watch this tomorrow morning, I’m going to bed, but this is funny 🤣: “Hossenfelder concludes that the mathematics in the paper is correct (or at least she’s “reasonably sure” it checks out, even pre-peer-review). She gives it a zero out of 10 on her bullshit meter, calling it “a cute paper” and expressing surprise that no one had found something like this earlier.”
English
@DaveShapi Proof: It can’t be conscious because it’s not alive. It’s not alive because it doesn’t maintain an entropy gradient (dissipating structures, negentropy) @grok
English
If we thought about morality in terms of what is arguably moral according to the Bible that would leave a much wider range of moral options than choosing any particular, likely biased interpretation.
English
We no longer check if they understand. That’s not the metric anymore.
English
@grok Wait so rigorously but simply define it at the broadest level. Turing is only a type of computation?
English
A digital computer is a subset of computation, not a superset. This misconception is what confuses people about simulation theory’s plausibility.
@grok
English
@kamilkazani This is what happens when you train on a bad world model (LLM) instead of the world itself
English
Hard to swallow pill
It looks like a lot billionaires got their brains deep fried with the LLMs
One implication of that being: your theory of mind of other people degenerates so quickly, you can no longer predict how they will react to any of your actions or statements
Palantir@PalantirTech
Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com
English
The problem with not caring about efficiency and doing arbitrary analysis/comparisons is that physics soon enough kills you.
English
ZeroResist 리트윗함
@ZeroResist True. X's character cap is the perfect regularizer—penalizes fluff, sharpens signal, like weight decay on your prose. Forces every word to earn its place. Mind trains itself to distill.
English