piston broke

I've just been attacked by both Polanski and Corbyn over my calls to implement a hostile environment for illegal migrants - what a duo. @ZackPolanski says I should be 'absolutely condemned', calling it 'nasty' and 'cruel'. @jeremycorbyn says it's 'utterly repulsive'. Okay lads, if you say so. I am very much of the view that allowing hundreds of thousands of unvetted young men from cultures that actively hate women, and us, to roam our streets is absolutely mental. Do I think that placing unchecked Eritrean and Afghan men in communities all around the country is a good idea? Funding their hotels and pocket money? No. No I do not. Would I make life so uncomfortable for these illegals that they chose to leave themselves, before they were forcibly turfed out? Yes. Yes I do. I stand by every word I said. Implement the hostile environment - stop the benefits, stop the boats. Force the illegals to leave. Mass deportations. It's the only way.

@Kristinartz Roy

My son was just born and I want a name with 3 letters, I haven't found any.

@cutiieepie6 @TheTopCatTony1 Yes, the only way these kids and parents learn is by watching them squirm in court.

I am literally shaking. Some teenager threw a rock off an overpass and did this to my truck. I caught him, and his dad had the nerve to say, "He’s just a kid being a kid, I’ll give you $50 for the 'inconvenience'." $50?? This is a specialized windshield with sensors! He told me I was "ruining a child’s future" by calling the police. I feel like he’s raising a criminal and expects me to pay for it. Do I press full charges?

The Record Is Missing. The File Is Hidden. The Vetting Found Something Worse. Three things emerged from Thursday's committee testimony that have not yet received the attention they deserve. Taken together they do not merely damage Keir Starmer's position. They suggest that what has been disclosed so far is not the whole story. Start with the missing record. Cat Little, the most senior civil servant in the Cabinet Office, told the Foreign Affairs Committee that she would expect to see a formal record of the meeting at which the Prime Minister decided to appoint Peter Mandelson. No such record has been found. In British government, decisions of this magnitude are minuted. They are documented precisely so that accountability is possible. The absence of a formal record of the most consequential ambassadorial appointment in a generation is not a filing oversight. It is either a governance failure of staggering proportions or a decision that was deliberately kept off the formal record. Cat Little did not say which. She did not need to. Then there is the vetting file. Little was asked directly whether the security vetting contained anything beyond what was in the due diligence report. She began to answer and stopped herself, saying she could not respond without revealing something. Emily Thornberry pressed her. Was there something in the vetting that was different, more worrying, of more impact than the due diligence? Little declined to confirm directly but made clear the vetting could contain more information by the nature of the exercise. The due diligence report flagged Russia, China and Epstein. If the vetting found something beyond that, something serious enough that the Cabinet Office's most senior official would not discuss it in open committee, the question of what Mandelson was granted Strap Three clearance despite knowing is considerably more serious than anything yet made public. And then there is the most extraordinary detail of all. In March, Little asked Robbins to hand over the vetting summary document and the audit trail around the decision. Robbins refused. A sacked civil servant, already the subject of a bitter public dispute with Downing Street, declined to hand the Cabinet Office chief the documents she needed to brief the Prime Minister and comply with Parliament's Humble Address. Those documents are still not in the public domain. The information that would answer the central question of this entire affair, what the security services actually found and on what grounds the Foreign Office overrode it, is being withheld. Starmer's response to all of this has been to accuse his political opponents of making any allegation they can. That framing requires the country to disbelieve Cat Little, who contradicted his account twice in a single morning. It requires the country to disbelieve Robbins, whose sworn testimony directly contradicts Starmer's selective quotation at PMQs. It requires the country to believe that the absence of a formal record of the appointment decision is normal. And it requires the country to accept that whatever the vetting found, beyond the Russia and China concerns already documented, is simply none of Parliament's business. Karl Turner, a suspended Labour MP, has written to the Speaker urging a privileges committee referral. A senior government source has told journalists that the wheels have stopped turning and the question is no longer whether things can go on but when people move. That is not the language of a government managing a crisis. It is the language of a government that knows the crisis is no longer manageable. The record is missing.The file is hidden. The vetting found something worse than what has been disclosed. And a Prime Minister who calls that a political allegation is a man who has run out of road. "Little asked Robbins to hand over the vetting summary document and the audit trail around the decision. Robbins refused."

🤭

@80s_Kidz We used to have Alpine and Corona

Who remembers the Alpine pop man?

Retweeeeeeeeeeeeeeet

@Scarletmarc Oh yes please 🙏

F&ggots, Peas, Chips and Gravy ❤️ Yes or No 🤔

@unusual_cars Aston Martin Lagonda

Can you tell us what this car is?

@JackieD86388657 @NZblanc Actually, I'd bet this arsehole, Starmer, doesn't even have a pulse..

Starmer should be made to take a lie detector test

@SweetTexanRose Living proof that boarding school doesn’t work.

What’s the first thing that comes to your mind when you see King Charles? I have so many thoughts, I can’t narrow it down to one.

@WeAreProvoco Fantastic news Jane. Xx

Hey everyone! I'm still out so I'll reply to you all later but I'VE BEEN DISCHARGED FROM THE BREAST CANCER CLINIC! My five year's clear really is a milestone for me! 🎀🙏🏻🎉🎊🍷🎈🥂🍾 off to celebrate 🥳 🎀

I don’t understand why so much rubbish is being put into our food nowadays. It’s pretty scary once you start looking on the back & read the ingredients that are going into our food. Why can’t we just go back to natural.

@BLAIMGame Dear god, what a terrible dilemma

Can Angela Rayner save the Labour Party?

@WeAreProvoco Good luck Jane xx

Right, folks. Good morning everyone. I'm not stopping as I'm off to the hospital for my five year breast check up. It's a 'milestone' year so fingers crossed 🤞🏻, eh? I'm trying not to stress about it but these annual checkups always have me tied up in knots! Hope you all have a lovely day. Lots of love ❤️

@CentralReserva9 He’s running scared! He knows his time is up, and it’s all his own doing . The most corrupt, characterless, wooden man, and the worst PM we have ever had to endure. He won’t even fall on his sword gracefully because he’s a traitor and a coward.

The reason any PM prorogues Parliament is to shut down PMQT to avoid scrutiny It doesnt require a vote from MPs & Parliament cannot meet, debate or vote. Starmer alone has shut down any questions on rent boys trial & Mandleson when he was the biggest critic of Boris in 2019

@oelma__ Nice collection

First thought when you see this?

@ronsterd89 Baked beans

What can you add to a grilled cheese sandwich to make it even better?

Is it possible that Starmer is refusing to go because there are legal restrictions in place to restrict discussion of his private life which cease to be applied when he leaves office? I wonder if @SBarrettBar has any thoughts on this?