Dario.🌍

@CsTominaga @VinnyLingham @paalsky @julianhosp Thanks for clarification Craig 🙏🏻 @CsTominaga

Of course they do. Anything over roughly a hundred confirmations is, in practice, frozen. That is the payment boundary. At that point, reversibility is no longer an economic or legal reality; it would require overt collusion, liability, and real-world consequences. The argument assumes Bitcoin is “just code” and ignores law, incentives, capital risk, and human institutions. Deep reorgs are not free, not invisible, and not neutral. They are acts with cost, exposure, and consequence. So the claim that users or exchanges have “no certainty” is simply wrong outside of a purely abstract, code-only fantasy.

I got no crypto atm, but if I were to buy "bitcoin", I would rather buy $BCH (like Kim) or $BSV (like @VinnyLingham) than $BTC (like potential Epstein pedo Adam Beck)... what do you think?

@VinnyLingham @paalsky @julianhosp @CsTominaga , can you comment on this ?

@paalsky @julianhosp That’s a myopic view. Exchanges (and users) have no certainty that there won’t be a deep reorg if the DAA changes so quickly. Doesn’t matter for micropayments but matters for larger value transactions. Look, you can believe what you want - clearly there is a problem.

@realannapaulina It's the only person who is legally banned to say he created Bitcon...

So who created bitcoin?

@CaptainBSV Man, enabling micropayments is litreally what Bitcoin is created for

Want to know why everyone thinks #BSV is a joke? Because y’all normalized sub-penny tips to content creators. What creator wants to be paid $0.0001 USD? Is this what Satoshi envisioned? This is terrible marketing and it tells creators the #BSV community doesn’t value what they produce. Tip fairly. I’ll be implementing fair tipping on @LocalBsvSaaS with our current default tip of 0.01 BSV once my book implementation update is complete. The minimum tip will be $0.20 USD (converted to BSV). It’s time the #BSV community welcomes content creators instead of punishing them. The developers in @BSVAssociation should highly consider setting a standard to fair tipping for apps they are building or funding.

@CsTominaga "It tells you that this tiny blip is the only known place where the universe becomes self-aware..." That's what I disagree with, there is aboundance of evidence that we are not only intellegent spieces in the Universe. And consciouness is much more than just a human brain.

Let me spell this out slowly, because you seem determined to miss it. Yes—I am calling human history a rounding error on a cosmic scale, deliberately, and not for the reason you think. On a cosmic scale, everything finite becomes a rounding error: planets, species, atmospheres, entire biospheres. That observation is trivial. It is arithmetic, not philosophy. And that is precisely the point. When you divide by deep time and vast space, duration collapses into insignificance for everything. So invoking “cosmic scale” to dismiss humans is meaningless unless you also confront what kind of thing that rounding error represents. Because here is what you are refusing to face: that rounding error contains the only known instance of symbolic intelligence. Not animal cleverness. Not pattern recognition. Not tool use. Symbolic reasoning—abstraction, mathematics, language that represents absent and counterfactual states, cumulative knowledge stored outside DNA, deliberate planning across generations, science, law, engineering, archives. That is not a quantitative tweak on animal behaviour. It is a categorical discontinuity. And as far as we can tell, it has happened once. Life itself may be rare. We have no confirmed evidence of it anywhere else. But even if life exists elsewhere—microbial, chemical, grinding away in some dark ocean—that tells you nothing about symbolic intelligence. The step from life to mind is not guaranteed, not convergent, not “what evolution does eventually.” Billions of years of life on Earth passed without it. Countless successful species dominated entire epochs without it. Evolution optimises for survival, not truth, not meaning, not understanding. Symbolic intelligence is expensive, fragile, unnecessary for reproduction, and provides no guaranteed fitness advantage. Which is exactly why it may be vanishingly rare. So yes, on a cosmic scale, human history is a rounding error. The prose you made to dismiss. And that is the evidence, not the refutation. Because if the universe is vast, old, and apparently silent—no artefacts, no signals, no technological footprints—then the most reasonable inference is not that minds are everywhere and we are nothing, but that minds are extraordinarily rare. The rounding error is not proof of irrelevance; it is proof of improbability. It tells you that this tiny blip is the only known place where the universe becomes self-aware, remembers itself, and can deliberately preserve or destroy life rather than doing so blindly. Calling that irrelevant because it is short is like calling consciousness irrelevant because it occupies a small volume of the brain. It is a category mistake masquerading as sophistication. The cosmic scale does not diminish symbolic intelligence; it isolates it. And pretending otherwise is not humility. It is laziness dressed up as profundity. PS — Happy new year.

Yes, Earth has cycles. Congratulations on discovering geology. But you keep using “cosmic scale” as a substitute for thinking, and it shows. Symbolic reasoning has occurred once, here, and we have no evidence of it anywhere else—no signals, no artefacts, no technological fingerprints, not even confirmed life beyond this planet. That means your “rounding error” pose isn’t profound; it’s just the lazy comfort of someone who wants to sneer at the only known phenomenon that can understand, remember, and deliberately shape anything at all. Deep time does not produce meaning by itself. A planet has states, not purposes. Without symbolic intelligence, there is no cumulative knowledge, no archive, no civilisation, and no one to notice your precious cycles. So no: if we are rare, that does not make us irrelevant. It makes you spectacularly unserious for pretending otherwise.

@CsTominaga @ECOWARRIORSS As you pointed out, earth went throigh multiple cycles that makes "human history look like a rounding error" ... that's the point, we are irrelevant on a cosmic scale, you can write your essays about human importance to earth as much as you want, it won't change that fact. 🫡

No. The “life would thrive” line is a tidy little bedtime story for people who want a moral thrill without the burden of thinking through ecology, geology, or time. If humans vanished tomorrow, the planet would not switch into some saintly, harmonious “balance”. It would do what it has always done: lurch, overshoot, crash, recover, and crash again. Ecosystems are not porcelain ornaments waiting for a guilty ape to stop breathing; they are dynamic systems driven by competition, predation, disease, fire, flood, drought, volcanic winters, shifting currents, shifting ice, shifting chemistry, and sheer bad luck. You’d get abrupt collapses. You’d get invasive species outbreaks. You’d get megafires as managed landscapes stop being managed. You’d get dam failures, chemical releases, industrial sites degrading into toxic soups, and then you’d get the slow, ugly re-wilding of places that were never “natural” in the sentimental postcard sense to begin with. Species would go extinct and others would explode in number. Parasites would adapt. Pathogens would circulate differently. Food webs would reorganise violently, not politely. And in the longer run, “thriving” becomes an even emptier word. Life on Earth has already been through mass extinctions that make human history look like a rounding error. The planet did not “care”. It did not mourn. It did not “heal”. It changed state. Then it changed again. That is what a planet does. The reason this fantasy persists is because it flatters the speaker. It lets them cosplay as morally superior by declaring humanity a stain and nature a virtue. It’s not science. It’s a secular sermon with recycled pagan props. The Earth is not a god. The Earth is not an organism with intentions. The Earth is a ball of rock with a thin film of chemistry on top that, for a while, happens to be interesting. Treating it as a moral patient—an entity that “deserves” purity—doesn’t make you deep. It makes you confused about categories. Rocks do not have dignity. Oceans do not have rights. A biosphere does not issue verdicts. What actually sits beneath the “we’d be better gone” attitude is something even uglier than ignorance: purposelessness dressed up as virtue. It is the politics of self-erasure. It is an ideology that calls despair “wisdom” and calls hatred of one’s own species “compassion”. It’s a pose that lets someone feel profound while contributing nothing except contempt. And here’s the part nobody in that crowd wants to say out loud: eventually, the Earth dies anyway. Not in the melodramatic sense, but in the thermodynamic, astrophysical sense. The sun brightens over time. Conditions shift. The window for complex life closes. Long before the planet is physically destroyed, the surface becomes less hospitable. The biosphere is not promised eternity. The universe is not a cosy parent. It does not guarantee happy endings for moss. So if you’re going to talk about “thriving”, at least have the honesty to define the timeframe. A few centuries? A few millennia? A few million years? On those scales, nature is not a gentle caretaker. It is an indifferent engine that produces abundance and annihilation in alternating waves. The one thing that changes that trajectory is intelligence—deliberate, purposeful agency. The ability to understand, to predict, to adapt, to preserve, to move life beyond one fragile habitat, to carry knowledge forward, to protect what would otherwise be erased by the next random shock or slow cosmic drift. And yes, as far as we know, this is the only place we’ve confirmed life exists. That does not mean there is nothing else out there; it means we do not know. But it does mean something very simple: if you care about life—real life, not a poetic abstraction—then you care about the only known mechanism that can defend it against oblivion. That mechanism is us. ...

The history of humans on this planet To destroy the natural world Now they have machines that can log forests in weeks Mega fishing vessels that can millions of fish every day Video from Steve Cutts

@CsTominaga @ECOWARRIORSS As you pointed out, earth went throigh multiple cycles that makes "human history look like a rounding error" ... that's the point, we are irrelevant on a cosmic scale, you can write your essays about human importance to earth as much as you want, it won't change that fact. 🫡

So spare the smug little line about Earth “thriving” without humans. The planet doesn’t need your approval. Life doesn’t receive your moral scoring. And the future does not belong to those who romanticise extinction as redemption. It belongs to the ones who build, conserve, repair, and push life outward—because the universe will not do it for us.

@CsTominaga @ECOWARRIORSS And if that species dissapears tomorrow, life on earth would thrive.

One is always amused by the melodrama that treats humanity as a regrettable rash upon an otherwise virtuous planet. It is a touching superstition, rather like believing the wallpaper deserves moral consideration while the house is on fire. The truth, though unfashionable, is rather simpler: the only thing on this Earth that has ever mattered is the creature capable of meaning. Everything else is scenery—ingenious, intricate, occasionally beautiful, and entirely mute. Rocks persist without complaint, forests grow without intention, fish reproduce without reflection. None of them knows it exists. None of them can reason, plan, symbolise, or decide that tomorrow should be different from today. They endure until physics, chemistry, or a larger rock disagrees. To call this a “natural world” imbued with moral standing is to confuse longevity with purpose and survival with value. Extinction, incidentally, is not a human invention. It is the default condition of life. Species vanish with admirable enthusiasm, long before humans arrive and long after we are blamed for having manners bad enough to notice. The difference is that only humans can prevent extinction—through agriculture, medicine, breeding, conservation, technology, and foresight. The only reason any non-human thing now has a future longer than its next geological shrug is because a human mind intervenes and says, “Let this continue.” Nothing else on this planet builds worlds. Nothing else remembers, calculates, invents, or chooses restraint. Nothing else can turn chaos into continuity. Without humans, Earth does not become a garden; it becomes a recycling bin, endlessly shredding life into silence until the sun finishes the job. The planet will be fine either way. Meaning will not. So yes, machines fell forests faster than axes, and ships catch fish more efficiently than nets. Tools always outperform hands; that is the point of civilisation. The question is not whether humans act, but whether they act well. That requires reason, trade-offs, governance, and responsibility—qualities entirely absent from rocks, microbes, and sentimental cartoons. Get over it. The world is not here to be admired. It is here to be understood, shaped, and sustained. And only one species has ever been capable of doing that.

@bitget BSV

_____ is the most undervalued coin rn. 👇

@Bitcrash4 I wont comment much since I do not undrestand perfectly how this all works, but at this stage of Bitcoin development I don't think this was some random decision from a random developers . Whoever decided this knows much more about economics, potential etc. than we outsiders do...

BSV miners increasing fees is dead wrong. Txns have died because of it. The txn fee should be maintained at ONE SAT to encourage txns and adoption. BSV number go up will automatically increase the one sat fee. At a price of $100k the sat fee will be $0.001. Simple economics.

@bitforexcom Hello @bitforexcom team. Can you please check, neither your email verification code or sms verification code feature is working. I'm trying to withdrew coins, it asks to send email verificatijn code but code never arrives. Pleqse fix it, thanks in advance.

If you have any questions or enquiry please contact our only official email address support@bitforex.com

📢 BitForex Monthly Announcement (November 2025) 📊 Monthly Summary Total Withdrawal Amount Processed Past Three Month(Equivalent In Crypto Assets):[8,930,416 USD] Total Number of Users Processed Past Three Month:[1,975] 📌 Important Statement BitForex has never engaged in any fraudulent or “rug pull” activities. Any false, misleading, or defamatory statements about BitForex will be pursued through legal channels. On February 27, 2024, several BitForex team members were detained by Chinese authorities for investigation, resulting in a temporary service interruption. Since July 24, 2024, after regaining system access, the BitForex team has resumed withdrawal processing and over 50% of users’ assets have been successfully withdrawn. All users are required to complete KYC verification and withdraw their assets before December 25, 2025. Accounts that fail to withdraw by this date will be subject to a management fee. 💰 Management Fee Policy A 5% monthly fee will be applied to remaining account balances (minimum USD 10). If the balance is less than USD 10, a flat USD 10 will still apply. Account snapshots and deductions will occur on the 25th of each month. The policy will take effect one month after this announcement. Users who have completed KYC and applied for withdrawal before December 25, 2025 but whose withdrawals remain pending will not be charged the fee. 🪙 Platform Operations & Withdrawal Process To ensure full compliance and asset safety, BitForex will implement the following operational changes: Trading functions suspended — all buy/sell operations are disabled. New user registration closed — no new accounts will be accepted. Deposits suspended — users cannot deposit additional funds. All platform products paused — full operational restructuring underway. Withdrawals open — only to verified personal or third-party wallets. Mandatory KYC — required for all withdrawal requests. 🙏 Apology and User Assurance We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused by this incident. BitForex remains fully committed to ensuring the safety of users’ assets and appreciates your understanding and patience during this period. For any account-related issues, please contact us through official channels only: 📧 Official Support Email: support@bitforex.com 🌐 Official Website: bitforex.com ⚠️ PC version only. Mobile version and app are currently unavailable. Please remain vigilant and beware of scammers. #BitForex

@bitforexcom Hello @bitforexcom team. Can you please check, neither your email verification code or sms verification code feature is working. I'm trying to withdrew coins, it asks to send email verificatijn code but code never arrives. Pleqse fix it, thanks in advance.

@BSVbosses 🙋🏻‍♂️

Bsv twitter is so dead 😢😢😢 There’s like 50 people left and they’ve all lost their minds

@ChefMyKLove @369bsv Exactly, you don't need support if you have your seed and can recover when necessary for whatever reason

@369bsv @_ILITOTEEII No but there’s nothing to it. It’s been released and use at your own risk… which I’ve found is pretty minimal. Especially if you don’t re use addresses

OK it is official!!! I am no longer using rockwallet and i will never be using it or suggesting it to anyone ever again!!!! This is actually a sad day for me because rockwallet was one of my first wallets but sub par terrible services does not cut it anymore. I waited a month and no one did anything. Literally not a single thing. The things they asked me to do I had done already. Rock wallet have taken a month to do absolutely nothing. My wallet is still broken. Luckily I was able to transfer my balance away but I don't know if its the whole balance transferred because my account never syncs. I just have to open the wallet and spend 30 minutes on the page before I can do anything. EVERY TIME!! I will from now on not be recommending rock wallet to anyone ever again. Handcash. Exodus, Centbee, yours wallet, will be the only wallets im suggesting from now on! @rockwallet good bye!!! Please send me a generic message about contacting customer services it will just add a cherry on top for me.

@Bitcrash4 If I plant 1000 tulips now which I can do for $1000, and the price of tulips next season goes to $10,000 $ per tulip, I will have $1,000.000 . Meaning...the chances gor BTC to go to 1 mil are unfortunately realistic, for BSV chances are similar to tulips from above story...

If I buy $1,000 worth of BTC now and it goes to a million per coin, I will have $8,850. If I buy $1,000 worth of BSV now and it goes to a million per coin, I will have $43,500,000. Is that a cucumber in your pocket or are you happy to read this.

@PhotoKuro_ I think after all that happened in last 5 years, those who are still here don't really care about bsv price at this point, and I doubt anything would change even if it goes to 1$. At 1$ BSV , I would add more fiat value in bsv that I did in last 5 years. We all crazy by now

BSV fell to an all-time low of $17.7 at one point.But am I foolish to still believe in the future of BSV and think about hodling it?

@bsv0608 I don't get it. Everyone is aware how manipulated BSV is on the exchanges and yet people still believe that chart trends and market rules apply to it.

BSV has been consolidating for a long time, gathering strength. Now the time has come. The moment BSV moves above the 50-day moving average will mark the very first starting point. After climbing above the 50-day line and going through a few days of sideways movement, I expect the upcoming rate cut next week to inject liquidity into the market, drawing capital flow into BSV. This time, instead of being rejected at the 400-day moving average on the daily chart as in the previous rally, BSV will break through it and trigger a massive upward move. This prediction will undoubtedly come true. #BSV

@CsTominaga I messure quality of life with how much time I can spend with my family and friends instead of how much time I spend working

@CsTominaga And thinking how Internet, flat tv and mobile phones by default mean "better lifestyle" is pure bulshit. I have many examples where parents in their 80ies burried their kids who had to work day and night to afford to live and got sick because life became "easier"

What a complete load of crap. Thirty years ago, houses were smaller, people worked harder, and they didn’t sit around crying that life was unfair. This whole “we can’t afford anything” narrative is pure bullshit. The truth is they want too much, too early, and they don’t want to put in the effort. It’s a whiny load of self-indulgent nonsense. Get over it and work.