Creative Deduction

103.2K posts

Creative Deduction banner
Creative Deduction

Creative Deduction

@CreativeDeduct

Paleolibertarianism. Anarcho-capitalism. Austrian economics. Blog: https://t.co/EW5FBAMXQt Substack: https://t.co/f8gja3K5n2

Considering leaving Britain Katılım Ekim 2016
2.4K Takip Edilen11.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
The west is in great danger of repeating a deadly historical mistake: treating success itself as a crime. In 1929 Stalin launched the policy of “dekulakisation” – the deliberate destruction of the most productive peasants in the Soviet Union. Kulaks were not the richest aristocrats; they were simply the hardest-working, most competent farmers who had managed to create a slightly better life for their families. They were demonised as “class enemies” had their land, tools and livestock confiscated, and were deported, imprisoned or executed. Millions died in the resulting Holodomor famine. The justification was always the same: equality and justice demanded tearing down those who had “too much.” Sound familiar? Today, the political rhetoric has shifted from “kulaks” to “the rich”, “the 1%” and “millionaires and billionaires”. The language is softer, but the underlying sentiment is identical: successful people are portrayed as immoral exploiters whose wealth must be seized for the “common good”. Wealth taxes, windfall taxes and open calls to “eat the rich” are presented as moral imperatives. The lesson from Soviet history is clear. Once a society accepts the premise that it is legitimate to destroy a productive class in the name of equality, it doesn’t stop at the very rich. It eventually consumes the merely successful, then the middle class and finally destroys the very wealth creation the country depends on. Envy disguised as justice has a deadly track record. We should recognise it when we see it.
Creative Deduction tweet media
English
18
90
248
10.7K
EliteTigers
EliteTigers@EliteTigers1·
@ElectionMapsUK Correct me if I'm wrong, but 89% in a seat must be pretty much the highest progressive vote share ever? Has anyone got any examples where the right wing vote share was smaller than this? (I'm guessing this is a student ward?)
English
16
1
56
17K
Election Maps UK
Election Maps UK@ElectionMapsUK·
Castle (Lancaster) Council By-Election Result: 🌍 GRN: 70.0% (+4.9) 🌹 LAB: 15.7% (-10.6) ➡️ RFM: 10.9% (New) 🔶 LDM: 3.4% (+0.0) No CON (-5.3) as previous. Green HOLD. Changes w/ 2024.
English
54
157
1.3K
468.8K
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
@TheDesKelly That's not what we voted for. But we always knew there would be downsides as well as upsides. We got sovereignty back, but we have to queue once in a while.
English
0
0
0
13
Des Kelly
Des Kelly@TheDesKelly·
Brexit dividend? Remember? If you voted for that you're a moron. Happy holidays.
Des Kelly tweet media
English
540
49
323
40.7K
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
@TheEzMackGaming That's not the point. The point is that if you're unhappy about your finances, make more or spend less. Take responsibility and stop whining.
English
1
0
1
6
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
@PolitlcsUK @Telegraph This will make one of the most progressive tax codes in the world even more progressive. Not sure that is what we need.
English
0
0
2
396
Politics UK
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK·
🚨 NEW: Nigel Farage has pledged to scrap income tax on overtime above 40 hours a week for anyone earning under £75,000 [@Telegraph]
English
307
271
3.4K
281.9K
Creative Deduction retweetledi
The Chicago Thinker
The Chicago Thinker@ThinkerChicago·
UChicago Professor Harald Uhlig on his upbringing in Germany and why capitalism is the best economic system Watch it here👇
English
0
1
6
326
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
@MetamateDaz He does pay his fair share. But he's it trying hard to pay as much tax as possible. I don't either. I don't k now if you do...?
English
0
0
0
57
daz
daz@MetamateDaz·
Jeff Bezos capped his salary at $82,000. Not because he's modest or because he wanted what's best for society and his company but because salaries are taxed. Instead, he borrows against his $230 BILLION stock to fund his lifestyle UNTAXED No paycheck = no income tax. The he jumps on TV and said he pays his fair share of taxes. They think we're stupid.
English
295
1.4K
5.1K
100.5K
Creative Deduction retweetledi
Daniel Lacalle
Daniel Lacalle@dlacalle_IA·
Germany is the perfect example of a predatorial state. Like France. The public sector constantly expands, while insane regulation and taxation devour the productive sector and uncontrolled immigration demolishes the social fabric. All are tools of the predatory state that does not aim for progress but only wants control, as I explain in The New Global Economic Order amazon.com/New-Global-Eco…
English
5
108
566
31.5K
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
@james_e_b_ Are Gen Xers actually saying that, or are they merely saying that going to a restaurant for lunch was a rare treat 30 years ago?
English
0
0
0
11
anonymous historian and hat collector
Why are there all these Gen Xers announcing that when we were kids we could only afford McDonald's once a year? It's bollocks
English
103
1
62
7.5K
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
@TheGriftReport I'm not sure... I know this is advertising, not presenting, but I don't see why it would be fundamentally different.
Creative Deduction tweet media
English
0
1
11
159
Grifty
Grifty@TheGriftReport·
Black TV Presenter says she "can never win" Scarlette Douglas says she has to “work twice as hard because I’m wanted twice as less” as a black woman in TV. The 39-year-old A Place in the Sun presenter told the Daily Mail she feels she can “never win” in the industry. She said: “I’ve always felt that I’ve walked into a room, and instantly, there’s that kind of air of, ‘oh, they’re not gonna be that good’… I have to work twice as hard because I’m wanted twice as less.” Scarlette, who also appeared on I’m A Celebrity in 2022, added that black women are judged far more harshly than other minorities when they speak up labelled “angry black woman” with a “chip on her shoulder,” while similar behaviour from others is seen as “fiery.” She says using her platform to call out unconscious bias is necessary “to make a positive change,” even though she used to be too scared to speak out. Thoughts?
Grifty tweet media
English
808
23
137
37.6K
Raven
Raven@raven_brah·
Boomers seem to forget that fast food used to be a normal, everyday expense for them because it was affordable. You could get a burger easily on minimum wage, it wasn’t some fancy treat you had once a year as a reward for pulling yourself up by your bootstraps.
English
3.7K
91
1.6K
2.3M
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
@GilesUdy I’ve read quite a bit about the Webbs and their preposterous book about Stalin’s USSR. But didn’t quite know how far the rot went into the Labour Party.
English
1
0
0
18
Giles Udy
Giles Udy@GilesUdy·
@CreativeDeduct on my website as it went out of print. I got a 2nd edn did me myself. It was the norm for the party. They only woke up to Stalin around 1938 but which time his extermination of all the Bolsheviks they also admired was getting obvious even to them.
English
1
0
2
22
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
The west is in great danger of repeating a deadly historical mistake: treating success itself as a crime. In 1929 Stalin launched the policy of “dekulakisation” – the deliberate destruction of the most productive peasants in the Soviet Union. Kulaks were not the richest aristocrats; they were simply the hardest-working, most competent farmers who had managed to create a slightly better life for their families. They were demonised as “class enemies” had their land, tools and livestock confiscated, and were deported, imprisoned or executed. Millions died in the resulting Holodomor famine. The justification was always the same: equality and justice demanded tearing down those who had “too much.” Sound familiar? Today, the political rhetoric has shifted from “kulaks” to “the rich”, “the 1%” and “millionaires and billionaires”. The language is softer, but the underlying sentiment is identical: successful people are portrayed as immoral exploiters whose wealth must be seized for the “common good”. Wealth taxes, windfall taxes and open calls to “eat the rich” are presented as moral imperatives. The lesson from Soviet history is clear. Once a society accepts the premise that it is legitimate to destroy a productive class in the name of equality, it doesn’t stop at the very rich. It eventually consumes the merely successful, then the middle class and finally destroys the very wealth creation the country depends on. Envy disguised as justice has a deadly track record. We should recognise it when we see it.
Creative Deduction tweet media
English
18
90
248
10.7K
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
@TooMuchNoi Well, the Bolsheviks also started by killing the Romanovs. A decade later, you'd get executed for owning two cows.
English
0
0
0
19
Creative Deduction retweetledi
Charles Burns
Charles Burns@Charles97894986·
The collectivist approach..
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct

The west is in great danger of repeating a deadly historical mistake: treating success itself as a crime. In 1929 Stalin launched the policy of “dekulakisation” – the deliberate destruction of the most productive peasants in the Soviet Union. Kulaks were not the richest aristocrats; they were simply the hardest-working, most competent farmers who had managed to create a slightly better life for their families. They were demonised as “class enemies” had their land, tools and livestock confiscated, and were deported, imprisoned or executed. Millions died in the resulting Holodomor famine. The justification was always the same: equality and justice demanded tearing down those who had “too much.” Sound familiar? Today, the political rhetoric has shifted from “kulaks” to “the rich”, “the 1%” and “millionaires and billionaires”. The language is softer, but the underlying sentiment is identical: successful people are portrayed as immoral exploiters whose wealth must be seized for the “common good”. Wealth taxes, windfall taxes and open calls to “eat the rich” are presented as moral imperatives. The lesson from Soviet history is clear. Once a society accepts the premise that it is legitimate to destroy a productive class in the name of equality, it doesn’t stop at the very rich. It eventually consumes the merely successful, then the middle class and finally destroys the very wealth creation the country depends on. Envy disguised as justice has a deadly track record. We should recognise it when we see it.

English
0
1
2
115
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
The effect known as Baumol’s cost disease describes how salaries in sectors which has experienced no or low productivity gains still follow the general increase in salaries in the economy as a whole. British public sector wages have largely followed the private sector, increasing steadily in return for no - or even negative - productivity growth. This is what happens when politics replaces market competition: wages become determined by fiat, not economic value creation. The bill is picked up by the long suffering British taxpayer.
Creative Deduction tweet mediaCreative Deduction tweet media
English
1
1
3
133
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
@RebeccaNP We don't need to 'stand' with trans people any more than we need to stand with blonde people or tall people.
English
0
0
2
63
Fermsy 🎒
Fermsy 🎒@Cryptoboyy_Aji·
My boomer dad swears he raised a family of 4 on one salary. So I handed him my grocery receipt. $340. For one week. He looked at it like it was written in a foreign language. Then said “you’re buying the wrong things.” Sir that’s eggs, bread, chicken, milk, and vegetables. The wrong things are apparently just called groceries now.
English
594
170
3.1K
247.2K
jaynemesis
jaynemesis@jaynemesis·
Solar is currently meeting around 45% of the UK's electricity generation demand.
English
131
12
146
15.1K