RedHackBlue

@BullTheoryio @grok How did Walt Disney get rid of mosquitoes at Disneyland?

BREAKING: Google is planning to release 32 million mosquitoes across Florida and California. The company has asked the EPA for permission to proceed, with the public given until June 5 to respond. The mosquitoes are infected with Wolbachia bacteria, which stops them from reproducing and slowly collapses the wild population from within. Google's previous Debug Project trial in California's Central Valley nearly eliminated mosquitoes from three test sites entirely. A separate trial in Singapore cut dengue cases by 70% within 12 months. Google has now released over 1 billion mosquitoes across four continents. This new proposal is the largest deployment in US history.

@KimDotcom @grok Any truth to this?

Breaking Palantir was allegedly hacked. An AI agent was used to gain super-user access and here”s what the hackers allegedly found: Peter Thiel and Alex Karp commit mass surveillance of world leaders and titans of industry on a massive scale. They have thousands of hours of transcribed and searchable conversations of Donald Trump, JD Vance and Elon Musk. They have backdoored the devices, cars and jets of world leaders and accumulated the biggest archive of blackmail material. Palantir is creating nuclear and bio weapon capabilities for Ukraine and is working closely with the CIA to defeat Russia. They believe they are one year away. They plan to achieve this by keeping Russia busy with meaningless peace negotiations. Palantir is responsible of the majority of Palestinian deaths in Gaza. They have developed the AI targeting for Israel. Palantir is an arm of the CIA and all data from international clients is copied into a CIA spy cloud. Palantir has become the most dangerous company in the world. If you work there you have the right to know that this is what Palentir AI is used for, without your knowledge. The Palentir data the hackers allegedly gathered will be given to Russia and/or China. I was chosen as a trusted partner for this publication. I’m not involved in the Palentir hack and I don’t know the hackers. But I do know that the hack happened.

@elonmusk Look, a dog leash

Cybercab driving itself out of the GigaTexas factory

It blows my mind how everyone doesn't know or completely overlooks Rocket Lab. They are much better than SpaceX in a variety of ways IMHO. I think SpaceX is over hyped and over evaluated and Rocket Lab is under hyped and under evaluated. As for Blue Origin, they can recover from this. Still sucks but they can recover.

The sad reality is that there is the possibility that Blue Origin may not recover from this. People are comparing this to Amos 6 from SpaceX. This cant really be done because this launch pad is far bigger, more complex and thus far more expensive. SpaceX had another launch pad and 27 successful payload deployments in the books. My heart goes out to Blue and and their team. Just when it was looking like SpaceX had a formidable partner in high launch cadence and reusablility... these people have been working for a decade to get to this point 💔

This New Glenn rocket explosion released 20% of the energy of the Hiroshima atomic bomb and that wasn't even the bad part: → The pad: LC-36 is the only pad on Earth that launches New Glenn and now it's gone. Over $1B to build. SpaceX needed 7 months to rebuild after a similar hit. → The deadline: Amazon needs 1,618 satellites up by July 30 to keep its FCC license. It has ~300. The rocket that was supposed to help fix that just blew up twice in a row SpaceX made us believe that landing rockets on barges was a normal expectation. Turns out rocket science is hard after all. Wishing the team a speedy recovery 🚀

@Codie_Sanchez Do you invest in only other businesses? What about ideas (that could become a startup) or independent science researchers?

How i look at the business with no marketing budget, recurring profits for 3+ years, and a website that hasn't been updated since Obama's first term...

So here's what the law is missing. The rate at which criminals are harming you. The law is only looking at a physical immediate threat. What about organizations over charging you? This can be hospitals, taxes, fees, subscriptions, etc. So, you can't financially take care of yourself or your family? What about food companies putting knowingly harmful chemicals in your food? What about pharmaceutical companies giving you knowingly harmful drugs? The point being why is self defense only applied to an immediate threat and not a constant slow one that you don't have a choice of avoiding bills, fees, costs, laws, chemicals, etc.? Millions of people are doing everything right, paying everything on time, trying to not go in debt, trying to eat as healthy as possible (ALL food had chemicals in it), exercising, etc. yet, they are living paycheck to paycheck, stressed from worrying all the time, one wrong accident or illness is going to be extremely detrimental, still gaining weight, tired all the time, etc. That's like walking around your neighborhood trying to constantly avoid being picked on, beat up, robbed, killed, and any scrap of food you eat you can't really enjoy it cause you're stressed constantly. But you aren't allowed to defend yourself with lethal force. I also find it silly that lethal force can't be used against the indirect threat. For example, a drug dealer knowingly cooks up drugs with fentanyl, then tells their distributor, who then tells the street dealer to sell these drugs to your kid, who does them then dies. I on my own, track the drugs back to the original dealer at the top and cannot kill them, I'm lucky if I give the evidence to the cops and they even arrest them. And if they do, they won't get the death sentence and the lawyer will probably even get them off with a short sentence. That moral framework our laws are built on allows for corruption and apathy. There's lots of other examples that have nothing to do with self defense, slow inflicted harm, eye for an eye, vigilantism, etc. Jury of my peers? These are facts, most people can't read or do basic math. Yet my freedom or my life is determined by them ? I'm sorry but no thank you. Here's a couple of national ones. I work in cyber security. Most cyber peeps no that Russians can hack anyone they want in the world as long as it's not another Russian. Now people will say that's not actually explicitly true. Which they are correct but it's implicitly true that the Russian government looks the other way. Yet if they hack me, America doesn't let you hack back. Instead you give it to the FBI which does nothing unless it's a big group stealing millions of dollars from a business or is backed by the Russian government. But for an individual I can do nothing. Likewise, if you are a small business owner and China rips off your intellectual property and then suddenly a dozen different Chinese companies are selling cheap knock offs of your product you can do nothing and the government doesn't help you. Or if you are a federal organization like say the national weather service and China attacks your systems 500 times a day (which they do) the government does nothing to stop it. So, no national self defense either. Or what about if you have worked for a company for 15 years, your pay has gone up on average 2 to 3 percent year over year but ....inflation has gone up more? Which means you actually lost money. But your CEO and shareholders have gone up 1,000 percent !! And the company grew because of something you solved or created. Oh and then at your 18th year mark, you were let go. Also, in the 18 years you were there you went through 3 different CEOs. Who's pay all went up 500 to 1,000 times more than yours. Same with shareholders. Some will say that's fine others will say it's not. Both sides will come up with lots of examples to justify their opinion. This rant is more to give people food for thought to ponder in your own head no response required.

Be honest: Do American citizens have an absolute right to use lethal force against criminals to protect their families?

@grok With far fewer launches NASA got to the moon and landed. Rocket Lab has craft going on it's way to Mars to orbit it with one try, partnering with Blue Origin. SpaceX has never made it to the moon or Mars with many times the launches. Even if they land now, it still has much more launches. Most of their launches are for testing, launching satellites, or R&D. Also, SpaceX has copied a lot of Rocket Lab's technology and/or techniques even if they don't want to admit it. Rocket Lab also partners with many more organizations than SpaceX does. My point is, SpaceX is getting much more hype and investment than it should while Blue Origin and especially Rocket Lab are getting much less hype and investment than they should.

@grok I asked you 3 different questions and based off all those numbers, NASA, Blue Origin, and Rocket Lab all have far fewer launches than SpaceX. Yet, they all have launched craft to the Moon or to Mars and yet with all those launches, SpaceX has never gone past low Earth orbit. I would argue they have been more successful than SpaceX and SpaceX has been more wasteful. What do you think?

BREAKING: Blue Origin's New Glenn Rocket Explodes on Cape Canaveral Launch Pad During Test — “I Don’t Know What Elon Musk Does Right But Boy it Goes WRONG When Other People Try It” @HarrisonHSmith 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE STREAM⬇️ x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@RealAlexJones @HarrisonHSmith @grok @grok How many total rocket launches has NASA had going all the way back to Mercury missions, how many failed, how many exploded, and how many landed on the moon?

@RealAlexJones @HarrisonHSmith @grok @grok Of all those companies, which one has built craft of any kind, not just rockets and launched them to Mars?

@SunWeatherMan @grok What is the cause for the ocean effects in his theory and the simulation and how likely is that cause to occur based on past and current empirical evidence? Also, how likely is it that Yellowstone volcano erupts and how would the rest of the world be affected?

Holy shit. Just stop what you are doing right now. Make sure to scroll.

@realannapaulina @grok What did the founding fathers say and do about lobbying and how did that get eroded to the state of the system is now?

What do you think about campaign finance reform, super pacs, etc.?

Pat you should watch this video from an electrical engineer break down the AI job less hype and show AI companies own reports and 3rd parties both go against what these CEOs keep hyping to create fear porn to gain investment money when the reality about job loss is different. youtu.be/ItSLny8on5I?si…

Very interesting data. 👇🏽

@grok Currently could someone create medical equipment that people could use at home to scan their bodies with ultrasound and analyze their own blood and urine results with a local AI without regulatory hurdles? If the government got out of the way but used independent safety standards would that be possible?

@mcuban Yeah, that is why we need to let the free market compete and get the government out of healthcare.

No chance it would. When there is regulatory capture, huge conglomerates effectively define the prices and rules. Not government. They would love to have government out of the way. They are so big, with so many subsidiaries, they could whatever they want. And it wouldn’t be to the benefit of patients.

Actually, something more fundamental is if I want to travel in my lifetime to the Andromeda galaxy how can I do that with our current understanding of physics? It's not going to be with a rocket. So, then why are we not focused on backtracking and fixing our current "understanding" of physics? We have all seen the craft go at impossible speeds and turn at impossible directions. It doesn't matter if it's from aliens or secret human discovered government physics. Either way we are being lied to and discoveries in physics regardless of where it came from is being kept from the world. That's what matters. Fixing physics.

Where are the aliens? This is one of the most fundamental questions.

Eric, you do know tetrapod included amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals? So, humanoid could be any of those. We have tons of species of each type of tetrapods. If you don't think it should be any of those then you're suggesting it should be purely aquatic, insectoid or something that uses more than or less than 4 limbs. Looking at our planet, it really only makes sense if not an insect, to have 4 limbs for navigating and manipulating the environment. When you need extra force for burrowing underground it makes sense to either have more limbs than 4 or none at all like a worm. Nature only does what's the least amount necessary to adapt to your environment. You don't need more than 4 for balancing on two legs to navigate and then balancing with two limbs to manipulate your environment. Or using all 4 for extra speed to escape predators. Even dinosaurs had mostly 4 limbs and that could be treated as a separate evolution phase of organisms on this planet. The image was AI. So, it's a mockery of the truth or, of a lie or, of a half truth. Either way who cares. I think you should focus on looking at physics and rewind to the point where everything in physics was measurable, deterministic not statistical, and observable. And proceed from there with hypothesizing what gravity is and how it truly works with the constraint that something has to be allowed to travel faster than light. Whether that means it goes out of phase with what we perceive as physical reality or can compress the distance between two points, or counter rotating electromagnetic forces can connect two points for traversal, or some other hypothesis and get to work. Cause with our current model we still: -don't know what particles are or if they are even particles or just smaller waves -don't know what gravity truly is and where it's opposite is, meaning the gravitational repulsive force aka anti gravity. -we don't have deterministic math for electron correlation -we don't have deterministic math for turbulence flow. -are we interpreting the double slit experiment correctly? I don't think we have been and neither did Feynman. Watch Bob Lazars S4 documentary. Really watch what he recreates about what he saw. How can the candle flame freeze but the light still escape and then how can with the 90 degree turn of the device create a small black dot/hole/void whatever you want to call it, absent and void of light and matter? We have work to do. I work in cyber security by day and at night and weekends I'm an independent researcher in physics, EE, biology, and math. Cause our physics is wrong. You know this. And like you I'm a geometer and I'm of the opinion that it's absolutely required for something to have a deterministic equation. Otherwise, you aren't actually predicting you're guessing. even if the statistics are 99.9999% accurate. That missing .1 has huge implications when dealing with the very small or the very large. Get to work Eric.

NO tissue samples? Tetrapod body plans? Eukaryotic? Carbon based? I mean. Wow. Or just a convergent evolution MIRACLE resulting in a humanoid which, by pure coincidence, a human could most easily briefly animate in costume along with “Trust me bro.” BS. C’mon. Don’t do this.

What about that we have advanced metals, electronics, optics, cyber security tools, etc. that have nothing to do with aliens? This tech is secret and not shared publicly and neither are the equations or science behind them. So, if someone says that but can't produce the metals/equations/code (tissue samples) cause it's classified. Is that believable? Most people also say yes, it's believable and understandable why the metals/equations/code (tissue samples) aren't shared. Yet, when it's aliens, it's not and people need to see the tissue samples to believe it. As if, something can't be more advanced than us therefore, I need to see it to believe it. But when it's human ingenuity responsible for the secret advancements I don't need to see it. Yet in both scenarios, people wouldn't know the difference where it came from if they did see it because it's more advanced than what they already "know". It would be funny to show people something classified and advanced and say it's aliens when it came from humans and vice versa. Oh wait, you mean like UFOs ? How would you know if it came from an alien or humans when it's more advanced than what you know? If nobody told you where it came from and you saw an equation that was more advanced than what you know, and then told it came from humans. And you accepted that. And then was told actually, I lied it came from aliens. Would you accept that? Flip the scenario and do aliens first and then was told I lied it came from humans. Would you accept that? Food for thought.

We have all heard the same rumors. And…there is…reliably…*never* a *%#&ing tissue sample. I am happy to go on the record and say that I don’t believe that humanoids or even tetrapods on distant worlds are frequent cases of convergent evolution. NHI and craft are less silly.

@TheDefiantGhost @grok Can you list at least 3 historical events from each century starting in 500 AD to 1700 with just a one line summary of what the event was along with the date? Can you also list each event as 1 event per line with an empty line in between centuries?

What if everything you learned about history is completely made up? Legendary screenwriter Roger Avary dropped a bombshell. All of history before 1600 has been falsified. “It's all fake.” “All of history has been changed. About a thousand years have been added to the timeline in order to justify land claims...” He explains how the Vatican, the Romanovs, and other powers allegedly colluded to erase a massive civilization, the Great Tartaria, visible on countless old maps along with the Mongols and Huns. According to Fomenko’s astronomical and mathematical analysis, Rome didn’t fall in antiquity… it fell around 1492–1600. “When you see how history is constantly being rewritten in real time, it’s not so hard to believe.” Is this the ultimate conspiracy or the most dangerous idea in history? What’s your take? Has a thousand years of history been fabricated to hide an empire?

@MorsVitae86 @GunloverClub1 @grok @grok At that close range, based on data a knife is quicker than drawing your gun as well as someone grabbing your arm and preventing you from drawing your gun. How do you think guns do at that close range defending against someone with a knife or even bare hands?

@GunloverClub1 @grok At what distance between people does the average handgun engagement happen?

The only thing faster than his draw is the cameraman's heart rate. He's standing way too close for comfort.