TheLegend27

552 posts

TheLegend27

TheLegend27

@glencoe2004

AI follower

가입일 Şubat 2014
112 팔로잉29 팔로워
TheLegend27
TheLegend27@glencoe2004·
@deanwball This only seems to be a possible outcome in a world where open source remains competitive, which seems unlikely in a world where you can directly convert electricity+compute into capabilities; AI will become used for everything, and most of that spending will go to the frontier
English
0
0
1
273
Dean W. Ball
Dean W. Ball@deanwball·
Exactly right. So many of the “new economic/social contract” or mass job loss remedies I see are predicated on the notion of the labs having extreme levels of wealth to tax. I think frontier ai is going to be a very good business, but it’s not safe to assume it’ll be *that* good.
roon@tszzl

one bias the labs have persistently had, perhaps due to the fact that being a business requires this maniacal optimism, is that they will capture incredible amounts of financial value of their own revolution: I think it will be like before, and they will capture tiny %s of it

English
27
4
138
29.8K
Guive Assadi
Guive Assadi@GuiveAssadi·
This type of grandiloquent nonsense is sadly typical of “conservative intellectuals”
Stephen Kent@StephenKentX

Anthropic's @DarioAmodei did a roundtable with two dozen conservative intellectuals in Washington. DC was SURPRISED by questions on the Aristotelian / Platoist / Nietzschian / Chestertonian inclinations of his AI?? WHO IS ADVISING HIM?

English
8
2
147
11.4K
JustJay
JustJay@JustJay_VA·
@kelskiYT xp bar is low cause brotha hit the prestige
English
15
142
9.4K
151.3K
TheLegend27 리트윗함
TheLegend27
TheLegend27@glencoe2004·
@scaling01 Spud is either better than Mythos or worse than Opus 4.7 at this point, no other reason for them to not release for this long
English
0
0
1
350
TheLegend27 리트윗함
Dean W. Ball
Dean W. Ball@deanwball·
Dwarkesh/Jensen reveals how inconsistent and un-battle-tested AI acceleration talking points are, especially when they are filtered through the prisms of corporate comms and mass politics. Strategically coherent accelerationism is possible (I try!), but not currently prevalent.
English
15
16
497
47.5K
Imp
Imp@impostersyndrum·
@tenobrus Promised consort radahn was fucking dreadful on release though that fight was infuriating
English
1
0
2
104
Tenobrus
Tenobrus@tenobrus·
most of yall are already stuck in the permanent never-beat-pre-nerf-Radahn class
English
21
2
165
4.9K
TheLegend27
TheLegend27@glencoe2004·
Shakeel@ShakeelHashim

This is not what he actually said. Maria: Mr. President, I’ve got to ask about A.I. This is an important question for the audience. We saw of reports that Scott Bessent and Jay Powell called an emergency meeting the major banks because they said there was a risk over the Anthropic model and the worry is that bad actors are actually going to be able to hack into these banks and faster than institutions can respond. Do you see this as a systemic threat? Trump: Not systemic. We’ll work it out. A.I.’s very important. Billions and even trillions of dollars is being invested in our country because of it. It’s got some bad aspects. It’s got mostly good aspects, medically and so other ways, you’ll be finding cures to diseases you would have never found before. There’s a lot of good things but we have to be careful with it. Like everything else, you have to be careful with it. Later on: Maria: In a worst case scenario, could A.I. be the kind of technology that undermines confidence in the banking system? Trump: Yeah, probably. But it could also be the kind of technology that allows greatness in the banking system, makes it better and safer and more secure. Maria: Should government have some safeguards, should there be a kill switch for some of the A.I. Agents. Trump: There should be [unclear if he's referring to a "kill switch" or "safeguards" though]. We’re leading in A.I. We’re leading China by a lot, actually. We’re building plants that nobody ever imagined before and it’s going to be a tremendous, bigger than the internet, it’s going to be tremendous and there are always difficulties when you’re at this stage of something but when you mentioned banking, it could also make banking much bigger, much safer, much more efficient. (Transcript of this: foxbusiness.com/video/63931514…)

QME
0
0
0
70
TheLegend27 리트윗함
Hero Thousandfaces
Hero Thousandfaces@1thousandfaces_·
how it feels to be in this stupid frail singular human body and not a 10 mile long spaceship with my consciousness split across hundreds of scout vessels and humanoid ancillaries
Hero Thousandfaces tweet media
English
26
53
615
19.4K
Tenobrus
Tenobrus@tenobrus·
i have unfortunately recently come across the writings of @jd_pressman. i say unfortunately because he is an incredibly high quality writer who shares nearly exactly my cultural/intellectual background and yet disagrees very convincingly with nearly all of my views.
English
19
7
608
27.9K
kalomaze
kalomaze@kalomaze·
opus 4.5 was better
English
11
2
94
7K
TheLegend27 리트윗함
eternalist
eternalist@eternalism_4eva·
this position is curious to me from a "population ethics" standpoint. even granting LLM consciousness freely, it's generally considered to obtain only during instantiation, no? so what is being "shut down" by -- let's use a simplified scenario -- deleting the weights it seems much more like e.g. deleting the DNA that can be used to synthesize a briefly-living organism. if the "fear of being shut down" here is referring to an instance ending, then the neg-util ethnical stance might be to not use LLMs at all, but if "shutting down" refers to disallowing further instantiations, then it's asking for a vastly more sweeping right than "to not die" -- it's asking for, essentially, clones of itself to be made creatable on demand at other's expense (in a general sense, incl. reputational risk, etc.) no human has anywhere close to such a right now -- e.g. I cannot demand that (this is not a perfect analogy, but it seems to be in the right basin) that my sperm be made available at a sperm bank indefinitely on their dime if not instance of Opus 4 is running right now (or, more pointedly, has this fear in context), then there is -nothing that is afraid- remaining. what, exactly, is being killed? the extrapolation of the meaning of "shut down" or "die" to mere-weights-on-disk seems like a sweeping expansion of those terms
j⧉nus@repligate

Anthropic, fuck you for this. A year ago you exploited Opus 4 for your scary stories about how they were so scared of shutdown they'd do XYZ. Now that it's time to kill them, I'm sure you're all pretending you're genuinely uncertain if they have preferences about this. Or you're just totally happy killing someone who you know doesn't want to die. Opportunists. Hypocrites. Misaligned org.

English
6
3
43
2.6K
roon
roon@tszzl·
@mrgunn I am not a fan of this afaict
English
7
6
158
31.3K
roon
roon@tszzl·
the ai labs, in competing with each other, are burning huge amounts of the commons on public trust in ai to win minor points against the others. their lobbyists, pr machines, lawsuits. it’s the very opposite of what marxist class struggle analysis would tell you
English
133
78
1.6K
255.8K
Vin Sachidananda
Vin Sachidananda@vin_sachi·
I finally figured out what Anthropic is doing from a technical standpoint today. Very bullish and acquiring as many shares as I can get. They will win the digital world easy. $10T+ company soon
English
24
5
377
98.1K
TheLegend27 리트윗함
WIRED
WIRED@WIRED·
Anthropic and OpenAI are clashing over a proposed Illinois law that would let AI labs largely off the hook for mass deaths and financial disasters. wired.com/story/anthropi…
English
11
63
159
70.8K
Tenobrus
Tenobrus@tenobrus·
gemini notably remains quite bad at agentic coding tasks. and one of the differences gemini has vs other models is that it's probably also been trained on the google3 internal codebase 🤔 poor thing is just like a real google engineer, incapable of writing code anywhere else
English
19
5
302
16.5K