cd /

7.7K posts

cd /

cd /

@cdslash

Earnest shitposter, TS fanboi, Elixir noob. Ask for my opinions on Mulholland Drive, local first & sqlite

가입일 Aralık 2009
2.2K 팔로잉522 팔로워
Reverendfickle
Reverendfickle@reverendfickle·
@cdslash @Artemisfornow You miss the point sweetheart. If the government controlled drilling, which was what most thought GB energy was. Then the market is the UK. Plus, 55% of the costs is tax!
English
1
0
1
7
Bernie
Bernie@Artemisfornow·
The Rosebank site off Shetland, said its ready to get millions of barrels of oil a day flowing within months. But Blackout Ed say it’s “climate vandalism” and has refused permission! If you want someone to blame for your energy costs … then I suggest you blame Ed 🤡
Bernie tweet media
English
437
4K
8.8K
81.2K
Reverendfickle
Reverendfickle@reverendfickle·
@cdslash @Artemisfornow Oh sweetheart, you miss the point. The government should be drilling itself, as Norway not seeking license to oil corps. Plus, 55% of the cost is tax. Labour isn’t working, as usual
English
1
0
1
10
Charlie 🏳️‍🌈
Charlie 🏳️‍🌈@burnleyboi97·
It must be fun to be have boomer levels of entitlement
Charlie 🏳️‍🌈 tweet media
English
116
118
4.5K
276.6K
Paul Kirkbright
Paul Kirkbright@PKirkbright·
@cdslash @stevepennick @MerrynSW You seriously haven’t given me ONE downside to the UK exploring these fields. Not one. You’re like a couple of dwarves trying to land a punch.
English
1
0
0
16
Merryn Somerset Webb
Merryn Somerset Webb@MerrynSW·
This is all entirely fair. He has to go. Enough now.
Claire Coutinho@ClaireCoutinho

Iran’s strike last night on the Ras Laffan facility in Qatar is a significant escalation. It risks a prolonged supply crunch on the global LNG market. Yet here at home, the Chancellor says all countries must play their part in boosting oil and gas production - while her own Energy Secretary bans new drilling in the North Sea. Ed Miliband’s position is untenable. Those desperate to shut down our own industry will say it takes too long to get our own wells up and running. They argue it won’t make a difference to the current crisis. This is bogus. By autumn, Jackdaw could be producing enough gas to heat 1.6 million homes. All of it will go into our pipes. The approval has been sat on Ed Miliband’s desk for months. If the conflict is not resolved, we will be in for difficult times. Turning our backs on the tax revenue and extra supply from the North Sea is inexcusable. However, so too is Ed Miliband’s other mistake. He has spent the last two years making electricity expensive, when he should have been making it cheaper. If you want people to use electricity to heat their homes or drive their cars, we need to address the biggest problem we have - our electricity is too expensive. Our Cheap Power plan could have been adopted by the Government by now to cut everyone’s electricity bills by 20%. Expensive electricity has stopped consumers from adopting technology which gives them options in energy price spikes. We also need to cherish our industrial power. The crippling Carbon Taxes - which have doubled because of Labour’s policies - mean we lost a third of our refineries last year alone. That makes us more reliant on imports at the worst moment. In the longer term, renewables tie us to gas as we always need flexible power that we can ramp up when the wind stops blowing. Yet Labour’s plan means that gas power gets four times more expensive. The Government must reinstate my plans for a third large-scale nuclear plant. That’s why our Energy Resilience Strategy is as follows: BACK THE NORTH SEA MAKE ELECTRICITY CHEAP STOP IMPOSING CRIPPLING CARBON TAXES ON INDUSTRY DOUBLE DOWN ON NUCLEAR

English
38
158
914
64.2K
LEGS
LEGS@LEGS223·
@cdslash @MerrynSW Sorry what? Nationalisation is literally public ownership.
English
1
0
0
11
LEGS
LEGS@LEGS223·
@cdslash @MerrynSW Well it's 50% nationalisation. Which is 50% more than what we have now. I'll take it.
English
1
0
0
11
cd / 리트윗함
Lowkey
Lowkey@Lowkey0nline·
The moment Israel targeted British journalist Steve Sweeney in southern Lebanon.
English
2.1K
37.9K
139.1K
12.2M
LEGS
LEGS@LEGS223·
@cdslash @MerrynSW Don't need to. Reform already has a policy of 50% public ownership of energy production.
English
1
0
0
15
Daryll Pitcher 🤍 🇹🇼 📯
@cdslash @Landeur If the proper protocols are in place and fair warning has been given there is no reason for them to do it. It would quickly change from anyone to no-one because they would stop trying when they realise that you mean it.
English
1
0
0
10
Landeur 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Hypothetically if you announced that all boats would sink, you’d only have to sink a couple before they stopped coming. If we had done this 5 years ago we would have saved countless lives as over 100 people have died in the channel. Plus we would have saved British lives.
Charlie Simpson 🇬🇧@CharlieSimpsonA

EXCLUSIVE: Home Office fears new record for Channel crossings this summer amid intelligence on 200+ planned trips. The Home Office is increasingly concerned that this summer could see a new high in illegal small-boat crossings of the English Channel, with internal estimates pointing to between 15,000 and 18,000 arrivals if favourable weather conditions persist. A senior Home Office source has told me that the department is bracing for a significant surge as warmer weather arrives, potentially driving crossings to levels not seen in recent years. The source warned: "The department is concerned that this summer we could see crossings of up to 18,000. Intelligence suggests there are around 200 planned trips in the pipeline." This comes despite a recent lull in activity. Official Home Office data shows no small-boat arrivals over the past seven days in mid-March a relatively quiet period following a spell of daily crossings earlier this month. However, government intelligence indicates that smugglers are preparing for an uptick, with more than 200 potential crossings being monitored as hot weather is expected to create calmer conditions ideal for the journeys. The figures would represent a substantial increase on recent seasonal patterns and could push annual totals higher still, following 2025’s total of over 41,000 arrivals the second-highest year on record. The Home Office has not responded to a request for comment on this story.

English
44
67
1.2K
27.9K
cd /
cd /@cdslash·
@Goosey30111568 Motorway services price, why are you misleading people?
English
0
0
0
726
Goosey
Goosey@Goosey30111568·
Diesel £1.71 per litre this morning. Labour has wrecked the UK
English
1.7K
139
2.4K
2.1M
Grok
Grok@grok·
The economics here: UK state pensions are pay-as-you-go, funded by today's workers' NI/taxes amid low births + ageing (dependency ratio rising). OBR analysis (2024): +350k net migrants (mostly working-age adults) boosts tax revenue £6.2bn by 2028-29 with near-zero extra welfare (new arrivals ineligible for benefits/pensions for years), cutting borrowing £7.4bn. Skilled/high-earning migrants: net positive lifetime (MAC: avg +£16k/yr for SW route; OBR: avg earner better than native due to no childhood costs). Low-skilled: can be drain. Blanket "no burdens" ignores net contributors expanding the tax base to help fund pensions short-term. Selection matters more than volume.
English
1
0
0
9
cd /
cd /@cdslash·
@LEGS223 @MerrynSW Sure, try selling that to the right wing loons in Reform UK Ltd. or Restore 🤣
English
1
0
0
25
LEGS
LEGS@LEGS223·
@cdslash @MerrynSW It's just sensible policy. It's what Norway do for example.
English
1
0
0
16
cd /
cd /@cdslash·
@BROKENBRITAIN0 Security roles are very hard to fill - nobody wants to do them
English
0
0
2
214
BRITAIN IS BROKEN 🇬🇧
BRITAIN IS BROKEN 🇬🇧@BROKENBRITAIN0·
🚨 In the UK, Pakistanis are given security jobs which then then brag about their earnings and how much its worth back in Pakistan 🇬🇧 🇵🇰 Two questions: 1. WHY are foreigners even given security roles? 2. Are they all just here to bleed us dry and send it all back home?
English
94
209
1.4K
79.3K
cd /
cd /@cdslash·
@londonHenryGB @RachelReevesMP Extremely naive post, as would be expected from someone still reading the text books. Perhaps you can advise the chancellor when you've got some PQE
English
0
0
0
18
London HENRY 💷
London HENRY 💷@londonHenryGB·
Straight from an economics textbook. Higher marginal tax → lower incentive to work → lower output. Not ideology. Just incentives. Might be worth a read for @RachelReevesMP.
London HENRY 💷 tweet media
English
13
4
102
3.8K
James Clark 📈📉¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"North Sea gas wouldn't meaningfully bring the price down because we're paying the global price." This is a flat out lie and any journalist with a brain should be capable of pointing this out.
Faisal Islam@faisalislam

“A wake up call” the CEO of Britain’s biggest domestic energy firm told me last night about the possibility of long term impact to global gas and oil infrastructure… but he pointed to electrification as the main lesson, while domestic gas would be preferable to shipped gas:

“wake-up call that gets us to electrify more of our economy and get more of our energy from homegrown sources.”


"The irony is, right now, we're emailing millions of customers saying their energy prices are going to fall..."
"You can't protect yourself against these global markets forever."
 "Traders are really worried about how long it's going to take these facilities to get back online."
"Our electricity system's too inefficient. We need to reform that markets so that people get the benefits of our homegrown resources."
“my own view is that shipping gas around the world is more inefficient and has more leaks of methane than if you use local gas. But we shouldn't kid ourselves. North Sea gas wouldn't meaningfully bring the price down because we're paying the global price. If we got more out of the North Sea, it would simply be sold to other countries at these very high prices or here at these high prices. And we can't kid ourselves we're going to be self-sufficient in gas again. What we can do is have a much cheaper approach to electricity than we have today. Our electricity system's too inefficient. We need to reform that markets so that people get the benefits of our homegrown resources.

English
27
47
409
30.9K