Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ

22.9K posts

Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ banner
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ

Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ

@michaelgarfield

๐Ÿ“๐ŸŽจ๐ŸŽธ expert generalist ๐ŸŽ™๐Ÿ“š #humansontheloop ๐Ÿ“ฏ comms director @aicacporg ๐Ÿฆš ex @sfiscience @longnow @mozilla ๐Ÿ† https://t.co/FtNzIhJwgc

Santa Fe, NM + The Noosphere ๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ Ekim 2007
3.2K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰7.1K ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
๊ณ ์ •๋œ ํŠธ์œ—
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfieldยท
Where to place your attention is without question a moral act. This is the understanding I am trying to help inject into the conversation around generative large language models. The more people energize worst-case outcomes the more we guarantee them. If we can help people get enough distance from their knee-jerk fear response to reflect on their own minds and, as the bumper sticker says, not believe everything they think, we can interrupt the fear stream with an executive reallocation mandate that brings us rapidly and coherently closer to worlds we actually want to live in. Silicon Valley is having a bad trip right now. It needs spiritual guidance if we are to live the promise of these tools.
English
17
22
151
18.4K
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Beatriz Villarroel
Beatriz Villarroel@DrBeaVillarroelยท
What a lovely surprise this morning! โ˜€๏ธIndependent detections of similar transients in European plate archives โ€” exactly the kind of cross-validation this field needs. So itโ€™s not just Palomar anymore. The study was carried out by a retired NASA scientist. This is how a signal begins to emerge from the noise. arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20407
Beatriz Villarroel tweet media
English
264
759
4K
629.1K
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfieldยท
Is tech the god of a secular modern worldโ€”and if so, what will it take to effect the kind of culture change we need to find a wiser relationship with it? In the spicy, nuanced discussion that followed a short presentation on @forlifeitself's latest white paperย โ€”ย including myself, @developingjen of Denizen, @wxswxs of Orbital Studies, and numerous other admired peers โ€”ย we set probes into the relationship between exponential technology, economics, governance, and the changing nature of selfhood in the Digital Era. We brought some great questions into focus, and set the table for immensely generative 'adversarial collaboration' to come. Hope you'll stay in the thick of it with us.
Life Itself@forlifeitself

๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธWatch the recording of the In Tech We Trust white paper launch: youtube.com/watch?v=NgIjGnโ€ฆ @rufuspollock (co-author) presents a summary of the paper's key ideas & core takeaways, followed by rich comments & reflections from @developingjen @michaelgarfield @SylvieShiwei @wxswxs

English
0
0
2
163
ZACH โœด๏ธ
ZACH โœด๏ธ@zachtdavidsonยท
.@stewartbrand once asked: โ€œWhy havenโ€™t we seen an image of the whole earth?โ€ Without knowing it at the time, this question became the foundation of his lifeโ€™s work. What came from it? - The Whole Earth Catalog - โ€œWe are as gods and might as well get good at itโ€ - The Long Now Foundation (and clock) - and so much more Recently I pondered a similar question: โ€œWhy havenโ€™t we solved The Hard Problem of Consciousness?โ€ Just as Stewart devoted his life to the whole earth and the long now, I want to devote this next chapter of my life to answering to The Consciousness Question in various forms. Through foundational spaces, tools, and treatises, I think we have a shot understanding why this question is so hard to answer, and in that pursuit, we may find some other fun stuff too. But I canโ€™t go on this journey alone - we will need to team up with likeminded travelers, each on their own journey, pursuing aligned paths. Through these collaborative relationships, we may be able to create a Collective Consciousness and Scenius around The Hard Problem. I have a feeling thatโ€™s a good place to start, and the end doesnโ€™t even enter my consciousness rn. If this resonates and youโ€™d like to contribute to this project, please reach out - Iโ€™d love to connect with you! sb.longnow.org/SB_homepage/Whโ€ฆ
English
7
6
27
2.8K
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfieldยท
The Discord server (one of them, anyway) is doing what it's supposed to! Can't wait for the group that formed here to launch. Amazing set of conversations recorded over the last few weeks detailing some of the fundamental thinking in our work on decentralized trust, high-dimensional mapping, and regenerative flow funding.
โฟป patcon (is in Toronto) ๐Ÿฆ‹ @patcon.bsky.social@patcon_

Thanks to @HexaField in @michaelgarfield's mapmakers discord for giving this thought a chance to be articulated aloud :) The homology of linear narrative and linear peptides is a deep interest for me...! bsky.app/profile/patconโ€ฆ

English
0
0
4
293
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Judea Pearl
Judea Pearl@yudapearlยท
Models specified by "action conditioned" knowledge, as in classical control theory, are surely "causal" but are not "world models" in the causal sense. The former requires specifying the effect of every action or combination of actions; the latter permits the derivation of such effects from a compact description of (causal relationships in) the world, not of actions. To appreciate the difference, see "Does Obesity Shorten Life? Or is it the Soda? ucla.in/2EpxcNU Another way to appreciate the difference is to consider a city road-map, as an example of world model, and contrast it with GPS instructions, "Go right, left or straight", which contain the same information about approaching the destination, but not about handling unforeseen road blocks.
English
4
10
60
6K
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfieldยท
New episode of #HumansOnTheLoop! Today's conversation is with AI ethicist and organizational trust expert Nathan Kinch of Trustworthy By Design, asking questions like: How do institutions made of decent, well-meaning people continue to behave out of alignment with their stated values? How do we dig ourselves out of a catastrophic collapse in trust? How can we design practical, participatory โ€œliving labsโ€ for organizational reflection and facilitate convivial, playful environments for working together? If you are caught in a system of technologically mediated social dilemmas โ€” and who isnโ€™t? โ€” this will speak to you, and Iโ€™m excited to share it. Dig in wherever you go for podcasts. More primer: Nate is amazing. An AI Ethicist for Services Australia, heโ€™s worked with major organizations including Microsoft, Autodesk, Northwesternโ€™s Kellogg School of Management, Telus, Open Banking, and the Autralian Governmentโ€™s Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment. He is the Philosopher in Residence at CoLabs Australia, a Guest Lecturer at Swinburne University of Technology, led Ethics in Action at The RSA, works as a Reviewer for IEEEโ€™s Transactions on Technology and Society, and co-owns the artist collective Nightfall Worldwide. As we frequently observe on this show, we need to rework our ideas of agency and identity to adapt them to advances in our understanding of complex systems. Decisions emerge within a nexus of nested, multi-scale dynamics, and our species flourishes or fumbles in intricate symbiotic relationships with the collective intelligences embodied in cultural technologies like states, markets, corporations, and social clubs โ€” beings that, by any reasonable account, live in worlds alien to our own lived experience and demonstrate their own goals and values. Getting them to behave in ways that nourish us requires a much more nuanced theory of change than that which created them in the first place, perhaps even a radically different vision of the links between biology, psychology, society, and environment. And given that AI is a beast of a similar order to these other โ€œegregoresโ€ โ€” the entities of collective computation that arise from our efforts to coordinate at scale and then impose their own top-down causal influence on our thoughts and actions โ€” learning how to align individual and organizational purpose can give us profound insight into how to live well alongside (or in the proverbial guts of) newer, more obvious forms of non-human intelligence like LLMs. In other words, the โ€œintent-to-actionโ€ gap in corporate ethics and the โ€œpaperclip machineโ€ problem in our built wilderness of black box super-machines are structurally identical. And if we can โ€œtameโ€ the secular gods of the modern industrial era , our self-domesticated species may actually still get a chance at living in a zoo of our own choosing.
English
0
1
1
121
Joscha Bach
Joscha Bach@Plinzยท
Now would be a good time to start a peer-to-peer search engine that disrupts Google, by optimizing search results for what ... gasp ... users want. LLMs can help with that. We can keep costs down by holding the cache in overlapping, decentralized nodes
English
32
17
353
13.9K
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfieldยท
@scottdomes Oy vey see also Chalmers' "Hard Problem" With a few exceptions, nearly every academic I know thinks we don't have this and may never. I know hundreds of people for whom this is the simplest and most obvious thing
English
0
0
0
142
scott ๐ŸŒž
scott ๐ŸŒž@scottdomesยท
the more you think yourself intelligent, the more likely you'll believe that the solution to your problems is something complex & sophisticated which tends to make you blind to simple truths like "do more of what feels right in your body"
English
4
19
190
3.7K
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfieldยท
Surely someone considers it worthwhile at this point to trace the tangled histories and futures of the techno-thriller as self-fulfilling prophecy and entertainment media + biotech + computing, from ARPA to Disney to Jurassic Park to COVID and the LLM revolution:
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfield

@4tlex @deepfates Yeah there's a whole book in here I'll write once I find the time/money docs.google.com/document/d/1GWโ€ฆ

English
0
0
0
258
๐ŸŽญ
๐ŸŽญ@deepfatesยท
Realized yesterday that Westworld is just Jurassic Park with robots instead of dinosaurs. Michael Crichton found the infinite money button
English
10
4
89
3.8K
Leighton
Leighton@lay2000lbsยท
If I were starting a company today I'd be hiring artists, poets, historians, and philosophers The "office" would have no desks, a living room with an espresso machine, bar, and smoking porch Building & operations are outsourced to AI, just need dreamers.
English
120
77
991
48.4K
Louis Arge
Louis Arge@louisvargeยท
so many of the questions i have right now hinge on a good theory of consciousness being discovered if i was a rational person, i should think about how to accelerate this effort as much as possible wdyt would be most useful?
English
44
2
96
5.9K
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfieldยท
@owocki Agency is indeed worth more than ever. Do you know @add_hawk? Read his latest book! And then invite him on your show. I'd love to hear you two in dialogue. I'll try and remember to send you the link to our chat when it's live. x.com/michaelgarfielโ€ฆ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfield

Just spoke with the brilliant @add_hawk (our third!) for Humans On The Loop about his @penguinpress book The Score โ€” this is the most accessible and enjoyable read I've ever found on the #philosophy of games, how the metrics we use to coordinate at scale also wash out vital context and variety, and how to stay human in a mechanical age. Easily one of the deepest and most important conversations I've had in over 360 #podcasts. This book needs to be on your shelf! Our episode will be out in a few weeks, so play the game and "smash that button" wherever you go to listen so you'll be ready โ€” this work will help you learn to see the hidden ways that systems define your values, and the hope to be found in #GameDesign for futures where cultures foster agency and identity as art forms. (Seriously, look at all those tabs! This book is amazing, easy to read, and will change you โ€” even if a lot of these ideas are already familiar. And our conversation used it as a launchpad for a huge and awe-inspiring inquiry into our relationship with technology, language, and how we might reconcile what matters to each of us personally with what matters to our institutions...I'm especially eager to share this with all of my friends working on the Decentralized Web and CivTech, but equally with all of my goofy gamer buddies. It's that big.)

English
0
0
1
90
owocki
owocki@owockiยท
Code is Worth $0 Now AI collapsed the marginal cost of writing software. You can generate, refactor, and rebuild entire codebases faster than ever. That doesnโ€™t make software worthless. It moves the scarcity up the stack. The value is no longer in typing code. Itโ€™s in deciding what should exist. Itโ€™s taste. Itโ€™s initiative. Itโ€™s iteration. Code was the bottleneck. Now agency is.
English
20
4
55
3.4K
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfieldยท
@MattPirkowski Totally. You'll dig this conversation when it comes out. The whole issue of technology as drugs is so big, so rich, so important. x.com/michaelgarfielโ€ฆ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfield

Just spoke with the brilliant @add_hawk (our third!) for Humans On The Loop about his @penguinpress book The Score โ€” this is the most accessible and enjoyable read I've ever found on the #philosophy of games, how the metrics we use to coordinate at scale also wash out vital context and variety, and how to stay human in a mechanical age. Easily one of the deepest and most important conversations I've had in over 360 #podcasts. This book needs to be on your shelf! Our episode will be out in a few weeks, so play the game and "smash that button" wherever you go to listen so you'll be ready โ€” this work will help you learn to see the hidden ways that systems define your values, and the hope to be found in #GameDesign for futures where cultures foster agency and identity as art forms. (Seriously, look at all those tabs! This book is amazing, easy to read, and will change you โ€” even if a lot of these ideas are already familiar. And our conversation used it as a launchpad for a huge and awe-inspiring inquiry into our relationship with technology, language, and how we might reconcile what matters to each of us personally with what matters to our institutions...I'm especially eager to share this with all of my friends working on the Decentralized Web and CivTech, but equally with all of my goofy gamer buddies. It's that big.)

English
0
0
1
49
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ@michaelgarfieldยท
Just spoke with the brilliant @add_hawk (our third!) for Humans On The Loop about his @penguinpress book The Score โ€” this is the most accessible and enjoyable read I've ever found on the #philosophy of games, how the metrics we use to coordinate at scale also wash out vital context and variety, and how to stay human in a mechanical age. Easily one of the deepest and most important conversations I've had in over 360 #podcasts. This book needs to be on your shelf! Our episode will be out in a few weeks, so play the game and "smash that button" wherever you go to listen so you'll be ready โ€” this work will help you learn to see the hidden ways that systems define your values, and the hope to be found in #GameDesign for futures where cultures foster agency and identity as art forms. (Seriously, look at all those tabs! This book is amazing, easy to read, and will change you โ€” even if a lot of these ideas are already familiar. And our conversation used it as a launchpad for a huge and awe-inspiring inquiry into our relationship with technology, language, and how we might reconcile what matters to each of us personally with what matters to our institutions...I'm especially eager to share this with all of my friends working on the Decentralized Web and CivTech, but equally with all of my goofy gamer buddies. It's that big.)
Michael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ tweet mediaMichael Garfield ๐Ÿ”ฎ tweet media
English
0
0
1
245

ํƒ์ƒ‰

@forlifeitself @rufuspollock @developingjen @SylvieShiwei @wxswxs @zachtdavidson @stewartbrand @Plinz