shaunmac
873 posts

shaunmac 리트윗함

Well, you can’t get more self-sufficient than this! This is right up my alley!
This is from an organization called Open Source Ecology.
From their website:
“Equipment too expensive? Build your own.
Don't know how?
We've already published the schematics, guides and everything else you'd need to build many of the 50 machines needed to build civilisation.
Now we are using the same open source philosophy that helped us build these machines to construct houses in 5 days.
We hope to solve the housing crisis and train people across the world how to build these homes for themselves or for others.”
Here is their website:
learn.opensourceecology.org.
Credit: OpenSourceEcology (IG) instagram.com/reel/DPTpHWzjM…
English
shaunmac 리트윗함

@amtvmedia You focus on the problem and it gets worse. Post solution, maybe we have a chance. Post this shit again and I'll block your content. Post about real fucking solutions and I'll follow you channel.
English
shaunmac 리트윗함

@CuriosityonX A financial system that rewards psychopathy and narcissism. No other species that I know of uses money, and since there's so much success in bio-mimicry as of late. Why not use it for the management of resources?
English

@ElofsonJess Chair force here, did my 4 and gtfo. As I saw how they treated the old guys. I'm grateful to my friends who stayed in.
English

Our corrupt government is not here to help any of us.
We make things better by being the change we want to see.
If each one of us helps only one person that saves 2 of us.
Death will come for us all one day, it's ok to talk about death and tragedy. Sometimes that's all we need is just to talk about it.
That's the best I got
Good luck to you all
Long Live The Republic
English

@liam_out_loud This is like the equal and opposite reaction to Abby Chatfield
English
shaunmac 리트윗함

@cafelockedout Sorry but it makes perfect sense when you know how a monetary system works. If I go to a doctor and he says I need my kidney out. How do I know I really do need my kidney removed, or he just needs to make a payment on his yacht.
English

My rant, as the only non doctor on the show, on hosting a show with these Great doctors who are no longer allowed to work, because of the constrains of AHPRA.
In this extraordinary interview, Dr Charlie Teo is joined by several other dedicated Doctors who have been sacrificed to our Era’s God of Compliance?
English
shaunmac 리트윗함

The #protest that cost #CSLPlamsa and @CSL $90 billion!
#InfectedBloodAustralia protested outside of #CSL’s headquarters in Parkville, Melbourne, Australia two years ago.
CSL knowingly harmed and killed Australian babies, children and adult patients en masse with their #taintedblood treatments.
They also harmed Aussies en masse with their disastrous #AstraZeneca jab which they manufactured here in Australia.
We decided to protest this murderous company CSL two years ago and even held prayers outside of their Annual General Meeting and met with share holders.
Since that time CSL have lost an estimated $90 billion from their market capitalisation.
Be part of making justice happen and purchase a Make #Accountability Happen Again cap here joinhighadventure.com.au/patriot-cap/
Support a Royal Commission of inquiry into the Australian Red Cross/CSL Infected Blood Scandal here infectedbloodaustralia.com/registration
English
shaunmac 리트윗함
shaunmac 리트윗함

#DrJoannaHowe a Professor at Law won’t speak up about thousands of Aussie mums being given #TaintedBlood transfusions but promotes #ShallowChal who has threatened our group with criminal damage.
It’s interesting that Dr Howe stays silent along with people like #PaulineHanson
English
shaunmac 리트윗함

Engineer, Jason Kocher (@i2c_jason), publicly documenting his LENR research in fear of "something happening". I would say recent events have shown this is a valid response.
Video begins with a clip from scientist Amy Eskridge with the exact same warning:
"They will bury you"
I'll put his Instagram in the comments as he hasn't been active on X recently.
English
shaunmac 리트윗함

They do it every single time.
The debate starts with a policy:
Sports.
Prisons.
Changing rooms.
Data collection.
Safeguarding.
Sex-based rights.
And then suddenly we’re no longer talking about the policy.
We’re told we’re debating someone’s existence.
No.
We’re debating a policy.
We’re debating rules.
We’re debating competing rights and competing interests.
Changing the subject from policy to existence is one of the most effective rhetorical tricks in this entire debate because it instantly turns disagreement into cruelty.
The moment someone says:
“Why are you debating my existence?”
Stop them.
Bring it right back.
“No. We’re debating a policy.”
Again.
And again.
And again.
Because if they can convince people that policy disagreement equals denying someone’s existence, they’ve already won the argument without having to defend the policy.
Who’s willing to start calling this out?
Not next year.
Not when it’s convenient.
Now.
Every time it happens.
“No. That’s not what we’re debating.”
Watch how often the conversation changes the moment you refuse to let them switch the subject.
English
shaunmac 리트윗함
shaunmac 리트윗함












