Mick Smith

28.6K posts

Mick Smith banner
Mick Smith

Mick Smith

@smith04_michael

Dad, now a grandad, sports lover. Views expressed are entirely my own fbpe

Northern England 가입일 Temmuz 2014
1.7K 팔로잉1.8K 팔로워
Harry Eccles
Harry Eccles@Heccles94·
No man has done more for the British left that this man. Love and solidarity always @jeremycorbyn
Harry Eccles tweet media
English
301
402
1.9K
18.7K
Steven Swinford
Steven Swinford@Steven_Swinford·
Exclusive from @patrickkmaguire and @oliver_wright * Labour's internal MRP polling is said to be apocalyptic, in the capital and beyond. Labour is on course to lose *every one* of the 50 seats it holds in Sunderland, home to Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary. Most are predicted to go to Reform * London, where all councils are up for election, is expected to be especially challenging. There are fears that the Greens could make significant gains in Camden, where Starmer’s seat is located, as well as Hackney, Lewisham and Lambeth * Labour officials are so concerned by the threat now posed by the Greens in the central London councils they have long won by landslides that they have diverted almost all the party’s campaigning resources to contests in the heart of the capital * One minister said that a bad night in London would be “existential” for ­Labour, given how many of its members were based there. The party leaders are well aware that Labour MPs are holding 59 out of the capital’s 75 parliamentary seats * The minister added that the elections looked set to show that there were “no safe seats” for Labour, adding that they feared it was going to be a “bloodbath”. thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
English
254
755
2.2K
349.3K
Mick Smith 리트윗함
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
If America Leaves NATO, the Bill Lands in Washington “NATO wasn’t there for us. We send billions of dollars to them every year to protect them. We would have always been there for them. But based on their actions, I guess we don’t have to be, do we? Why would we be there for them if they’re not there for us?” That argument sounds airtight. It also gets almost everything backwards. The Industrial Logic No One Wants to Say Out Loud. For decades, NATO membership has functioned as the world’s most effective arms sales platform. When a country joins the alliance, it buys American. F-35s, Patriot batteries, HIMARS, Javelins. It becomes structurally dependent on American spare parts, software updates, and maintenance contracts. It is the most sophisticated captive market in military history. Poland alone devotes 4.7 percent of its GDP to defense. These are not abstract trade figures. They are jobs in Fort Worth, Orlando, and East Hartford. They are the economic foundation of entire congressional districts. A US exit from NATO does not preserve this arrangement. It ends it. Canada and Portugal have already signaled reservations about F-35 commitments worth up to $19 billion, citing political unpredictability in Washington. When two countries walk away from an American platform, others begin running the same calculation. EU member states spent 343 billion euros on defense in 2024, a 19 percent rise from the year before. The political momentum behind “Buy European” is real and growing. The market will remain. NATO gives the United States something no defense budget line can purchase: forward positioning, intelligence integration, and political legitimacy across 30 countries. These are the operating system of American global influence.Without them, the United States becomes alone. The Indo-Pacific pivot is not wrong on its merits. But forward positioning in Europe is not a drain on Pacific readiness. It is the network that makes global power projection coherent. Cut one node and the whole system degrades. The Quiet Withdrawal Already Underway. A formal exit has not happened. But the functional retreat is well advanced. The Trump administration has told European allies the US will no longer serve as NATO’s primary conventional defense provider after 2027. Joint force commands are being transferred to European generals. Intelligence-sharing arrangements built over decades are being quietly renegotiated. Each move is individually defensible. Collectively, they produce the same outcome as a formal withdrawal, without the legal fight or the Senate vote. The irony is considerable. The administration that views NATO as a bad deal for America is dismantling the mechanism that made American arms exports dominant in global defense markets. The alliance was never just a security arrangement. It was the most durable commercial advantage in the history of the defense industry. So back to the question. Why would America be there for allies who aren’t there for America? Because “there for us” included $343 billion in European defense spending flowing toward American suppliers. It included 30 countries hosting American bases and intelligence networks. It included the political architecture that let Washington call itself the leader of the free world and have other governments agree. Not a subsidy to Europe. A return on investment that took 75 years to build. The bill for dismantling it will not arrive in Brussels. It will arrive in Fort Worth.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Stay connected, Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1
English
306
948
2.8K
230.4K
Ricky
Ricky@razorblue·
@smith04_michael @Capt_Fishpaste @TeresaC123 Do you get out much .murders sexual assualts illegals pestering following women hanging around schools a 12 yr old girl latest to be raped foreign crime gangs rife. Tens thousands illegal male migrants they will all soon want women you do know this right .list is huge .
English
1
0
1
105
Michael Graham
Michael Graham@Capt_Fishpaste·
For me, #SAFC are a beacon for what cultural, racial, and religious diversity can achieve and inspire. A white devout Muslim partnering with a black devout Christian to produce the best midfield partnership we've seen at the club in generations ❤️🤍❤️ The very antithesis of what Farage preaches.
Michael Graham tweet media
English
178
117
1.3K
57.4K
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
@smith04_michael @ChablozAlison @ZackPolanski I have no expectation that you believe me or that you will try to confirm if you’re actually right or I am. “Bollocks” is your intellectual level, and that’s a good measure of why we’re in the mess we are.
English
1
0
0
14
Republicans against Trump
Republicans against Trump@RpsAgainstTrump·
Trump: “When I didn't get the Nobel Peace Prize. You gotta understand, I don't care. Norway has lost so credible. I stopped 8 wars… I do it the best. I stopped wars that nobody thought—President Putin called me, he said, 'I can't believe you stopped this one and this one.’”
English
2.9K
1.5K
6.8K
994.9K