jay

@MattDaWhite It's so bad that it almost feels like a disinformation campaign

As I said yesterday, full retard.

@chrisramsay52 @BrianJa24362347 @LuigiVenditelli Lol

🚨 ZOOM IN! 🚨 This image taken by Scott Mitchell (enhanced by Brian Jackson @BrianJa24362347 ) featured in the recent documentary about Bob Lazar by @LuigiVenditelli , shows a pretty significant delineation of what appears to be 9 hangar doors in the side of the Papoose Mountain range (1st door is bigger) exactly where Bob said they would be and exactly as Bob has described them many times before. Those lines are not interpretive, they are objectively showing signs of manmade shapes which are at the EXACT spot he said they would be. Yet one more thing on a long list of things that Bob has “predicted”.

@traviebird00 Agreed I'm good with Love, Tate, Elite D, or trade back.

You can tell me Tate isn’t good value at 4 and I’ll listen to it but if you start saying he’s Corey Davis you’ve lost me. Tate is probably a top 15 pick any given year. He would immediately be WR1 here. I say this to say, it’s going to be really hard for the Titans to disappoint me at 4. They’ve managed to do it before but they’d really have to screw this thing up.

@Shenandoah96026 @Josu72676294522 @charise_lee @itsdeaann Your entire life is a pathetic lie.

@Josu72676294522 @charise_lee @itsdeaann The gun was taken away about a second earlier, and it's entirely probably that he had no idea it was taken from him. If you reach for where you think your weapon is, that shows intent to use the weapon, whether it's still there or not.

My blood is boiling 🥵 don’t know how @itsdeaann keeps it together listening to this‼️

@Bugimus Nope

I Couldn’t See Them Either—Until I Knew What to Look For I just watched S4: The Bob Lazar Story, directed by Luigi Vendittelli, and it left me feeling compelled to explain why this enhanced aerial photo actually makes sense to me. Many people are quick to dismiss or even mock this photograph, joking that it “proves” nothing and ridiculing the idea of hidden hangar doors built into the side of a desert mountain. I’ll admit, when I first looked at the original image, I couldn’t see anything either. I was subconsciously searching for conventional, free-standing hangars like you’d see at any airport or military base—large boxy structures sitting out in the open. Nothing like that appears. Once I understood what to look for—camouflaged, slanted rectangular doors designed to blend seamlessly into the sandy hillside—the rectangular patterns became much easier to make out. Where the natural terrain should show smooth, irregular contours of rock and desert, distinct straight edges and uniform rectangular shapes stand out instead, especially after modest adjustments to contrast and levels. This is a publicly available aerial photo, taken from roughly 17 miles away over the Papoose Lake area. In its enhanced form, it appears to reveal a series of these slanted doors (with the first one noticeably wider, consistent with descriptions of a larger main hangar). Nearby, faint vehicle tracks and what looks like a road can also be seen leading toward the hillside—further hinting at human activity in a place that should otherwise be barren. The image does not prove the existence of flying saucers or alien technology. It doesn’t even constitute “drop-dead” proof of a secret facility. However, it is strong circumstantial evidence supporting the physical layout Bob Lazar described for S4 back in 1989: a hidden installation built into the Papoose Mountain hillside overlooking Papoose Lake, featuring camouflaged hangar doors sloped to match the terrain and coated to evade satellite and visual detection. Lazar’s specific details about the location and the nature of these doors—deliberately low-visibility and integrated into the mountain—align remarkably well with what emerges in the processed photo. Skeptics are right to point out that image enhancement can sometimes create artifacts, but the consistent rectangular geometry where none should exist, combined with the access road/tracks, makes this more than just pareidolia for many observers. It remains one of the more intriguing pieces of publicly available visual context in the long-running S4 discussion—interesting precisely because it matches key elements of the story without relying on Lazar’s word alone.

@polarityjosh No you're just getting more retarded

Is CGI getting worse?

@KaceyMusgraves He tied the fishing line and said be right back. Haven't seen him since.

Did your dad ever tie your loose tooth to a fishing line and a remote control car or were y’all normal?

@TrashDiscourse Might have something to do with your pedo cult leader blowing up the middle east with no plan but blame Biden forever. Fucking morons.

Just filled my truck up today at Costco for $128 Thanks a lot Joe Biden ⛽️🖕🖕

I think it boils down to the fact that you're just too fucking boring to get it. Enjoy your pea salad this weekend.

@AmericanaFan1 @AlaskaBird__ @realmikolson @YouTube Hello liar

@AlaskaBird__ @realmikolson @YouTube Theo von is a trust fund nepo baby. All you gotta do is a quick google search to figure that out. None of these people’s followings are organic. And I say that as someone who used to listen to Theo a couple years ago.

I’m going to need someone to explain why Theo Von, the serial reality TV star, is an authority on geopolitics but Erika Kirk is a fame-chasing gold digger. Like I’m 5. Thanks. 👍 youtu.be/ydkX_iN_rho?si… via @YouTube

@DDouche2 @AlaskaBird__ @YouTube Thank you D Douche for living up to your namesake

Coke head losers follow their own (Theo Von disciples). Erika Kirk has handled herself angelically with grace decency and dignity in the face of the horrendous murder of her husband. Losers hate that because they know deep down they could never be that good of a human being. They resent her.

@TootyTracksuit @AlaskaBird__ @YouTube Hahahaha none of this is true but very cool story

@AlaskaBird__ @YouTube You ladies are just too fucking boring to get it. Enjoy your pea salad this weekend.

@KristaMonroe @AlaskaBird__ @YouTube You guys are way too fucking boring to be the target audience for Theo. What's on the menu for Easter, ladies? Making that pea salad again?

@AlaskaBird__ @YouTube I didn't even notice the link.. lol 🤦‍♀️ But that definitely clears it up for me, thank you.

@MTVenture @emkenobi What does FSD have to do with love of space. He's spent billions of his own money on SpaceX. There are 101 things to criticize Elon for but "love of space" is not one of them.

@jay_nfl @emkenobi way off? like elon's delivery of Tesla FSD or SpaceX to Mars?

Because his "love for space" was a giant lie, and you all fell for it.

@UAPFilesPodcast I understand that. I mostly believe Bob. This picture ain't it. I'll check out the movie. Thanks.

@jay_nfl He was literally in the phone book, Jay.

Not a joke, but also out of context. In context, one more piece of evidence connecting the probability that Lazar had access and strongly implies he had been there, or worked there in some capacity. I held back initially out of respect for the filmmaker and for those encountering this material fresh. Luigi isn’t careless or naive. He was one of the youngest members of Canadian MUFON, later a regional director I believe. He interviewed Ariel school UFO witnesses and formed a close friendship with one witness who he dedicated the film to. He’s literally out there pounding the pavement and has been for decades longer than most. He’s not some grifter declaring every minor thing is a bombshell or hyping for clicks. After speaking with him over the past three years, I trust both his diligence and his instincts. The key points as I see them: First, the timing of the satellite imagery. The exact month and year Lazar went public in his interview with George Knapp, a new filtering process was introduced to commercially available aerial imagery (this being pre–Google Earth). That filter removed visible detail from this remote location described by Lazar. Why? Lazar described vehicles pulling up there dropping him off. In the earlier imagery shown by Luigi, you can clearly see vehicle tracks leading directly to the location Lazar described…what he referred to as the “hanger base.” Multiple tracks, in fact, extending out into an otherwise empty landscape, far removed from the main Area 51 facilities. Those tracks are absent in the later, filtered imagery introduced precisely when Lazar came forward. Why? Viewed properly, on a high-resolution display, the geometry of the structure embedded in the terrain is far more defined than the compressed screenshots circulating online suggest. I watched on my 65inch 4K TV and I can see the shape in the hill. It is there. Why? The implication here is not nothing. Imagery appears to have been altered at the exact moment public attention was drawn to that location because of Lazar. Not months later, not years later. That same month. And if we could confirm exactly, I bet it’s within days of Lazar doing that interview. Why? Second, corroboration of Lazar’s presence. George Knapp has stated that the contractor who facilitated Lazar’s employment confirmed he worked there. So we now have to say Lazar got lucky and Knapp, an award winning (non UFO) investigative journalist at the time lied and risked his entire reputation for some random story. Why? Official narrative is he’s a “fantasist”, he had nothing to do with the place and made up his education. Yet, Lazar appears in the Los Alamos National Laboratory phone directory. Why? He was featured in a local newspaper as a “physicist” working at the lab and showing off his homemade jet car….no correction, no retraction. Why? These are not trivial details. They establish that Lazar was, at minimum, embedded in environments he was later said to have fabricated entirely. Third, operational knowledge. Lazar described the method of transport (aircraft followed by bus) The existence and location of S4, long before any formal acknowledgment. The handling and properties of Element 115 prior to its recognition. Individually, each point can be debated. Together, they form a pattern that is ridiculous to conclude is just him being lucky. Fourth, consistency of witness testimony. Multiple individuals, over roughly four decades, have consistently stated that Lazar brought them out to observe test flights, at specific times, where they witnessed UFOs near the location he said he worked behaving in ways that defied conventional flight characteristics. Not vaguely. Not retrospectively. Repeatedly, and on cue. Time and day he said it’d happen. They corroborate him even now. It also matches a theme those days, “the hippies who saved science” Project Stargate/ MKUltra. “Mad scientists” who think outside the box were routinely used by the IC.

@chiweethedog Tbf, Theo's positions have been ever evolving in a positive direction

@nazzobetweeting Of course not

are the republicans going to ask “where are we getting that money from” for this the same way they do when we talk about feeding kids in elementary schools or providing daycare for working families or providing healthcare for americans ?