Phil Smith

@cryptopunk7213 What happens if another window pops up while’s it’s working?

well thats fucking it - anthropic has officially replaced software engineers. claude is now a 24 hr autonomous coding agent. claude can now operate your entire computer and CLAUDE CODE = end-to-end software engineering: - claude writes the code for you - then literally opens the app it coded - clicks through the entire app and find bugs - then fixes the bugs and improves the app in hours. previously claude generated code, you run it and give claude feedback. thats completely gone now. all in a continuous loop without leaving your terminal 😂 we're barely through monday. well done lol

@kylegawley Keep it coming. Love the hot takes.

I have zero concern about people vibe-coding alternatives to my products because I know how hard it is to build a software business anyone who thinks they can copy a business with Claude is a moron and morons don't succeed

@kylegawley We’re living through one of the greatest smoke and mirrors shows in human history. Most people are full of shit, lying, or legitimately have no idea what they’re talking about. I’ve shared my thoughts here: linkedin.com/pulse/great-ai…

why is everyone lying about how good AI is?

@softr_io The casual platform updates over the past year have been amazing… the fact that whatever this is, is worth a hype post says a lot. Can’t wait!

"We're all losing our minds over here. It is SO GOOD!!" When a launch doesn't need hype... the reactions sound like this. 👆 See you 03/31.

90% OF THE AI AGENTS ON YOUR FEED ARE A LIE. They aren't running businesses. They aren't transforming workflows. They are glorified screen recordings of a sandbox held together by hope and a single API key. We are currently witnessing one of the greatest smoke and mirror shows in human history. If you are "vibe coding" an app with no database and no hosting, you aren't a founder. You are a tourist in a technical graveyard. The party is over. It is time to build something real. In today's edition of Marketing Beyond the Tactics, I am pulling back the curtain: -- THE VIBE CODING TRAP: Why it is a fatal dead end for your business. -- THE CONTEXT HACK: Why you need to stop typing and start dictating. -- THE REAL WINNERS: How to build Super Agents using ClickUp and Softr. Stop selling the vision. Start building the foundation. 🔗 READ THE FULL STRATEGY HERE: linkedin.com/pulse/great-ai…

@mattshumer_ Where is Opus 4.6 Extended in this table? Would that not be the comparable model? Seems GPT-5.4, even "thinking," barely edges Opus 4.6 out.

I've been testing GPT-5.4 for the last week. In short, it is the best model in the world, by far. It's so good that it's the first model that makes the “which model should I use?” conversation feel almost over. The biggest surprise: I barely use Pro anymore! If you know me, you know I'm a Pro addict. I reach for Pro models constantly, and use them for almost everything, as they just... nail almost anything I give to them. For the first time, 5.4's standard version, with heavy thinking, just broke that habit. Even in standard mode, GPT-5.4 is better than previous models in Pro mode... crazy! Coding capabilities are ridiculous... it's essentially flawless. Inside Codex, it's insanely reliable. Coding is essentially solved. There's not much more to say on this, it's just THAT good. The Pro version is near-perfect. Other testers I spoke with saw it solving problems that were unsolvable by any other model. At this point, Pro is overkill for almost every normal use-case, but when you really need the power to do something extremely difficult, it's incredible. Consistent with everything I've said above, even the standard thinking version uses fewer reasoning tokens than previous models to get the same level of results. In practice, this means you get great results much faster than before. This was one of my biggest gripes with previous OpenAI models. They just took too long to complete simple tasks. Assuming the speed we had during testing holds up as more users join, this is going to be a big win for OpenAI. It still has weaknesses, though: - Frontend taste is FAR behind Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro. , why is this so hard to fix? @OpenAI once you fix this, there's literally no reason for me to use any other model. Please please please do it! - It can still miss obvious real-world context. For example, I had it plan an itinerary for a trip. At first glance, it looked perfect, but it failed to take into account that it chose locations that would be mobbed by spring breakers, so I had to re-run the prompt from scratch with more context. - When testing it inside OpenClaw, it kept stopping short before finishing tasks. I'm assuming this will be fixed quickly, but it's still worth noting. But zooming out: This thing is so far ahead overall that the nitpicks are starting to feel beside the point. GPT-5.4 is a serious fucking model. The best model in the world. By far.

I should add a bit more context to that. When I say it’s bullshit, I don’t mean the tech isn’t mind blowing or incredibly capable. What I mean to say is that much of won’t solve problems or be scalable on the way that consumers think it will be, in respect to how it’s all being marketed and sold to them.

@productive_will It’s really amazing what you can do with AI and agents inside of @clickup. Most of what’s being peddled out there in terms of AI and agents is total bullshit. ClickUp is implementing it in a way that instantly useful and scalable within your business.

You can use ClickUp automations to auto assign tasks to your AI super agents. I've got this pipeline in ClickUp that's auto-generated every Monday by one of my super agents. Once I've qualified a lead and changed the status, I don't want to start typing an outreach email from scratch. So I built another super agent, the "Personalised Outreach Agent", that writes the draft email in my tone. The set up is a dead simple automation: When status changes to Qualified → Assign the outreach agent (and keep me on it too, so I can oversee). That's it. I drag the task across (or just click the status), come back later, and there's a draft sitting in the task comments or saved straight to my Gmail drafts. No more staring at blank screens on a Monday. Quick demo video here if you want to see it in action 👇

@wendellfp Because he had Joe Flacco.

Mike McCarthy is so underrated. Why is John Harbaugh considered a better head coach than him?

@NFL_Talk_Sports The truly mind-blowing fact here, is that he did half of that with the Jets... who also went 12 of 17 games without a real head coach.

QB Aaron Rodgers over the last two seasons: 64.2% 7,219 passing yards 56 TDs 18 INTs If Rodgers wants to play, he has proved he still can.

@KBeckEagles Built a probability tree breaking this down. The math shows keeping timeouts = 33.73% win probability vs using timeout = 16.65%. All the outcomes mapped here: claude.ai/public/artifac…

4th-and-8. Season on the line. HAVE TO HAVE IT. And this is what Nick Sirianni and Kevin Patullo draw-up off a timeout... There was nobody open. Jalen Hurts never had a chance. It’s incredible how Patullo survived the entire season. Malpractice.

@ScrappyStew12 @Eagles Built a probability tree breaking this down. The math shows keeping timeouts = 33.73% win probability vs using timeout = 16.65%. All the outcomes mapped here: claude.ai/public/artifac…

Can anyone out there tell me why @Eagles called that timeout on 4th down from a tactical standpoint? Take the delay of game or run the play, that third timeout would at least allow you to get the ball back. That timeout was worth wayyyyyy more than the 5 yards.

@audavidb Built a probability tree breaking this down. The math shows keeping timeouts = 33.73% win probability vs using timeout = 16.65%. All the outcomes mapped here: claude.ai/public/artifac…

Coaching is hard. I’d be a terrible coach, but this is the playoffs and today only Bills at the 1 can kneel and have 3 tush pushes to win game and instead just give jags ball down 3 Eagles call timeout giving them one play instead of an extra possession Chargers don’t run it on 2nd to make sure sure they free roll a score to end the half This part isn’t hard. Amazing the dumb shit they do that’s so obvious.

@KTSmithFFSN Built a probability tree breaking this down. The math shows keeping timeouts = 33.73% win probability vs using timeout = 16.65%. All the outcomes mapped here: claude.ai/public/artifac…

@inside_the_dome Built a probability tree breaking this down. The math shows keeping timeouts = 33.73% win probability vs using timeout = 16.65%. All the outcomes mapped here: claude.ai/public/artifac…

Nick Sirianni calling a timeout was idiotic for the Eagles, essentially ended the game since they needed all three timeouts. Him also benching starters against the Commanders was a huge mistake Wouldn’t say he should be fired, but that’s bad

@Alex__Monaco Built a probability tree breaking this down. The math shows keeping timeouts = 33.73% win probability vs using timeout = 16.65%. All the outcomes mapped here: claude.ai/public/artifac…

Sirianni calls a timeout with all 3 left and literally costs his team the game Way to read the room #Eagles #Niners

Built a decision tree analyzing the Eagles' timeout call on 4th & 11. Interesting to see all the possible outcome paths visualized side-by-side. claude.ai/public/artifac…

@YouTubeTV Canceled.

We know how disruptive it is to lose channels you enjoy, and we’re committed to continuing to work with Disney to reach an agreement. If their content is unavailable for an extended period of time, we'll offer our members a $20 credit. For updates, visit yt.be/disney.

Members, when we renew our contracts with network partners, we advocate for fair pricing to offer you the best TV experience. Our contract with Disney has reached its renewal date, and we'll not agree to terms that disadvantage our members while benefiting Disney’s TV products.

@fbgchase You might have to throw some INTs to win some games…

Justin Fields has gone 9 straight starts without throwing an interception.

@NYJetsTFMedia Pocket passers who can process quickly and execute consistently have thrived in every era of the NFL. Offenses built mostly on QB legs or gimmicks tend to be hot-and-cold, but quick decision-making and rhythm passing have always sustained success.

Justin Fields on how he feels average time to throw is not a "credible" stat: #Jets "I don't really look at stats if I'm being honest with you. I'm not on social media. My job is to put as many points up on the board, whether that's the least amount of time to throw or that's the most. I feel like that's not a good indicator cause you've got guys that scramble & then they count that, so pocket passers will have the least time to throw because they scramble the least. I remember one of my years in Chicago they said I had the longest time to throw too, but at the same time I'm scrambling behind the line of scrimmage, so of course they're gonna count that, so I don't think that's a credible stat for the QB position if I'm being honest with you."