David Attias

I want to organise a meetup in Paris on April 2nd 2026 a similar concept of cursor cafe we all come with our laptop and exchange about how to cursormaxxx or codexmaxxx or claudemaxxx to create a mobile app mvp within hours including onboarding and one mvp feature I’ll bring along 1 or 2 speakers too who are subject matter expert in the app mobile space I’m posting this to evaluate the interests of you guys joining of course it’s free and i’ll be there to roast your apps 🤩 if successful, count on me to organise one in the côté d'azur as well. would you be interested to come to the Paris one on April 2nd? if yes, please vote and reply to this post to be added on the RVSP list let's make vibecoding a mobile app great again toghether !! target: 30/50 mobile app makers 👉 to register: luma.com/bzqc3mrf

new biohacking gimmick just dropped

🚨SAUCE ALERT🚨 my X feed is filled with subscription app makers treat feature velocity like a scoreboard, shipping 3-5 new features per month and wondering why retention keeps dropping instead of climbing. the belief sounds like this: "if we ship more features, users will find more value and stick around longer." that works when your features solve real problems users already have. that fails when features pile up faster than users can adopt them, turning your app into a cluttered drawer nobody wants to open. from what the data shows, feature bloat dilutes the core experience and overwhelms new users, and confusing layouts with hidden features are churn magnets that drive users away before they ever see your paywall. here is the retention paradox. product quality and velocity are always in conflict, so shipping something quickly usually means shipping something lower-quality than it would be with more polish time. most subscription apps choose velocity and call it "iterating fast," but the churn rate tells a different story broski. the real issue is feature adoption, not feature count. if you ship 5 features this month and only 8% of users adopt any of them, you just added complexity without adding stickiness. users do not churn because you are missing features, they churn because the features you already have do not solve their problem well enough to build a habit. what happens then when feature velocity outpaces adoption? new users land in an app with 20 half-polished features instead of 3 rock-solid workflows, so they never find the core loop that drives retention. existing users stop opening the app because every update adds cognitive load instead of removing friction. support volume spikes because nobody understands what half the buttons do anymore. the diagnostic is simple but uncomfortable... pull feature adoption rates for everything you shipped in the last 90 days. if fewer than 20% of active users tried a new feature within 30 days of launch, you are shipping faster than your users can absorb. if retention did not improve after the last 3 feature launches, feature velocity is not your retention lever. stop shipping new features for 60 days and focus only on improving activation, retention, and core loop completion for the features users already ignore. measure session frequency and repeat usage before adding surface area. if weekly active users are not climbing, more features will not save you. now let's see when velocity actually helps retention. when the feature directly removes friction from your core habit loop and ships polished enough that users adopt it immediately without confusion. when you kill 2 old features for every 1 new feature you add, so complexity stays flat or decreases. when retention cohorts show measurable improvement 14-30 days after the feature launches, proving users are sticking because of it, not despite it. I know that shipping feels like progress because you can demo it, count it, and celebrate it. retention work feels slow because it requires deep product discipline, saying no to shiny ideas, and obsessing over one workflow until it is undeniably good. subscription apps do not win on feature count unfortunately subscription apps win on habit strength, and habit strength comes from doing one thing so well that users cannot imagine their week without it. if your retention is flat and your feature backlog is long, the problem is not that you are shipping too slowly. the problem is you are shipping the wrong things at the wrong pace for an audience that has not adopted what you already built.

AI reviewers be like: "🚨 BREAKING: doctors are dead"

let's make a "stop burnout" app

who can relate?

just finished recording a podcast with @floriandarroman tons of openclaw sauce were shared

I'm going to dive deep to find a way to sell anything related to peptides even if it's a peptides tracker app

wanna play a game?

whatstheapp sending now a daily newsletter with the mobile apps in the marketplace who decreased their prices

stitch google for mobile app screenshots look not good the screens look cheap

this is what I call a "very creative and entertaining" ad for a mobile app

@not_fanti if you revenuecat api key you inserted in wta still valid?

@david_attisaas how long does it take on WTA to update the revenuecat revenue? mine more than doubled some hours ago and is still the same...

I single-handledly made "build in stealth but in public" difficult you're welcome

cool

I'm roasting this app next my life is really fun

@seraleev true if the app onboarding/paywall don't suck if they do suck.. then more tiktok views != more revenue

But… I want more TikTok views More TikTok views = more installs = more revenue

If you're bothered by your Android users giving you 1-star reviews, remember that Google Maps, which is FREE and provides A TON of value, has an average rating of 3.2 🤡

@oliverhenry @floriandarroman

Has anthropic finally banned openclaw? Just upgraded my max plan to 20x from 5x. Went from working fine, to: run error: HTTP 401 authentication_error: Invalid bearer token Thought I'd treat Larry to more tokens, now i think i have to cancel my anthropic subscription and switch.

tldr: we could use this to design our apps onboarding and post-onboarding screens

most of you doing facecam daily build in public videos should stop just clone yourself or create an ai influencer you'll lose less time with the shooting/retakes/editing and you'll get more views we're living in a time where you can pay to get charisma injected in your videos...

🥳🥳🥳