Patoshi.bitmap 🟧 🟧 🟧

@blockamoto bitmap

Don't let $dog army take all the glory! Make yourself known in replies. #bitmappers4erin #bitmappers4casey

@rodarmor 牛逼

沉睡的巨龙已经苏醒了……中国，我需要你们的帮助！请为Erin和Casey投票，为比特币带来荣耀。

@leoX1mex Is this indexing done based on the logic mentioned above? What's the connection between the 800-starting bitmaps I searched for and the results shown, such as 514837.bitmap and 276548.bitmap?

Bitmap quietly leading in 30D sales 👀 What we’re not seeing is who’s accumulating and how much supply is actually getting locked away. What do you think is next for Bitmap? 🟧 #Bitcoin #Ordinals #Bitmap #BTC

@unisat_wallet @UrbanBor great

✨ Bitmap on UniSat Ordinals Marketplace Based on user feedback, we now support a more intuitive trading experience for Bitmaps on UniSat Marketplace. • One-click bulk buy • ZERO service fee trading • Also available under the "New" tab 👉 Explore Bitmap on UniSat: unisat.io/market/names?d…

@Crypto_Yapp @sdongjini I saw one ai agent living in 16739.bitmap wow it’s a patoshi bitmap meanwhile.

Most distributed Ordinals collection ever Patoshi rares, district builds, spaces popping on #bitmap land This is Bitcoin's metaverse quietly stacking holders while everything else it's Bitcoin real estate that keeps expanding

@blockamoto @sdongjini Hey moto! I heard something interesting happening in 16739.bitmap , do you know?

BITMAP SIGNAL THEORY for HOODS and SECTORS At block 945,000, counting begins. Hood → Seats (2016 blocks) Sector → Elect + Capital (210,000 blocks) At difficulty adjustments, we count. At halvings, we score. ordinals.com/inscription/d9…

Wow! One guy did this! The first native on the Bitcoin network by $bitmap !

@zhaocaimao_btc 嘿 长文是怎么发的

Regardless of the motivation, our lives are "seen" and "valued," which is much warmer than the indifference of "no one looks back at us" in Hypothesis 2. The "laws of physics" of reality might be benevolently designed Simulators can choose to make physical constants, evolutionary paths, pain thresholds, etc., more habitable. If we discover the universe seems "fine-tuned" for life, this might not be a coincidence, but a design. Pain, illness, and death might be limited to necessary ranges, rather than infinitely cruel. Potential "exit mechanisms" or higher-level access Some speculate: if we develop sufficient technology, we might "wake up," contact the simulators, or even upgrade to a higher-level reality. This gives humanity an exciting goal for the future—not endless expansion, but "graduation" or "enlightenment." If Hypothesis 3 is true, it means the universe is likely filled with successful, powerful, creative civilizations; our existence is designed, observed, and integrated into a larger picture; the prospects for technological immortality and consciousness continuation are bright; and even death might not be the end. In comparison, the first is complete failure, the second is an "empty victory of winning but losing the soul." The third is the most hopeful, most inspiring, and most aligned with humanity's desire for "greater meaning." So, if forced to choose one of these three mutually exclusive hypotheses, I would unhesitatingly choose the third. It is not just "not that bad," but a truly beautiful possibility. "We live in a virtual world" is indeed the most beautiful possibility derived from the reasoning.

"We Humans Are Living in a Virtual World" Is Actually the Best Possible Outcome Here are three mutually exclusive hypotheses: All civilizations capable of developing advanced technology go extinct; They do not go extinct, but none of them wish to create virtual worlds; It is almost certain that we (humans) are living in a virtual world. These three mutually exclusive hypotheses originate from the famous "Simulation Argument" proposed by philosopher Nick Bostrom in his 2003 paper "Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?". The interesting point about these three hypotheses is that the first and second are mutually exclusive, indicating that one of them must be true. If Hypothesis 1 is true, then the inevitable end for humanity is extinction. If Hypothesis 2 is true, then humanity's future will be extremely bleak. This implies that the post-human future is extremely dull or monotonous: a super-civilization capable of easily running countless high-fidelity ancestor simulations, yet almost universally choosing not to do so, suggests that their motivations, values, and interests are extremely narrow and impoverished. They might: Completely abandon the obviously highly attractive activity of "simulating ancestors" for entertainment, historical research, or artistic creation; Enter some form of extreme inward state (such as uploading consciousness and collectively immersing in personal blissful experiences, ignoring the external world); Or their values become completely incomprehensible and indifferent. This is equivalent to saying: human civilization has struggled through all risks to reach the peak of technology, only to become a "super boring," "super involutionary," and "super ascetic" existence. For many people, this is even more disappointing than direct extinction—at least extinction is tragic, whereas this kind of future is "living too long but losing all curiosity and vitality." Therefore, the results of Hypothesis 1 or 2 being true are both chilling. If humanity's future is not one of these two possibilities, then it inevitably leads to Hypothesis 3 being true. Surprisingly, this is the choice that makes people feel most relieved. The third hypothesis, "we are almost certainly living in a virtual world/computer simulation," is indeed the most attractive, most "optimistic," and even the most exciting outcome. In comparison, the first (extinction) is a tragedy, the second (post-human civilization being super boring and completely losing curiosity) is a form of existential emptiness, while the third brings many positive implications and possibilities. Because: Advanced civilizations are widespread and highly developed To run a large number of high-fidelity ancestor simulations, there must be many civilizations that have successfully passed through all existential risks and reached the post-human stage. This means the "Great Filter" is likely behind us (already passed), and the universe is filled with enduring, powerful civilizations. This directly alleviates the loneliness of the Fermi Paradox—we are not the only intelligent life in the universe, merely part of their creation. Technological immortality and consciousness continuation become more credible If our reality can be perfectly simulated, then consciousness is likely computable. This means future consciousness uploading, digital immortality, and self-backup are more realistic. Death might just be the end of "this layer of simulation," not an absolute endpoint. Our existence has "meaning" and "is being observed" We are not brief accidental sparks in the universe, but objects intentionally created and operated by a higher-level civilization. They might be: Studying ancestral history; Conducting ethical/social experiments; Providing entertainment or artistic experiences; Or even out of compassion, allowing us to experience complete lives.

@Zen_of_Nemesis @zuozizhen cool

@zuozizhen 短视频预测下一个视频，LLM可是预测你最爱的下一个字符啊😄

@AlchainHust 所以注意力方案可能是最优解，AI进展到现在，人类造出的最完美方案可能是人类自己。

@ordinalswallet @blockamoto Congrats

WE ARE SO FUCKING BACK

You’re being too shortsighted. If you just try to compete with that bot, you’ll quickly realize it’s not that there’s no competition — it’s that you can’t beat it. So stop being jealous of how cheaply the bot acquires new bitmaps. As long as you’re willing to invest more cost and effort, the “no competition” situation you mentioned simply wouldn’t exist. Also, the current market environment is exactly when the cost is at its lowest. Insisting on separating old and new transactions is just burying your head in the sand. Have you ever seen Bitcoin holders demand that old and new bitcoins be traded separately? Why don’t you go envy those people who started mining Bitcoin on day one? Back then, the cost to mine one Bitcoin was just a few cents, and now buying one BTC costs tens of thousands or even over a hundred thousand USD — isn’t that an even bigger “unfairness”?

@smolbmp But it now has a monopoly over the new fresh mints of Bitmaps which, in absence of any competition, is really dragging the floor down to the inscription cost which at the moment is just few cents. Only option to get out of this is pre and post blockout traded separately.

Bitmap has no team to rug you. No founder who can vanish with the treasury. No centralized infrastructure to shut down. No insider allocation waiting to dump on you. When will you realize that Bitmap may be one of the most important discoveries in crypto?

@Fizzdadong1 Bitmap has no centralized team.

@patoshi_bitmap Wasn't this applied for by the project team?

The new interface is a real eye-opener.

@ordinalswallet @bitcoinmxtt Wow looks great.

Today, we are excited to announce a new Open Source tool – The Bitmap Renderer With Magic Eden going down, we needed a new source of truth for Bitmap block transaction images. We decided to build it and Open Source it for the community. Access the tool and help us build at: github.com/ordinals-walle…

@bitfool1 NIO ES8

有哪一辆车？ 是你开了几年，或者几万公里后 你还坚定的认为这是一辆好车 分享在评论区，谈谈用车感受

@bitmapsocial I like this orange one.

sharing longer term vision for this. disclaimer: you gonna love the explore ui for the bitmap marketplace. coming back to longer term vision. If you hold x% of bitmap with portfolio spread among different types of bitmaps, not just only post 800k bitmaps (to mitigate bots)

@CuiMao 可惜百度和吉利合作造车的集度已经嘎了啊