Post Disclosure World

New video! Only 10 People on Earth Know What’s Actually Happening youtu.be/P6PuqcFGZ-M

@OvermanBridge @michaelshermer @ericweinstein Where did Eric say that or is that just a straw man construction?

@michaelshermer @ericweinstein “We don’t need evidence to make bold claims today because we now have evidence that certain things happened in the past that we didn’t have evidence for at that time” ??? What?

My response to @ericweinstein (Eric's quoted comment, my response): "Yeah…nah. Here’s what I think is happening instead. I haven’t wanted to say this, but there is a problem with organized Skepticism even more than conspiracy theories." Eric, you have been telling me this for about a decade, and since I am the publisher of Skeptic magazine I have invited you to contribute an article on what you consider to be the problem with “organized Skepticism” and I’m still waiting. The offer stands. If you have something to say about skepticism, then say it in a publication in addition to a tweet. “My claim is that from hard evidence NOT ONE of the following is an extraordinary claim: The CIA not only gathers intelligence but kills people, violates rights, gaslights and evades scrutiny and oversight. The U.S. hides bioweapons programs. The U.S. engages in regime change through charity and aid programs. We in the U.S. medically experiment on our own citizens without consent. We run drugs. The DOJ and FBI are actively and flagrantly obstructing justice. Putin easily kills people outside Russia. We conspire and use academics for sheepskin washing our dirty work. U.S. newspapers actively avoid reporting stories about which the U.S. population is desperate for information. They also carry extremely non neutral biases. We actively conspired to hide open and obvious presidential dementia. And by extension, there are massive conspiracies at every level below that one. At a mind boggling level. There are Special Access programs that are about real and/or fake NHI/UFOs Etc." This all depends on what you mean by "extraordinary" Eric. Everything you say has an element of truth, inasmuch as they have happened, but you go too far in suggesting that they happen routinely and regularly (ordinary), such that anything that happens in the news could be construed as an example. It’s true, we know that the CIA has assassinated people, violated rights, dosed U.S. citizens with LSD (Frank Olson; MKULTRA), and has evaded scrutiny and oversight. Does that mean anytime a foreign leader dies mysteriously that it was the CIA, or could be the CIA? Of course not! That something has happened, and is a rare thing, is not the same as that it is still happening and regularly. And one reason we know about MKULTRA, the CIA’s nefarious activities overseas in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, their assassinations and attempts, their support for fascist dictators over communist dictators (because at least the fascists can be persuaded with money) was the 1975-76 Church Committee findings in which all this came out, and subsequent oversight of the agency was commenced, with much scrutiny! U.S. sponsored charity and aid programs are what is called “soft power”. It is a way of exerting our influence while also showing our generosity and moral obligation to help people in need. This is normal and good. To call it “regime change” is inaccurate. When the U.S. does that, it usually does so openly, expensively, and often stupidly. We should stick with sponsoring charity and aid programs. Agreed, Putin famously has enemies assassinated, even outside of Russia. Does that mean he had Lindsey Graham, or Charlie Kirk, or any other recognizable figure killed? Of course not! Evidence, not innuendo. Agreed, U.S. newspapers/media are notoriously biased, which is why we have freedom of the press, so you can read the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, add them up and divide by 2! More seriously, independent journalism is a market response to the biases on both sides, and today we enjoy so many journalistic sources that it is impossible to keep up. Yes, some media sources “conspired to hide open and obvious presidential dementia” (not to mention a certain president's son’s laptop), but how do we know about that? From other media sources that blasted out the story far and wide everywhere (even while much of the MSM didn’t cover it or ignored it or tried to bury it). Ditto the Twitter Files and other exposés. It's hard to hide these things in a free and open society. “The last thing we need is skeptics telling us the bar for such conspiracies and/or governmental accountability requires extraordinary evidence. Somehow the skeptics have it totally wrong. … Time for extra scientific skepticism to die I think. Covert operations and conspiracies are difficult enough to document as it is. We don’t need skeptics as self appointed referees.” Eric, I always enjoy your X posts and podcast appearances, but why not take the next step of actually writing down what it is you actually believe, and why, with references, citations, documented examples, statistical comparisons, evidence, etc. I post on X, have my own podcast, and do countless podcasts myself—absolutely nothing wrong with that. But it’s just a start. PUBLISH your ideas, especially in venues where there are fact-checkers and editors to make sure you get it right, because we ALL make errors. So…what do you think Eric, how about an article in Skeptic on the problem of organized skepticism and your proposed solutions, suggestions, recommendations, etc.? As promised, we will publish it.

A Breakdown of the 2025 ‘Orb’ Incidents (a 🧵): Late last year, an extraordinary series of UAP events caused the U.S. government to take UFOs extremely seriously. Skeptics claim the objects were “probably flares.” That is demonstrably false. But let’s start with the location…

I love that the years of conversations all of us have had privately trying to make sense of what is happening with government, business, and humanity is coming to the fold. Matthew and so many others are trying to get to the next set of questions once it is understood, officially, we are not alone. I've known Matt for quite a long time and this is one of his best pieces IMO. Amnesty and immunity will, IMO, be required to tell truths about this subject. The question is, how far do we allow it?

Yeah…nah. Here’s what I think is happening instead. I haven’t wanted to say this, but there is a problem with organized Skepticism even more than conspiracy theories. My claim is that from hard evidence NOT ONE of the following is an extraordinary claim: The CIA not only gathers intelligence but kills people, violates rights, gaslights and evades scrutiny and oversight. The U.S. hides bioweapons programs. The U.S. engages in regime change through charity and aid programs. We in the U.S. medically experiment on our own citizens without consent. We run drugs. The DOJ and FBI are actively and flagrantly obstructing justice. Putin easily kills people outside Russia. We conspire and use academics for sheepskin washing our dirty work. U.S. newspapers actively avoid reporting stories about which the U.S. population is desperate for information. They also carry extremely non neutral biases. We actively conspired to hide open and obvious presidential dementia. And by extension, there are massive conspiracies at every level below that one. At a mind boggling level. There are Special Access programs that are about real and/or fake NHI/UFOs Etc. ———— The last thing we need is skeptics telling us the bar for such conspiracies and/or governmental accountability requires extraordinary evidence. Somehow the skeptics have it totally wrong. After Watergate, Iran-Contra, COVID, Church/Pike committees, etc. these are no longer extraordinary claims to raise. They are ordinary claims. I have no idea whether Lindsay Graham died of natural causes. But I can tell you the difference between a skeptic and a scientist looking at the claim. A skeptic’s first move is to lurch for the budding conspiracy and try to pull the idea of foul play off the table first and then to require a mountain of evidence to consider such a thing. A scientist firmly grabs the skeptic’s hand and forces him to put the hypothesis back on the table and says “Uh, you’re not in charge here. There’s a history…and I’m going to need to see something other than reference to null hypotheses, William of Occam and Carl Sagan…because that’s not how science and investigation works.” Time for extra scientific skepticism to die I think. Covert operations and conspiracies are difficult enough to document as it is. We don’t need skeptics as self appointed referees.

I would love to watch this.

@thelorebewithy1 You're NOT defending religion my friend. You're only defending YOUR religion. It's not like you agree w/ other religions. My moral intuition is that eternal conscious suffering is absurd on its face. I do not believe God would do that to anyone.

@PostDisclosure Often, people of God or religious people do things against the teachings of the religion The bible affirms that we are made in the image and likeness of God. That's why we have moral values and intuitions, because of being spiritual beings living an earthly experience.

In which way? Infallible as in mathematicial or scientific? How are we measuring?

@thelorebewithy1 Here's the problem though. If we're not capable of being moral arbiters, than neither is any religion. Because all religions have bad ideas. So the solution isn't "Just follow this religion perfectly, and you can rest assured you're living morally." No, I do not buy that.

@PostDisclosure Hard ask We make ourselves the moral arbiters these days. Postmodernism stated there is no objective truth. Some people brought into that folly, now we want religion to satisfy everyone, bring truth, and satisfy objective and subjective notions of fairness? That's a big ask

I think Jordan Flowers is most likely correct. No matter what the nature of UFOs are, they are ALREADY HERE. ALREADY DOING WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND HAVE BEEN DOING. Learning about them changes nothing about our situation. We are living in that situation right now. Disclosure just makes us less ignorant. Also, for whatever it's worth, Jim Semivan has explicitly said that NOBODY actually knows for sure what's going on. If the picture is murky, then by definition, what is there to be scared about? On the contrary, we need disclosure to figure this out. To truly understand what is going on. If it's scary, then we can add that to all the other things that make life scary, such a nuclear proliferation and death. OPEN THE BOOKS!

@TheZignal Me

So…who wants to try remote viewing? Thinking of running a small group (4 or 5 people max) in the next few weeks. If you reply here, I’ll prioritise you. Totally free, sceptics welcome! Come give it go.

Our mental state is based on thoughts or perception. How absurd is that? What a strange universe.

@MusicAndTruth This is UFO world. You need to become more cynical.

@PostDisclosure This is a good thing, & I worry about the people in the replies who are acting like it's not.

Dr. Phil has become a Disclosure Advocate

@XRPall_the_cash We may all be surprised by that.

@PostDisclosure The one you discover after you’ve passed through the physical world.

If billions of civilizations have billions of different religions, which one is infallible?

Life is to be realized, not just suffered through.

@Enduristic1 You do not know that. If life is teeming in the universe, the idea that they have the same religions as us, is the least likely possibility.

@PostDisclosure There have not been billions of religions.

@nowethtruth Let me ask you this, if there are billions of civilizations out there, and we all have different religions, which one is infallible?

Can truth be known to post disclosure world ? If not then what is your position on anything anyone says including yourself ? Everything becomes what they feel is right however we do know truths like fire will burn you,water will drown you and gravity will crush you. Harm happens to all of us when we don’t follow truth but eventually it catches up to you.

One reason religious dogma irks me so deeply is that treating something rationally unethical as assumed truth is an absurd dynamic on its face. By all means, go deep into your spiritual tradition. But don't expect outsiders to be any less horrified by some of its teachings than you're rightfully horrified by some secular ideologies. Ultimately, it is my assessment that God wants us to think and to question. That is not always compatible with dogma. Surely everyone should see this.

@planethunter56 Thanks

@PostDisclosure liberationtimes.com/home/disclosur…

@planethunter56 Oh? What’s the source that some Nordics were recovered?

An illustrative primer on Nordic NHIs. And yes, some Nordic “biologics” were recovered in the 1933 Magenta, Italy UFO crash retrieval. Top secret. Also, David Groooooooosh.