Crypto Miner

@JeffKirdeikis Ok I believe you. Can you take this simple challenge ? x.com/i/status/20094…

Claude saved me $350,000 and 20 months of time

GoMining is the only investment in the crypto world that hasn’t failed me. (Based on my personal experience)

@sab_maya_hai__ They will run out of business soon.

This company of 200 employees seems to be firing 80% people. Small IT companies will lead the firing. They are lot more agile than the biggies. My friends company is firing 50% employees in next 6 months.

@SumitM_X Think of NULL as Unknown. SQL is a 3 valued logic. True, False, Null. So Null = Null will return Null. Imagine you have 2 boxes that you don't know what is inside them. When you are asked box1 = box2 ,the answer "I don't know". But when asked is box1 unknown you will say yes.

SELECT * FROM users WHERE salary = NULL; SELECT * FROM users WHERE salary IS NULL; Are both these queries same?

@mkurman88 If there is a way to use any model you want it will be better. For example if you can use your Claude subscription (or any subscription) in antigravity it would be nice.

Antigravity lost its moat; unfortunately, it's time to switch.

@d4m1n x.com/i/status/20094…

in principle, anyone can build everything with Opus 4.5 you only need to do marketing

I challenge Vibe Coders 👇 Since AI is replacing developers, I challenge non-developers to build an app using any AI they want. 🎯 Task: Build an Android app that mines KASPA ✅ Publish the full source code on GitHub. No screenshots. No “trust me bro.” Remember: non-developers

Don’t worry, AI is not taking away our jobs anytime soon. 😭

@yacineMTB Even when you add strict instructions file, many times it will ignore it. I think this is because it is biased towards the training data. This is an issue in all LLM. That is why you should review the task once it is done to make sure it follows what you want.

claude opus 4.5 is a laughably bad programmer. like comically bad. every single thing that i haven't explicitly asked for that it does is in extremely bad taste

@SledgeDev Including some of my posts 😄

@SledgeDev I feel like there is one person who has created millions of accounts on x. All posts have the same writing style 😎

What if we all agree to just stop using ai

@bindureddy You have to think of it as junior developer that works for you. You describe the architecture, technical details and rules it should follow, the let it develop the system for you, step by step. And before going to next step you have to review and approve the work.

AI is an excellent coder, but a poor software engineer It struggles to understand complex code bases, debug hard bugs and or do robust testing Instead it hallucinates and gaslights you that it has aced everything 😂

@jwatte @bindureddy I used Opus 4.5 for a month on a project. When the code base became large it struggled to understand the code that it generated 2 weeks ago. You have to correct it, and then you get the famous response: "Sorry, you are right, let's update..."

@bindureddy That was the state of the world six months ago. Two things have improved since then: - Opus 4.5 is better than all the other models. - Augment context engine helps understand large code bases. It's still not perfect, but it's absolutely passed the "positive value" point!

@hunvreus It’s the same as asking AI to write a scientific paper about a topic you don’t understand. It looks solid to you — until a professor reads it and instantly spots the mistakes. Then AI replies: “Sorry, my mistake…”

Either I’m a moron, or people bragging about one-shotting hyper polished apps are full of sh*t. I still spend a lot of time on UI/UX, security, optimization, documentation… With AI, I get to try more things, more quickly, but it’s still a slow process.

@hunvreus Bad AI code looks impressive to non-developers. To experienced developers, it feels exactly like those useless AI answers you’ve already seen in other topics.

@jkaartinen @Grummz But for non-developers, it’s risky. If you don’t understand what the code is really doing, you can’t judge performance, scalability, or long-term impact. “It works” is false confidence.

@ios_developer84 @Grummz That's the key to using it. Make sure it knows how it should write the code. Make sure all the important project knowledge/principles is either in the CLAUDE.md file or in separate files indexed from there. Claude can do most of that work as well, if you ask it

Claude opus 4 .5 has been around for months, it hasn’t changed. But in the past 2 weeks, rafts of coders, some very experienced, are suddenly claiming that coding is solved. Is this a form of AI psychosis? Where the belief that Opus 4.5 is a miracle coder is being reinforced, not just by the AI, but by numerous social media confirmations by other coders who may also be falling into AI psychosis? To me, that this recent tend is erupting so suddenly, when we’ve had Opus 4.5 for months, is interesting and potentially a red flag. As for my own experiments with 4.5 and other models, AI in coding can be very amazing and useful, but I still have to be the architect, and it still blows up and fails a lot. Psychosis can be induced by multiple people each confirming each others beliefs. This is how tribal bubbles work, and how hype gets generated by marketing and social trends. It’s worth noting that and thinking through it.

@jkaartinen @Grummz My point is, it is great for developers who actually know the technology. If you understand the language, framework, database, and production behavior, AI becomes a huge accelerator — saving time without lowering quality.

AI is a multiplier. If your foundation is solid, it multiplies productivity. If your foundation is weak, it multiplies chaos.

Eventually: The codebase becomes inconsistent Performance regressions are unpredictable Refactoring becomes risky No one fully understands the system — not even the AI At that point, “AI-assisted development” turns into AI-assisted technical debt.

There’s a lot of hype right now around “anyone can build software with AI.” In reality, AI can absolutely help — but only if you already understand what you’re building. Otherwise, you may be shipping problems you don’t even see.