Lars-Erik Larsson

4.2K posts

Lars-Erik Larsson banner
Lars-Erik Larsson

Lars-Erik Larsson

@nicjabl

Like Morès and Déroulède, he has no practical acquaintance with the world...whether of business or politics, but only the instinct of successful parade.

가입일 Mart 2016
2.9K 팔로잉131 팔로워
Lars-Erik Larsson 리트윗함
Johannes Hano
Johannes Hano@JohannesHano·
The suspension of Gil Duran from x shows that freedom of speech is an empty phrase by those who just want to dominate us. Gil is one of the most knowledgeable people concerning the ideology of the Techbros who don’t want to be challenged. They are just cowards!
Emily Mills@sf_mills

YOUR ATTENTION PLEASE: Twitter has suspended journalist Gil Duran @gilduran76 His book, The Nerd Reich: Silicon Valley Fascism and the War on Democracy comes out August 18, 2026. Read more at this link -> thenerdreich.com Preorder the book here -> simonandschuster.com/books/The-Nerd…

English
1
69
131
3.2K
Lars-Erik Larsson 리트윗함
toomas hendrik ilves
toomas hendrik ilves@IlvesToomas·
Jesus. Chief Justice John Roberts’ Wife Made Millions From Top Law Firms: Whistleblower At least one of the firms reportedly had a case before Chief Justice Roberts. thedailybeast.com/chief-justice-…
English
203
3.8K
7.3K
348.8K
Kevin Nealon
Kevin Nealon@kevin_nealon·
The unmade 'Hans and Franz' movie. I wrote it with Dana Carvey, Robert Smigel, and Conan O'Brien, mostly in a hotel in Santa Monica. Conan was doing The Simpsons at the time. Dana was doing something else. It was me and Smigel a lot of the time. It was my laptop. I would throw ideas around with him. He would always be eating chicken and he liked to touch the screen of the computer. It was my laptop. I'd see streaks of chicken grease all over my screen. Schwarzenegger wanted to co-produce and co-star in it but he had 6 films in development at the time. Arnold just parodied himself in Last Action Hero, so he opted not to do this one.
English
79
43
1.6K
130.8K
Lars-Erik Larsson 리트윗함
Blank Slate
Blank Slate@blankslate2017·
The bigger issue is that Roberts was legislating here, and that's not SCOTUS' role. Obama won the election and had the right to implement his policies. Roberts was clearly motivated on policy grounds, not legal or constitutional grounds, and had no right to intervene.
Prof Michael E. Mann@MichaelEMann

GOP-stacked SCOTUS is a threat to the planet "Even as they debated the Obama plan’s possible burden on the power industry...not a single justice...mentioned dangers of a warming planet as one of the possible harms the court should consider.” @nytimes nytimes.com/2026/04/18/us/…

English
20
222
1.2K
48.2K
Lars-Erik Larsson 리트윗함
Pablo Torre 👀
Pablo Torre 👀@PabloTorre·
EXCLUSIVE: @TheOnion tells me they've struck a (long-awaited) deal to take over Infowars. New @pablofindsout on how America's finest (fake) news source trolled Alex Jones, with the blessing of Sandy Hook families — and what @oneunderscore__ is planning next — will be up soon 👀
GIF
English
17
200
2K
222.3K
Lars-Erik Larsson 리트윗함
John Jackson
John Jackson@hissgoescobra·
This has gone too far. We cannot have tech companies that are intertwined with our national security making these types of social-engineering pronouncements. If they don’t know their place and accept it, they must be brought to heel. Time to regulate.
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

English
156
1.9K
11.6K
202.1K
Lars-Erik Larsson 리트윗함
Proton
Proton@ProtonPrivacy·
"Why should I care about privacy? I have nothing to hide". We hear it every week. Today, the company that builds software for law enforcement by mining your medical records just published a 22-point manifesto about "freedom" and "democracy". This is why you should care.
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

English
98
2.7K
15.6K
318.8K
Lars-Erik Larsson 리트윗함
Timothy Snyder
Timothy Snyder@TimothyDSnyder·
Worth adding that Russia did as a matter of fact intervene for Trump in 2016 and that the evidence is widely known, abundant, and collected in various forms, including a Senate investigation, the Mueller report, multiple intelligence investigations, multiple reportorial investigations in the US and elsewhere, and multiple books. Leaving out that crucial fact allows the reader to miss the way this echoes prior authoritarian "investigate the investigator" moves as well as the fundamentally Orwellian character of this. nytimes.com/2026/04/18/us/…
English
2.3K
4.4K
9.7K
561.5K
Julian Andreone
Julian Andreone@JulianAndreone·
The inauthenticity is copying the strategy Buttigieg & Harris already used to try to use dancing & marching to convey energy & momentum. It comes across as manufactured. The same consultant concocted political maneuvers the establishment has been using for decades in place of building real momentum/energy by engaging with working people
English
7
0
85
3.2K
Lars-Erik Larsson 리트윗함
Ron Filipkowski
Ron Filipkowski@RonFilipkowski·
Just got off the phone with the president. He told me a bunch of obvious lies but I’m going to post them anyway because I want everyone to know I just got off the phone with the president.
English
186
1.1K
12.8K
735.8K
Lars-Erik Larsson 리트윗함
Lawrence Hurley
Lawrence Hurley@lawrencehurley·
It's newsworthy in the sense that the SCOTUS majority has repeatedly in recent Trump cases indicated that the government faces irreparable harm when its policies are blocked. Here, the discussion of irreparable harm focuses exclusively on those challenging the Obama policy.
Ed Whelan@EdWhelanEPPC

NYT has obtained and published seven internal memos by Supreme Court justices in February 2016 regarding application for stay of Obama administration's Clean Power Plan. I'm skeptical that the memos are as newsworthy as NYT maintains, but the fact that *someone* leaked them to NYT is very newsworthy.

English
8
115
770
59.5K