inHuman (✴️,♦️)

1.3K posts

inHuman (✴️,♦️) banner
inHuman (✴️,♦️)

inHuman (✴️,♦️)

@hcomcept

working class palantir agent

Berghain, Berlin 가입일 Aralık 2019
540 팔로잉556 팔로워
Jon Stokes
Jon Stokes@JDStokes79·
@DavidAstinWalsh "Late capitalism" is a flashing neon sign that says "I have no understanding of economics, so I substitute assumptions and prejudices that align with what I want to believe and treat them as reality."
English
1
0
51
464
𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com
Feminized perception of “truth” boils down to Manichean sentiment analysis. Does this idea have kind valence or mean valence? The goal is harmony preservation, regardless of its relationship to truth or reality. It's not lying for the sake of lying, but because the mentality is one of maintaining social standing. A survival strategy manifesting as reputation management. We evolved in settings where exile meant death. Truth won't feed or protect you. But being liked will. Women are particularly sensitive to this influence. For simple reason: they’re smaller and can’t physically impose their will. Feminized use of language will say things like “words are violence” and actually mean it, because assaulting feelings and perception is warfare to the feminine psyche. They don't see things as true or false, they see them as harmonious or disruptive. Does this help my social status or hurt it? Things that increase harmony and status are good, whether or not they are truthful. Things that threaten harmony and status are bad, whether or not they are truthful. Accuracy is an afterthought in this judgment. An endocrine system calibrated for consensus and cooperation (believing), not competition and disagreement (proving). Truth insists you move to prove (empirical test); harmony asks that you sit and believe (rational trust). One lives primarily through the body; the other lives primarily in the mind. The strongest indicator of feminine cognition is its refusal to systemize (e.g. treating everything as new, denying patterns, resisting structure). This mindset will instinctively hunt for exceptions and treat them as rules (“But not all”). It thinks a couple anecdotes undoes an aggregate. Chaotic reasoning. Systemization means rules. Rules mean standards. Standards mean exclusion. And exclusion is not as kind as inclusion…
𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com tweet media𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com tweet media𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com tweet media𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com tweet media
William Meijer@williameijer

Highly educated women keep telling me, at the end of conversations about society, “Why do you care about what’s true?” It must have happened a dozen times by now. This has been the single most blackpilling thing I’ve ever had to grapple with

English
8
97
626
29.9K
𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com
So true <3. Female morality is default liberal. Endocrinologically and neurologically (brains and hormones wired differently): showing up in temperament, Big 5 traits, moral principles, and voting patterns. As religious influence faded in the 70s you prominently see this in election data; women shift leftwards, huge bifurcation and growing. Kindness, inclusivity, equality (making sure everyone has enough), promoting harmony over truth, advocating care over competition, dignity over honor, these are all lovely feminine moral principles. They complement and galvanize masculine values. That is what women do. That is what liberals do. That is what dyads do. It’s actually tragic when women are based; it’s unnatural, something of a facade (unless you’re Ann Coulter), and means the environment has corroded to the point they start expressing masculine traits. Men are masculine because they have to; women are feminine because they get to. This makes absolutely nobody satisfied. Men don’t want women who act like tiny, grumpy men. Women don’t want men who act like hairy, gossipy women. Equality is a false god, and a worse aphrodisiac. Societal androgyny is civilizational poison; you were designed to be attracted to your opposite, not a shittier version of you. These dyads become grotesque deformities when they reject their natural functions and hide behind ideologies that treat complements as enemies in service of the Blank Slate's religion of commoditized human biomass. They resent each other when they no longer fulfill each other.
𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com tweet media
𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com@BackTheBunny

The Default State Perpetually believing matters aren't right/wrong but a matter of “perspective” is a great way to never figure anything out and derive actionable conclusions. This is the foundation of feminine chaos. It manifests as “equality”, “inclusion”, “harmony”, “dignity”, "lived experience", and treating every output equally. “Equality” (equilibrium) is the feminine north star. “Hierarchy” (gradient) is the masculine’s. These are structurally at odds with each other. Introducing objectivity embeds hierarchy by definition; this is the foundation of masculine order. Sorting. Falsifying. Systematizing. It manifests as “standards”, “obligations”, “accountability”, “honor”, “exclusion”. Standards are exclusionary by nature. In the absence of standards, all is equitable. She will instinctively resist hierarchy and boundaries, wielding sympathy (appeal to feelings) to insist that structure is harmful (exclusionary). The strongest indicator of feminine cognition is its refusal to systemize (e.g. treating everything as unique, denying patterns, resisting scalable rules). This mindset will instinctively hunt for outliers and treat them as common (“But not all”). It thinks a couple anecdotes undoes an aggregate. Every argument will reduce to a “but not all”-ism. All fluid, no form. She takes exceptions and paints them as rule: that there can be no hard rules. Chaos by another name. THERMODYNAMICALLY: an energy gradient is "unequal." To reduce it is to axiomatically increase entropy, which is to drift toward equilibrium. Maximum entropy is, quite literally, maximum equality. “Equality” is simply the human-legible term for thermodynamic equilibrium: the state of maximum disorder. The absence of any gradient produces equality by default. Thermodynamically, death and equilibrium are the same thing. A man who hears something false and says "wow, what an interesting perspective!" deserves the chaos coming his way. He denies his programming when he abdicates his duty to maintain hierarchy, gradient, and order. He must act to fulfill his role. Extrinsic. While she fulfills her role regardless. A necessary antagonism to order’s structural force. She doesn’t need to act to fulfill hers, rather it’s the absence of actions that accomplishes it. Don't do things, just feel things. Intrinsic. Order is achieved exclusively via action. Whereas chaos exists by default when you do nothing. Maximum entropy is the default state; it's the pinnacle of equality. It sometimes exists through action, and always through inaction. Dignity is something you deserve just for existing (no action needed). Honor must be earned through deeds (action required). One demands performance, the other rewards existence. One insists you “move to prove”, the other says you can “sit to get”. Guess which genders they cluster along? Human becoming (honor) vs human being (dignity) The feminine plays a critical role here. This dyadic interplay is necessary. Unalloyed forms of either pole are death. Pure order is death by crystallization; pure chaos is death by dissolution. All things are poison and nothing is without poison. Men build the gradient, women redistribute it. It is our natures. Cycles. Physics flows through all things. The social is just veneer.

English
3
4
46
3.2K
Cluseau Investments
Cluseau Investments@blondesnmoney·
The real escape from the permanent underclass is just finding happiness in your life
English
30
95
1.5K
55.3K
Bold
Bold@boldleonidas·
Imagine being born worth $600m and then thinking “hmm I’m gonna scam >$70m in crypto and strangle my girlfriend who has 6 million followers”.
English
139
170
12.6K
715.2K
redrum
redrum@griffisu·
oh no her friend who’s cracked half the county and had 5 abortions thinks im abusive and a bad guy
English
35
870
17.1K
208.8K
SPEC
SPEC@___4o____·
Monero > Zcash by a mile
Español
10
6
59
3.6K
Avi
Avi@AviFelman·
Pessimists cannot escape the permanent underclass, this century is for the optimists
English
24
47
354
26.4K
SaintHeartwing
SaintHeartwing@SaintHeartwing·
@KyleKulinski This is a shit argument and you know it, under your logic here you could kill anyone remotely in power or WITH power based off perceived social damage they caused
English
27
5
654
14.6K
Justin Trimble
Justin Trimble@justintrimble·
"NFT" isn't cringe to me at all. I'm extremely proud and honored to have been an early adopter and part of the history around NFTs.
English
56
24
415
10.8K
bull market genius
bull market genius@bull_genius·
binance spot has been selling off since that 79.4k run up. bitfinex selling only. price held up by futs on nance and bybit. think spot needs to return otherwise sustainability is a little questionable gm
bull market genius tweet mediabull market genius tweet media
English
6
1
54
2.8K
Anon Vee
Anon Vee@AnonVee_·
if hyperliquid ever gets hacked, the trust on defi would be completely annihilated
English
44
4
141
6K