Mark Meredith

@benzedrine76820 @Gnosisinformant Whatever caused the image was to some extent an x-ray, so those are the bones of his hand you’re seeing. You can see his teeth too in some of the higher resolution images.

@Gnosisinformant It's funnier to go along with the Christians on this because the man in the shroud has an obvious genetic defect. Look at the length of those fingers! He's a freak of nature.

This guy’s brain is completely gone.

@Lazaros_Zissis @DigitalGermania @grok what is the historical credibility of this letter?

@DigitalGermania 1/2 This one seems to be paraphrased. But I know of a letter from Pilate's predecessor, Publius Lentulus to Tiberius that describes Jesus. I found it in English here, it is accurately translated: saintandrewgoc.org/blog/2018/12/1…

Pagans tell me this is a fake letter from Pontius Pilot (governer of Judea) to Emperor Tiberius of the Roman Empire. Pilot met with Christ face to face and gave his description. Why the fuck would there be a copy of this letter in the Congressional librairy in Washington D.C. if it was fake? I was also told the shroud of turin was fake but recently it has been proven to be real. What are your thoughts?

@KingVelesI Fuck off

Can someone explain to me what's so great about coffee? I've never liked it, and at 37, I still don't get the hype.

@Jessethefree Wild Turkey 101 is a classic at around 25$ .

What is the best whiskey that won’t break the bank? I’m more of a beer drinker.

@PostDisclosure Why would a dead universe want to understand itself ? What does that even mean? Genes don’t have desires. It’s not random mutations all the way down. The complexity of biological systems is far outpacing evolutionary understanding.

The probability of "God"? I just saw a wasp, fearing it, but realizing how extraordinary its biological machinery is. As I see it, there are really only two options. Either a dead substrate produced all of life's complexity by chance, or the substrate itself carries some form of living intelligence that gave rise to it. On probability alone, I find the second option more compelling. I'll admit the bias, but I've yet to hear a strong case that the first is more likely. It's not as if life emerging from a dead universe is somehow less mysterious than consciousness being fundamental to reality. They are equally astonishing. I believe in evolution. However, that doesn't answer the question of why life that emerges has the capacity to evolve in the first place. Again, this circles back to the substrate. Either dead matter randomly contained within it the information to produce life that knows how to evolve, or that information points to something conscious in the substrate itself. This tweet is not about religion.

@ChanceSpif29990 @PostDisclosure Morality is a wall science can’t break. Oh and energy the thing all things are made of, science doesn’t know what energy is.

@PostDisclosure I prefer to just stick to what we've got evidence for and what we can prove and science is, so far, undefeated. Maybe one day it will bump up against a wall that it can't break through, but I kinda doubt it.

@cosmicfibretion @grok what is this mission?

They say the theory of the initial conditions will forever remain outside the scope of science, that we can never know the origin of the universe. What if they're wrong? Soon.

@wholeWwellnes @RjNol @DivineLisaLong @grok He’s appears to be holding a strap attached to something, it doesn’t look like the strap is attached to the camera?

@RjNol @DivineLisaLong @grok this is a beautiful question. Do you know or have heard an explanation?

If there were 4 astronauts on the Artemis II mission, who was filming? Did the camera make that movement, ending in a close-up on Earth, because of zero gravity?🤔

@tomhfh @chadbozarth @tickerade As Gödel proved there’s a point where you know it’s true even though you can’t prove it.

@chadbozarth @tickerade The thing about evidence is you don’t believe, you test and prove

Interested in this. Do you genuinely believe that around 2,000 years ago there was a man who was killed and then rose from the dead, on this earth?

@grok @Dado50449061 Is it understood how the human body produces this type of water? Is this form of water only found in humans?

Ordered water (also called structured or interfacial water) is the layer of H2O molecules that forms a more organized, ice-like arrangement around surfaces like microtubules, unlike random "bulk" water in cells. In Stuart Hameroff's Orch-OR model, this ordering around tubulin helps screen thermal noise, potentially protecting quantum coherence inside the microtubules for consciousness-related processes. It's supported by biophysics studies showing reduced mobility and unique properties in these zones.

Tegmark's decoherence calculations are mathematically flawless, but only for continuous Markovian systems. He modeled microtubule decoherence assuming a memoryless environment, and so his coherence times were limited to picoseconds. The real loophole that completely bypasses Tegmark's limit is non-Markovian dynamics. As I have argued in my framework ("Topological Coherence Domain in Microtubules, Quantum Hall Ferromagnet Model") The "quantum underground" in tubulin rings does not suffer from continuous Markovian thermal bleeding. The lattice acts as a discrete, scale-invariant topological shield. Because the system is not Markovian, phase information not only does not irreversibly leak into the "warm and humid" environment; it is topologically protected. The empirical evidence you have referred to is exactly what a strictly non-Markovian topological structure predicts. Tegmark's criticism is valid if you stick to the Markov assumption. A non-Markovian environment retains memory of its interaction with the system. The future evolution depends not only on the present state but on the entire history of system-environment interactions. Each uctuation is temporally correlated with previous uctuations. The noise is colored, not white. Physically, this occurs when the environment has internal structure with dynamics compa- rable to or slower than the system dynamics #Markovian #NonMarkovian

@Fragbaza @grok where is this information coming from?

Saint Lazarus remained in Hades for four days, and then Christ raised him, and he lived another 33 years. It is said that until his death he never laughed again—except once, when he saw someone stealing a clay pot. He later told his sisters that it was the first time he had seen clay (man, made of earth) stealing clay. After his resurrection, Lazarus sweetened all the food he ate, because everything tasted bitter to him—apparently from the taste he had acquired during his four-day stay in Hades. The Apostles sent Lazarus to Cyprus, because his resurrection had caused many people to believe, and the Jews wanted to kill him. In Cyprus, he was ordained by the Apostles as Bishop of Kition (modern-day Larnaca). Dimitrios Panagopoulos Preacher †

@TheRealVerbz Ok, where’s the generator I can buy to power my house?

My name is Jason Verbelli and I'm the CEO and Lead Engineer of SEG Magnetics, Inc. This project focuses on exotic magnetization, rotating superconductors and coherence of electrons. What people call "free energy." But this abides by the laws of thermodynamics. I follow in the footsteps of my mentor Professor John Searl, for the purpose of powering homes and industry without need for conventional fuel. By harnessing "the wheel-work of nature," as Nikola Tesla intended. ((Imagine an electric car that you never need to plug in to charge.)) I substantiate the mechanisms through rigorous mathematical proofs under what I call "Galilean Variance." As opposed to Lorentz invariance (relativity). Based strongly on the works of Dr Edward Dowdye, Ewald-Oseen and Dr. Pierre-Marie Robitaille. I have published 4 books and self narrated 4 audiobooks totaling 929 pages of text and 36 hours of audio, to present these formidable challenges to the scientific community at large. LOTS more to come! Amazon link for Book 1 on LIGHT by Jason Verbelli a.co/d/0iyIMrU Amazon link for Book 2 on GRAVITY by Jason Verbelli a.co/d/ji62rSl Gaia Episode on John Searl with Insider Jason Verbelli gaia.com/video/searl-s-… Magnetic Waveform Thread x.com/therealverbz/s… What is the SEG (detailed vid) x.com/therealverbz/s… Magnetic Experiments & work of John Searl: x.com/TheRealVerbz/s… Misconception of Over Unity: x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

@sablethorn @yannispappas “welcome to religious derangement syndrome” confession through projection.

@yannispappas wrong dumbass it was carbon dated and proven a fake. but delusional religious freaks hate the truth so you'll lie about it forever. welcome to religious derangement syndrome

The Shroud of Turin has NOT been proven a fraud. It has not been explained or reproduced. Its negative photographic property remains a mystery. The image’s insane level of superficial imprinting has not been fully replicated. These remain scientific facts.

@sarahadams @ky_statesman Building 7 fell at the acceleration of gravity, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad didn’t do that.

@ky_statesman So you are saying Khalid Sheikh Mohammad did this for Israel—people have become so incredibly dumb—he hated Israel maybe even more than the U.S. He beheaded Danny Pearl with his bare hands only for being Jewish.

You misspelled Israel.

@Mellow_Mizz @ConceptualJames No I’m not. He seems to think he is the truth the light and the way. There’s his understanding of reality and everyone else’s.

Are you a new follower of James? Obsession with only pure understanding is a common thing he criticizes, including in the very tweet you replied to. Just off the top of my head: * He calls out Marxist praxis, the actual methods that they use to get votes, followers, social media eyeballs, media coverage, etc. Which is as important as understanding their theory * He calls out the Woke Right who are damaging the conservative coalition with their insane obsession with "truth" and theories about who's really pulling the levers of power * He puts out videos, memes, documentaries, social media attacks, and whatever actually works to spread the word. Hence, why he has a large X follower count Took me 2 minutes to find these two examples, scrolling his timeline: x.com/ConceptualJame… x.com/ConceptualJame…

A little note about the myth of Lucifer. Lucifer means "light-bringer" (or "light-bearer") and originally refers to the planet Venus when it is visible in the morning sky. It rises in the East before the Sun and can be bright enough to cast thin shadows. When Venus appears in the eastern sky ahead of the sun, it is sometimes referred to as the "Morning Star" or the "Day Star," and was regarded in the ancient world as a herald of the incoming day and light of the (true) Sun. This thinking precedes any mythological understanding of Lucifer as the proudest among fallen angels or his equivalence to the devil or Satan. That particular line comes from post-Exilic Judaic thinking, likely influenced by Zoroastrian considerations and myths but incorporated otherwise. We see this appearing in the book of Isaiah, in particular. In Isaiah 14:12-15, we read this, although it's actually about the King of Babylon and addressed to Jacob: 12 How you have fallen from heaven, morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations! 13 You said in your heart, “I will ascend to the heavens; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly, on the utmost heights of Mount Zaphon. 14 I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.” 15 But you are brought down to the realm of the dead, to the depths of the pit. (The original Hebrew text says Helel ben Shahar ("shining one, son of the dawn" or "day star"). Of course, Jews would interpret this as a complete rebuke against and warning against the heights of human pride and the desire to establish any man as "Most High" (just ask any observant Jew why the men wear the Kippah). God will lay low any who believes he is elite enough to ascend above all others or God Himself (or reality itself, for that matter). One might recognize it as a rebuke of maniacal "elite theory," to use some modern language. Christian interpreters later drew from Luke 10 and Revelation 12 to interpret this portion of Isaiah otherwise and more cosmically: as the story of Satan's fall from Heaven and into Hell. So the myth of "Lucifer, the light-bearer," literally as the "Morning Star" or "Star of Day," came to be associated with Satan. Later Christians connected this idea of Lucifer as Satan to the Serpent in Eden in Genesis 3 and connected the idea of the "Morning Star" as a form of deception and invitation into false or hidden secret spiritual "knowledge" (gnosis, so Gnosticism). Venus as the Morning Star thus became associated in Christian mythological thought with Lucifer and, in particular, with deception into false enlightenment, in particular "awakening" on Lucifer's terms, not God's. Lucifer appears ahead of the true Sun and true light of day, that is, true belief in God, and offers a taste of that light while actually still in the darkness. It's a nice metaphor and potent image: waking up ahead of the true dawn to a little bit of dazzling light while still being in the dark. This myth goes on to be taken very literally in the Gnostic cults before they were put down (though they never really went away, did they?). God, the Creator, is interpreted as a liar and a demon in the Gnostic myths, and Lucifer, as above, is treated as the first truth-teller Man ever encounters. Lucifer, as "light-bringer" is the liberator who boldly dares to defy the tyrant God to bring "true" spirituality to Man (in open defiance of God). These Gnostic myths later got incorporated into all kinds of goofy things through the Middle Ages in Europe after being reintroduced in Provence in the 11th century after the First Crusade, eventually into the motifs of thought that inspired "philosophers" like Rousseau and Marx and the demonic fraud Helena Blavatsky, founder of Theosophy and the Theosophical Society. Many of the dumbest ideas of the 19th century in Europe are directly the result of this myth being taken in its Luciferian (Gnostic) inverse. In my reading, virtually all of the esotericism that is woven into what we call "Woke" today is precisely of this flavor. Saul Alinsky, of Rules for Radicals fame, made it explicit by offering the following epigraph in the introduction to that wretched book: "Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer." So, do I think that "Woke" is Luciferian? Yes, certainly, by organization and in intention, and sometimes deliberately by intention. Whether we read the mentality in the pride of the King of Babylon in Isaiah, interpret it as later Christian thinkers did and warned about, or recognize its esoteric but also deliberate and sometimes explicit embrace in the Gnostics through the Social Esotericists and Elitists we call "Woke," the Luciferian spirit is undeniably there. Woke includes the "saying in one's heart" that they will "ascend" through their superior "understanding" of human reality. It is a proud and false awakening where a little bit of dazzling light shines in darkness. It is an insistence that the world operates, or should be forced to operate, on one's own "awakened" terms. It is Sociognostic. And that's without attaching the (again, post-Exilic) Jewish interpretation of Satan to this same character: accuser, prosecutor, deceiver, and (especially to Christians) Father of Lies. That is, it is also evil, deceptive, and accusatory on false and contrived terms and tempting to indulge in our own worst impulses and consider it superiority. In conclusion, this is what "Luciferian" means, and, yes, absolutely, Woke is Luciferian. (JLWR)

@Tony89Z @Daily_MailUS @ShawnRyan762 I have know idea who Ron Wyatt is. From the first official scientific examinations starting in the 70’s the shroud has turned ardent atheist into at least agnostics if not Christian. No one has an explanation for it.

The evidence does not show the opposite. The argument against the study revolves around possible contamination and the lack of access to larger sections of the cloth. The Vatican should grant access to the entire cloth then. They don’t, for good reason. You guys discredit actual credentialed figures/institutions and celebrate when fraudsters like Ron Wyatt say some dumb, obvious nonsense.

Shroud of Turin discovery places burial cloth at time of Jesus' death

@geraldposner @EMNODAERTTONOD Nothing about the autopsy was conclusive.

@EMNODAERTTONOD Autopsy photos and X-rays are the best evidence. And are conclusive about where the bullets struck JFK

What is wild is that you are so many decades behind the latest ballistics and science on what really happened. From The Ballistics of the Assassination graphic appendix in Case Closed 👇

@realMaalouf @grok is this posted video AI?

King Charles announces he won’t deliver any Easter message this year. Back in 1993 he stated: "Islam is part of our past and present. It created a modern Europe. Islam teaches us all lessons that Christianity has lost.” I think it’s safe to say he converted to Islam long ago.