

Bugs Finds Bigfoot 👣🪶
58.3K posts

@Bugimus
Follow me for Bigfoot stories & UFO discussions 👣🛸 – sharing sightings & theories! Proud Native American 🪶 Stoic devoted to Jesus Christ 💜🙏💜








🚨 Bigfoot Body Found! 👣 NY Post & News Nation Say Yes—But Here’s Why It’s a Clear Hoax 😐 Fellow Bigfoot enthusiasts and truth-seekers—you’ve likely seen the recent NY Post and News Nation stories claiming “Snake the Bigfoot Hunter” recovered a full 8-foot Sasquatch body he calls “Dack” in the Adirondacks, complete with DNA allegedly proving a 58.5% Neanderthal / 41.5% human hybrid. For those newer to the topic, the headlines can feel like a long-awaited breakthrough. But this is a textbook hoax, and it’s worth breaking down clearly so the patterns are easy to spot next time. The coverage often repeats the sensational claims (Cornell DNA testing, hybrid results) with minimal scrutiny. That’s why many of you have reached out asking if it’s legitimate. Let’s cut through the hype with straightforward questions and context. Key red flags that reveal the hoax: • The “body” has already been paraded at local fairs (last year’s NY State Fair drew thousands of visitors; another run is planned). Real scientific evidence doesn’t premiere as paid exhibition fodder. • Logistics strain credulity: Transporting and preserving a 300 lb decomposing corpse from remote woods? No detailed chain of custody or credible explanation of how it was accomplished. • No support from prominent researchers. The community hungers for verifiable proof—yet established voices like Matthew Moneymaker dismissed it as fraud early. Genuine evidence would draw serious investigators, not silence or rejection. • DNA assertions without substance: No public report, raw data, peer review, or independent confirmation. Cornell has not validated the story. • Timing and motive: Claims ramp up right before fair season and book promotion—classic grift pattern. • Production quality on earlier videos from Snake is notably poor and unconvincing. This isn’t an isolated incident. It recycles a familiar playbook. Rick Dyer’s 2012 “Hank” hoax—a toured “body” later admitted as a latex/foam/camel hair prop—shows striking facial and stylistic similarities to “Dack.” Tom Biscardi has a documented history of comparable hyped discoveries that never produced real science. These cycles rely on big announcements, ticketed exhibits, merch, and books while delivering zero transparent evidence. Many dedicated Bigfoot researchers feel legitimate frustration. Their careful field work and analysis get overshadowed, reinforcing the “all a joke” stigma that mainstream science and media love to apply. It hinders progress for everyone serious about the mystery. Personally, I don’t let hoaxers offend or deter me. I’ve learned not to tie my efforts to what others think or say. My path isn’t about proving Bigfoot to the world or winning arguments with skeptics. It’s about deepening understanding through honest research and sharing reliable insights with like-minded friends and researchers. That focus keeps the work freeing and productive no matter the noise. Tired of the smoke and hype with these claims? I keep it honest, down-to-earth, and evidence-based here—real analysis and respectful discussion for those who actually want to know more about Bigfoot. 👣🪶 The Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Sabe question deserves rigorous curiosity, not recycled carnival tactics. When sensational stories drop, ask: Where’s the full data? Who independently verifies? What’s the actual motive behind the timing and promotion? What red flags jump out to you in this coverage? Have you spotted similar patterns in past claims? Share your observations respectfully below—let’s foster better conversations and critical thinking today. #Bigfoot #Sasquatch #CriticalThinking #TruthSeeking








Re conspiracy theories already surfacing that Lindsey Graham was murdered by Russians, here is SuperGrok's latest info on his cause of death. "Aortic dissection due to arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease" not a poison-tipped dart, plutonium trace, etc. x.com/i/grok/share/f…





👽 Did Grusch See Footage of Live Aliens? 👽 "Grusch has seen evidence that will leave you slack-jawed when you hear it." ~JF 😶 What Left Congress Speechless, and Staffers with Their Eyes Popping Out of Their Heads? 😱 ~ "Examine biological evidence of living or deceased non-human intelligence." ~Burlison Proposed Legislation (I'm gonna break all of this down and give you my speculation on what left Fox with his jaw on the floor, members of Congress speechless, and their senior staffers with their eyes popping out of their heads.) ~ @jamescfox: " Probably about two weeks ago (late May), we were having meetings on The Hill with members of Congress. We brought in a PR firm, 42 West, and we were having a meeting with staff members, bipartisan. We had @RepLuna, @RepTimBurchett, @RepEricBurlison. We had a representative from @RepMoskowitz's office. We had a number of Chiefs of Staff (top staffer for a specific member of Congress), like, present." (Don't really know why they needed a public relations firm in attendance, but if it helps them with advice on how to handle this, so be it. Just know: it appears like members of that PR firm know what Grusch said, and we don't.) Fox: "And, I can't reveal what was said. I thought it was gonna be said at the actual event that we had yesterday (June 9th) in DC with Mr. Grusch." (Don't be mad at Fox for keeping his word to Grusch and not sharing what was said in that private meeting. But I don't blame people for being annoyed that Grusch shared this information six or so weeks ago and we still don't know what he said in that room.) Fox: "Then, what Mr. Grusch revealed to all of us, what he had seen with his own eyes, left the room speechless. It drew the oxygen out of the room. I looked at everybody in that room, and their eyeballs were popping out. My jaw was on the floor. Like, I simply couldn't believe what he'd seen with his own eyes. Like, I can't wait for it to come out. "So I asked Mr. Grusch today, 'Can I talk about what I heard?' And he's like, 'No, but I will be addressing it very soon.'" (Like I said, it's almost been one month now (June 12) since Fox said this, so what does "very soon" mean? Was Grusch supposed to share this information on CNN with Jake Tapper last week but it didn't happen because that interview was, reportedly (Fox told us), postponed?) Fox: "So that's where we stand right now. But I can tell you, Mr. Grusch has seen evidence that will leave you slack-jawed when you hear it. It's coming, it's coming." (We heard that Gruch's Op/Ed was coming soon and that was 2.5 years ago. It never happened. So, I don't blame people for being skeptical about this. If Grusch hasn't told us by this time next week, I propose someone (a member of Congress) who was in that room just tell us. That's fair, right? Total transparency from our elected representatives?) ~ Fox: "Mr. Grusch is legitimately concerned about his personal safety. He's coming out with it, I promise you, this is coming out. He assured me today that he will address this issue to the general public very soon, in the near future." (I'm glad Grusch told a room full of people what he saw, as that may offer him some protection from people who allegedly want him to stop talking.) Fox: "So I can't speak to what he's gonna say, but I'm just telling you from what I heard out of his mouth, sitting in an office of a member of Congress? And everybody (Fox laughs) in the room, you could have heard a pin drop." @ClaytonMorris: "Could you give us a hint? Is it related to craft? Can you maybe dance around it a little bit? I want to say, 'You're killing me, Smalls (laughs).'" Fox: "Yeah, so if you can imagine, if you know about 'Moment of Contact,' that involves captured non-human intelligent beings. Think about that for a minute. Think about that case. I heard it out of his mouth, and I can tell you, I was in the room. And I looked around the room, and I'm looking at these young, like, guys in their 20s, you know, the staff guys? And their eyeballs were popping out of their head. My jaw was on the floor. I couldn't believe it." (There's a reason why I included that quote (living or deceased non-human intelligence) from the new Burlison/Carson/Crane legislation at the top of this tweet: At the very least, I'm confident Grusch told them that he saw photos of dead non-human beings. Bodies. But what about evidence of LIVING non-humans, aka aliens of unknown origin? More on that at the end. Fox: "My jaw was on the floor. I couldn't believe it." (Would Grusch saying he saw photos of craft and dead non-humans have that type of effect on Fox? Seems like that's something he would have expected to hear.) ~ Fox: "It was an [out of] body experience when I heard that. But I can tell you...the impression I got, was that he felt a little more protected to talk about this because of President Trump's directive to release the files, and that this... Again, this is my speculation, okay? This is not what Mr. Grusch said. "I got the impression that he was much more relaxed - even though he was still not fully relaxed - because of President Trump's directive to release these files. And that it was something that he had seen during his official investigations just within the last few years." (Imagine how much more relaxed Grusch (and others) would feel if we had an actual Executive Order from Trump with strong language to protect whistleblowers?) Fox: "And that it...I think it had an extremely profound impact on his life when he saw this evidence that he described. Again I'm leaving it right there. I've been talking with Republicans, and they said if @joerogan tweets about this, that the President will hear it, And I can't overstate the significance of that." (Why hasn't Rogan already done that? No excuse. Fox has been on Rogan and I'm sure he has Joe's contact information. Make it happen.) Fox: "We need people. We're not asking for money, we're not asking to get on your show, we're just asking, Mr. President, please, as many people as possible, release the files that should not be associated with national security. And that's the alien or non-human sentient beings. That's it." ~~~ (I'm going to speculate on what Grusch may have said in that room.) Fox: "I think it had an extremely profound impact on [Grusch's] life when he saw this evidence that he described." (Grusch has said he started out as a skeptic when he started looking into this. If he was shown what he felt were photos of non-human bodies, I think that might be enough to have an, "extremely profound impact on his life." Depending on exactly what those photos showed, of course.) In "Moment of Contact," Eric Davis had this exchange with Fox: @jamescfox: "Put me wherever you were when you got to see photographs of crash retrieval and documents. What did that feel like?" Dr. Eric Davis: "That was startling, when I actually see recorded evidence with my own eyes. Photographs, reports, and whatnot. That took it to a higher level, that kicked it up several notches of reality. And that made it very clear that this reality is very hard, very physical, very real. "And this type of evidence, you can't come by in the open literature, it's not public, it's classified. And I can't discuss what it was, but I can tell you, yeah, it's a crash retrieval, there's a craft, and there's alien bodies. That's all I can say about it." Fox: "You swear on your life that you saw those pictures?" Davis: "Oh, I swear on my life, and everybody's...my children's life, so (laughs). Yeah, I'm absolutely telling you the truth. I saw the evidence, and it's stark! I can't tell you the exact number, because it's classified, but I'll just say, there's a few dozen total retrievals." Full exchange with video... x.com/TheUfoJoe/stat… ~~~ As I said in my other post, I think Davis, Semivan, Puthoff, Kelleher, Grusch, Lacatski, Stratton, aka The AAWSAP Gang (I just made that up), may have seen the same evidence of photos and reports. Has Grusch seen more than that? I don't know. In 2025, Davis said this... Burlison: "Can you comment on whatever species have been piloting these craft? Are they largish? Are they multiple species? What was their size, and how many are usually on a craft?" Davis: "They're typically the multiple species people are familiar with. The Greys, the Nordics. People have talked about Reptilians and Insectoids. It's not that they're Reptilian or Insectoid, it's that they resemble, to the participant, a reptile, or insect type. A humanoid, because they have this...a hand, and four limbs, and a torso, so..." Burlison: "Large? Small?" Davis: "Human size, human scale." Burlison: "How many are in a crew?" Davis: "Well, the group, well, the Greys I'm familiar with from investigating the crash at Corona, which is misnamed the crash at Roswell. It's not the crash at Roswell, it's the crash at Corona, New Mexico. Those were Greys, those were four-foot tall. And the Nordics are typically human-sized, probably...I've heard five, six-feet tall. And same with the people who mislabel Reptilian and Insectoid. They're roughly that height, too. I haven't heard anything about anything seven or eight feet or nine-foot tall, of that nature." Full post with video... x.com/TheUfoJoe/stat… ~ And this past Sunday, Davis said this to @GoodTroubleShow... Davis: "I can say to you guys that there are a minimum of four different alien species. The credibility of that ranges on the spectrum from no credibility to high credibility. The high credibility is the classified part." Full post: x.com/TheUfoJoe/stat… My Final Thoughts (Based on everything Davis has shared, it seems he saw classified photos of what appeared to him to be non-human craft and photos that appeared to show dead non-humans (bodies) with enough detail that he could see that some resembled reptiles and others resembled insects. Were there also photos of Greys and beings that looked human (Nordic)? I don't know. These images of non-humans would fall into what Davis deemed "high credibility" and "the classified part.") Davis: "I saw the evidence, and it's stark!" (If Davis saw close-up photos that showed details of beings that looked like Reptilians and Mantids, I'd say that qualifies as stark!) Back to what Fox said... Fox: "Then, what Mr. Grusch revealed to all of us, what he had seen with his own eyes, left the room speechless. It drew the oxygen out of the room. I looked at everybody in that room, and their eyeballs were popping out. My jaw was on the floor. Like, I simply couldn't believe what he'd seen with his own eyes." (I think what caused that reaction was Grusch describing seeing close-up photos of different types of non-human beings. Maybe.) However, Fox also said this: "...if you can imagine, if you know about 'Moment of Contact,' that involves captured non-human intelligent beings (This is the Varginha, Brazil case. ~Joe). Think about that for a minute. Think about that case. I heard it out of his mouth, and I can tell you, I was in the room." (The biggest CLAIM in that film and from that case is that a live, non-human being was captured and that Dr. Italo saw video of it, and then stood next to it for a few minutes when it was in the hospital, in a bed, being cared for by another doctor. Did Grusch say he saw evidence (photos or videos) of a live being that appeared to be non-human? Joe Rogan asked him that in his November 2023 interview... Grusch: "Once you realize the phenomenon's real, then you realize we've recovered artifacts and, you know, biologics or, you know, dead pilots, if you will, even though it's kind of creepy to think about in your world view. You don't think they were ever, you know, alive sometimes, too, right? And I'll leave it at that, only because, you know, that is something the President and his cabinet need to disclose this in a controlled manner." (He was either hinting that he's seen them alive or that them being alive and on this planet is a huge deal and not his responsibility to announce. I think it's the latter.) Rogan: "Are there discussions of interactions with live beings?" Grusch: "Uhh, there was some water-cooler talk about that kind of thing." Rogan: "But that's it?" Grusch: "But, you know, I don't even wanna get into it because it's like, uh, there was some details provided to me but it's like, it's secondary and I don't know if that's like, the telephone game and I don't know if it was hyperbolized in any way...um, you know, in the break room, so to speak. So I just... I'm so anal about making sure what I say is accurate...I don't, you know, I don't know." (Based on what he said there, it seems like he has NOT seen any evidence of live beings. If he now comes out and says that he has, it will seem like a flip flop. So, I'm gonna go with Grusch said he saw photos of non-human bodies and they were of the different types/species that Dr. Eric Davis referenced. One more flashback to what Davis said in that public, congressional briefing in May of 2025.) Davis: "It's not that they're Reptilian or Insectoid, it's that they resemble, to the participant, a reptile, or insect type." (That sounds like someone who has seen exactly what they look like, via photos.) Final point... "Examine biological evidence of living or deceased non-human intelligence." ~Burlison Proposed Legislation (That language was in the original UAPD Disclosure Act co-sponsored by Senators Schumer and Rounds, and four other senators. Why put that language in there if you haven't heard credible reports of living or deceased (bodies) non-human intelligence? Are there stories of living, non-humans on this planet? Yes, and I'll leave you with one of them.) x.com/TheUfoJoe/stat… ) (Just to make it clear: I think Grusch will say that he saw clear photos of different types of non-human bodies and some looked like reptiles and others looked like insects. It would be amazing to hear Grusch say he saw video or film of living beings, but I don't expect that. However...this still bothers me... Would Grusch describing seeing photos of craft and different kinds of dead aliens leave veteran-of-the-UFO-field, James Fox, with his jaw on the floor? I guess we're gonna see. And hopefully soon.)

Do Mormons believe in Bigfoot? Some members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) hold a folk belief that Bigfoot is actually Cain, the biblical figure who murdered his brother Abel. This idea stems from an 1835 account by early LDS apostle David W. Patten, who claimed to have encountered a tall, hairy, dark-skinned being identifying himself as Cain while riding on a mule in Tennessee. Patten’s story was later included in Spencer W. Kimball’s 1969 book, The Miracle of Forgiveness, which gave the tale wider circulation among Mormons. The description of Cain as a large, hair-covered wanderer cursed to roam the earth indefinitely led some to connect him to Bigfoot, especially after a wave of Bigfoot sightings in South Weber, Utah, in 1980. By the 1990s, local residents began associating these sightings with Cain, and the idea gained traction in Mormon folklore. Many Latter-day Saints today view the Cain-Bigfoot connection as an intriguing but non-doctrinal piece of cultural folklore, often shared as a campfire tale or during Halloween season, rather than a serious theological stance. The church itself takes no official position on Bigfoot or Cain’s fate, and the story remains a blend of Mormon tradition and American cryptozoological legend.

🚨 Bigfoot Body Found! 👣 NY Post & News Nation Say Yes—But Here’s Why It’s a Clear Hoax 😐 Fellow Bigfoot enthusiasts and truth-seekers—you’ve likely seen the recent NY Post and News Nation stories claiming “Snake the Bigfoot Hunter” recovered a full 8-foot Sasquatch body he calls “Dack” in the Adirondacks, complete with DNA allegedly proving a 58.5% Neanderthal / 41.5% human hybrid. For those newer to the topic, the headlines can feel like a long-awaited breakthrough. But this is a textbook hoax, and it’s worth breaking down clearly so the patterns are easy to spot next time. The coverage often repeats the sensational claims (Cornell DNA testing, hybrid results) with minimal scrutiny. That’s why many of you have reached out asking if it’s legitimate. Let’s cut through the hype with straightforward questions and context. Key red flags that reveal the hoax: • The “body” has already been paraded at local fairs (last year’s NY State Fair drew thousands of visitors; another run is planned). Real scientific evidence doesn’t premiere as paid exhibition fodder. • Logistics strain credulity: Transporting and preserving a 300 lb decomposing corpse from remote woods? No detailed chain of custody or credible explanation of how it was accomplished. • No support from prominent researchers. The community hungers for verifiable proof—yet established voices like Matthew Moneymaker dismissed it as fraud early. Genuine evidence would draw serious investigators, not silence or rejection. • DNA assertions without substance: No public report, raw data, peer review, or independent confirmation. Cornell has not validated the story. • Timing and motive: Claims ramp up right before fair season and book promotion—classic grift pattern. • Production quality on earlier videos from Snake is notably poor and unconvincing. This isn’t an isolated incident. It recycles a familiar playbook. Rick Dyer’s 2012 “Hank” hoax—a toured “body” later admitted as a latex/foam/camel hair prop—shows striking facial and stylistic similarities to “Dack.” Tom Biscardi has a documented history of comparable hyped discoveries that never produced real science. These cycles rely on big announcements, ticketed exhibits, merch, and books while delivering zero transparent evidence. Many dedicated Bigfoot researchers feel legitimate frustration. Their careful field work and analysis get overshadowed, reinforcing the “all a joke” stigma that mainstream science and media love to apply. It hinders progress for everyone serious about the mystery. Personally, I don’t let hoaxers offend or deter me. I’ve learned not to tie my efforts to what others think or say. My path isn’t about proving Bigfoot to the world or winning arguments with skeptics. It’s about deepening understanding through honest research and sharing reliable insights with like-minded friends and researchers. That focus keeps the work freeing and productive no matter the noise. Tired of the smoke and hype with these claims? I keep it honest, down-to-earth, and evidence-based here—real analysis and respectful discussion for those who actually want to know more about Bigfoot. 👣🪶 The Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Sabe question deserves rigorous curiosity, not recycled carnival tactics. When sensational stories drop, ask: Where’s the full data? Who independently verifies? What’s the actual motive behind the timing and promotion? What red flags jump out to you in this coverage? Have you spotted similar patterns in past claims? Share your observations respectfully below—let’s foster better conversations and critical thinking today. #Bigfoot #Sasquatch #CriticalThinking #TruthSeeking


