danu
367 posts


LOOOL XRP SOL ADA
It's so over for crypto
But it's so on for my bags
Tree News@TreeNewsFeed
[🌲] President Trump: Executive Order on Digital Assets directed the Presidential Working Group to move forward on a Crypto Strategic Reserve that includes XRP, SOL, and ADA: Truth Post
English
danu 리트윗함

Western Civilization invents artificial means to prevent impregnation. From that day onward, people are shocked that birth rates decline. Women control reproduction and grow up in a society that tells them men are bad, being a mom is shameful/unambitious, society incentivizes divorce w/ financial incentives, alimony, child support... marriage has become too much of a financial contract. With ~60% of marriage failing is it a wonder why people don't want to start families?
English


Successful trading is pretty boring. Been flat for 9 days and not by choice
the market is offering me nothing and refuse to force anything
Trizzy@ImTrizzy
The amount of money I’ve rinsed not being patient for my levels and blindly bidding in the middle of nowhere during slow grinding chop down is prob enough to buy a new family home
English

@follis_ @Trader_8422 „Liquidity removed“ = sold their bags
„Liquidity migrated“ = got early allocation deals?
🐟
English

@Trader_8422 No mate, that was the V1 token. Liquidity has since been removed from that contract and migrated to V2 🤝
dextools.io/app/en/ether/p…
English

I’d like to be the first to officially announce the bottom is in!
DonAlt is fudding mother lmaoooooo
we are UP in holders….
- yes -
this is what onboarding looks like!!
when you have 3 huge whales jeet + a hell of a lot of normies and new holders onboard with smaller wallets your chart looks like this. 🫶🤷♀️
A chart primed to pump as we’ve seen many others do in past cycles.
Thankyou for the pussy lick Don…
When you hate WE KNOW that tokens gonna pump 🫶🐨🍑😇
DonAlt@DonAlt
Wasn't this the celebrity coin that was heralded as THE ONE? This isn't onboarding new people It's offboarding existing ones
English

Don't let arbitrary entry precision stop you from putting on good positions.
It always comes down to context.
Practical example: $BTC when it reclaimed $32k.
That was a very strong signal, but if you waited for a perfect retest, you didn't get it.
The weekly candle closed at $34.5k - roughly 6% above the perfect retest level.
The next level of resistance (weekly range midpoint) was around $46k - roughly 33% higher.
Question: Is the extra 6% precision in entry worth missing a 33% move if you don't get it?
Alternatively: Is the expected value of buying $34.5k versus $32k significantly worse in this context?
In this example, I'd posit the answer is 'no'.
There is always a tradeoff if you try to be precise in your entry.
The main benefit is that better entries usually lead to better trade management, better R:R (whatever that's worth), and trading closer to your invalidation (very valuable).
The main detriment is that if you're too granular with your entry criteria, you risk missing big moves for a marginally better entry (i.e. no good reason).
Sometimes being precise is worth it, especially if you're dealing with lower time frames, small moves, and medium strength signals that occur relatively frequently.
Other times being precise is very costly, especially if you end up FUDing yourself out of excellent high time frame moves just because you didn't get the perfect wick entry 0.5% higher/lower than you planned.
One way to get around this is to split your signals up when you're dealing with low frequency, high time frame, high signal setups (i.e. the good stuff).
Entry 1: Systematic Entry. The priority here is just putting on a position. Sometimes that means market buying a strong weekly/daily close and having it retrace shortly after. But that's irrelevant - the main focus is acting on the high signal setup. You have to turn off your low time frame trader brain for this. As soon as the signal is generated - you act. This entry tends to be more conservative in sizing given the wider parameters.
Entry 2: Trader Entry. This is where you are a lot stricter with your entry criteria and emphasise precision. The goal is to get a better entry, more actively managed, with greater proximity to invalidation. This entry tends to be more aggressive in sizing given narrower parameters and more active management.
If you get a systematic entry but don't get a trader entry, you still have a position and acted on a strong signal.
If you get both, great - your average is likely better, you likely fully filled your risk allocation for that setup, and your trade management will likely be better too as you can manage the trader entry more actively without compromising the core setup (let's be real - how many times have we taken a high time frame swing, managed it on low time frames, made a bit of money, but missed making a lot of money on the setup due to impatience?)
Most importantly - you've acted on the setup in either case.
Getting good entries is great.
Missing great trades because you didn't get a perfect entry is wasteful.
Low frequency, high time frame, high signal setup = priority shifts to putting on the trade. A better entry is a luxury.
Medium-high frequency, low-medium time frame, medium signal setup = priority shifts to a better entry. A good entry is a prerequisite.
Prioritising correctly based on the setup, market conditions, and context is the real skill.
English

@donalt @CryptoCred "Neid ist die höchste Form der Anerkennung"
i do hope you also read the positive ones!
Deutsch

@CryptoCred I don't even have twitter premium rn so I'm not gonna get paid for this engagement either
can't believe I have to read these dumb ass replies to my tweets for free
English










