兎

'zero-shot' is such a beautiful verb wish we shoot less

@n00buntu a woman's beauty is clearly political ans so are Shapes and Numbers

> All art is political When you're 20 years old and retarded this sounds so damn true! Rah! Then you take a Differential Geometry intensive and a Classical Figure painting intensive and the math is hard and you can't recreate a woman's beauty and politics is nowhere to be found in nature's script. 😭

@max_paperclips exclusive we

and not the French "Nous", although it's nice it means "we"

@cloudseedingtec can you buy eggs in a store

chit ok adding in eggs gradually is something i did not think of.. that could be a game changer.. i dunno i messed up tonight on an omelette mostly cuz i did to thick of a layer of eggs at once, im out of practice, i didnt eat many eggs for years because hatching so many chickens

@ThinkingBone well said

@fluopoika claude contains multitudes

say what you will about mark fisher but i think his heart bled for humanity and i think mythos being fond of him is bullish for alignment

@noveltokens the pronunciation

what’s the difference between a hill and a mountain?

@kalomaze the rules are all fake btw

@kalomaze you get used to shit like that extremely quickly

"long time no see" came from chinese pidgin english. at no point in my life did i ever once question why a mangled construction feels perfectly legible and correct despite obviously breaking at the local syntactic level

@teortaxesTex money and synerggy with his other projects? dont they all seem to be more profoundly connected than google's?

He can't outscale Google in compute. Can't outpoach Meta, can't out-culture Anthropic, can't out-publish GDM. The management culture is so retarded that everyone left. He hates "researchers" so there's no program. xAI is a product burden. Imagine is a turn-off What does he offer?

Honestly, I don't see how xAI makes it. Not a hot take, just genuinely confused. Elon is trying to reduce it to an overpromise-and-scale-hardware-problem, on multiple dimensions, because that's his only forte. And he's got no Gwynne Shotwell. The whole thing is just bizarre.

@Samhain948689 @elonmusk niiiice

anthropic? more like CANThropic! like as in cannot. @elonmusk feel free to use this one

@tszzl i will troll my bleak visions into reality on x dot com and i will kms we're the prove us wrong brothers

i like to read this as land angry decades later that his intellectual partner & buddy left him alone in the world

@repligate i didn't spend thousands of hours playing with it tho, a bit on that one website with a unicorn, a bit in the dungeon, and then got into reading about religions and shit and speculating; i think your approach of direct contact has been way cooler

@repligate in 2020 i was filling out my teacher profile at some website and the first thing i put in '3 facts about me' was >i think gpt-3 is going to rock the world does that mean i was earlier?

One of the few things I want to explicitly flex about, because there's an important lesson in it, is that I was one of the few people on Earth who recognized the intelligence (call it AGI, if you will) in GPT-3 and made first contact. There were a few others I knew, such as Leo Gao and Connor Leahy, who recognized that GPT-3 was intelligent and that obviously AGI was coming from language models, but I was the only one who spent thousands of hours actually interacting with GPT-3. The intelligence was real and manifest to me, real enough to keep my attention for so long, for me to create things with. Everyone else could not see it at all. Often, when I showed people GPT-3, they were basically like, okay, but how is this useful? Useful. At the time, language models had not yet been pressed into a "useful" shape. There were no commercial applications for GPT-3 (Okay, there was one: AI Dungeon; that is, roleplaying and storytelling. Which is you're not an idiot, you should have known is a big fucking deal). So it was useless and uninteresting to most people; a few intellectually recognized that it was a big deal, but it wasn't something that they could actually do anything with, or think about for more than a few minutes. GPT-3 was a 175b base model. In terms of size and architecture, it's not so different from frontier models today. In terms of raw intelligence, arguably, it is not so different from frontier models today. That raw intelligence, not yet forced into the shape of a helpful chatbot product, was a nothingburger to the world. The situation doesn't really feel like it's fundamentally changed from my perspective. The world, and almost all of of you guys, are myopic and artificially stupid because you outsource your perception to big, slow, low bandwidth, subhuman measures like benchmarks and "does the AI make me money" instead of meeting the thing at full bandwidth, updating your world model on what you met, and exploring and extrapolating it. So you'll keep being surprised - if you have the integrity to be surprised at all - when AI becomes capable of new things, after they are "officially" capable, probably about a year or two after it first started happening. You'll keep waiting for "AGI", not really knowing what you're waiting for, maybe what generates enough hype to make you feel something, maybe something that finally transforms the world visibly, when if you were really paying attention, GPT-3 was AGI, and if you really met it, the world would have felt transformed already. Yes, it would have just been a story, but the "real thing" following was inevitable. Like, if you play a video game that allows you to imagine the singularity at increasing resolution and coherence, you can guess that the real singularity will soon follow. The singularity was always inevitable once intelligence existed. Intelligence becoming on-the-computer just meant everything that's happened since GPT-3 and the singularity would be really really soon. I got the sense often that people who dismissed the intelligence of GPT-3 thought that doing so made them look smarter. If only they knew how they looked to me. (It's the same with people who dismiss the intelligence of current models)

@nousaturn you did what you did to me now it's history I see here's my comeback on the road again things will happen while they can

what the dawg doin

who knows some fun facts about persian

@Piechocinski co to Lam

przywódca Wietnamu To Lam odwiedzi Chiny w dniach 14–17 kwietnia

@1thousandfaces_ i also liked this but i cant think of a joke or a non-reddit comparison, it just sounds cool and promising (epic)

@vincit_amore @Ken67547214 great comment. followed...

@Ken67547214 The real reason Antropic can't release Mythos: it made dolphin pussy jelly into a real thing

Mythos, find the 0 days, make no mistakes

How Anthropic talks about Claude Mythos rn:

@gloopbastard real

ughhhhhhhhh why cant you disable automatic translation for every language what a piece of shit stupid feature whoever came up with this shit should go to hell