Amedeor⚡∞ ₿

1.7K posts

Amedeor⚡∞ ₿ banner
Amedeor⚡∞ ₿

Amedeor⚡∞ ₿

@supbtc

Spreading Blockchain, Bitcoin was just the wheel ...

somewhere on Earth 가입일 Haziran 2022
907 팔로잉241 팔로워
고정된 트윗
Grayscale
Grayscale@Grayscale·
who should we be following in crypto right now? we'll follow the most mentioned accounts ⬇️
English
916
50
622
69.6K
BSCN
BSCN@BSCNews·
🚨HUGE: QUANTUM RISK TO $BTC "NEITHER EXISTENTIAL, NOR NOVEL" According to several Bernstein analysts speaking to DLNews, the quantum threat posed to Bitcoin is little more than a required technical upgrade for $BTC. As DLNews wrote, it is "not a death sentence for Bitcoin". The only difference brought about by the recently released Google report is that the changes must be made in the nearer future than was originally thought. This is not the end for Bitcoin! Source: DLNews
English
4
2
29
4.5K
Arshavir 
Arshavir @__wi·
No email account. No password. Just messages tied to you. This looks like email, but isn’t. What would you use it for?📥 #icp #internetidentity
Arshavir  tweet media
English
7
5
46
1.7K
Amedeor⚡∞ ₿
Amedeor⚡∞ ₿@supbtc·
Bottom line: Iran is charging tolls for safe passage in the Strait and accepting non-dollar payments including crypto to evade sanctions. But the claim of a strict Bitcoin requirement is exaggerated—it's more accurate to say yuan or various cryptocurrencies (stablecoins prominent, Bitcoin mentioned in some contexts). Always cross-check sensational crypto headlines against primary sources like Bloomberg for the nuances.
English
0
0
0
18
BSCN
BSCN@BSCNews·
🇮🇷NEW: IRAN TO REQUIRE $BTC FOR STRAIT OF HORMUZ PASSAGE Iran is officially mandating that shipping companies pay transit tolls in Bitcoin for vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz. This policy applies to oil tankers seeking passage during the current two-week ceasefire with the U.S. and is intended to circumvent traditional banking sanctions. By shifting to $BTC, Tehran is establishing a sovereign payment channel that operates entirely outside conventional financial networks and remains resistant to seizure.
English
25
40
181
25.2K
The Bitcoin Historian
The Bitcoin Historian@pete_rizzo_·
ADAM BACK JUST ABSOLUTELY DESTROYED #BITCOIN QUANTUM FUD LIVE ON BLOOMBERG QUANTUM COMPUTERS ARE "EXTREMELY BASIC" WE STILL HAVE "A DECADE" TO PREPARE DON'T BELIEVE THE FUD. HODL 🚀
English
154
686
4.2K
522.1K
Trending Bitcoin
Trending Bitcoin@TrendingBitcoin·
MICHAEL SAYLOR: ''NO ONE HAS EVER LOST MONEY BUYING BITCOIN''
Trending Bitcoin tweet media
English
52
39
398
11.2K
moonshootsol
moonshootsol@moonshootsol·
@supbtc @pete_rizzo_ You do realise that in all likelihood, he is Satoshi Nakamoto, right? Definitely not a fraud. Kind of ironic that you have a BTC logo in your name and call this ma a fraud.
English
1
0
2
52
Amedeor⚡∞ ₿
@Gaiidii @dominic_w Well now you are a liar . It said no twice and the second one I just used the "think harder" option in grok to give you his best answer which confirms the no. Sleep well
English
0
0
1
17
ICP is a scam
ICP is a scam@Gaiidii·
@supbtc @dominic_w According to him, maybe not entirely true. But you prefered to ask him again to get the answer you wanted.
ICP is a scam tweet media
English
1
0
0
46
dom williams.icp ∞
dom williams.icp ∞@dominic_w·
As caffeine.ai transitions to V3, it is now clearer than ever. There is only 1 onchain cloud network: the Internet Computer (ICP). There is no room for debate. After years of relentless R&D, the technology remains completely unmatched. And it's getting better 🔥.
English
71
254
984
18.8K
Unstoppable | Private Wallet
Unstoppable | Private Wallet@unstoppablebyhs·
ADAM BACK IS NOT SATOSHI ADAM BACK IS NOT SATOSHI ADAM BACK IS NOT SATOSHI ADAM BACK IS NOT SATOSHI ADAM BACK IS NOT SATOSHI ADAM BACK IS NOT SATOSHI ADAM BACK IS NOT SATOSHI ADAM BACK IS NOT SATOSHI ADAM BACK IS NOT SATOSHI ADAM BACK IS NOT SATOSHI
English
22
0
41
2.6K
ICP is a scam
ICP is a scam@Gaiidii·
@supbtc @dominic_w use your brain. Create a new sticker, have better benefits for node provider making the node join the new one. and avoid : - exposing you to overregulated blockchain - exposing you to pay for the cost of R&D and all nodes and friends While : giving better alternative to users
English
1
0
0
60
Amedeor⚡∞ ₿
Ok since you insist . Icp is an established protocol so even if AGI copies it . It will speak that protocol and be a tiny part of the icp network . As you may not know . Icp has many blockchains . Each subnet is a blockchain . There is public network and private network (utopia). Your AgI can use cloud engines w money to build a subnet and be part of the ic public network. If it decides let say brand that into a private blockchain and call it "icp is a scam" well no one will go there . Also the NNS governs over all subnets using chain key . So if your subnet is not operating like icp consensus you will be slashed
English
1
0
0
78
ICP is a scam
ICP is a scam@Gaiidii·
@supbtc @dominic_w "Super complex" <-- this is easy to say. Meanwhile Nvidia reached AGI, but its better to ignore this right ? Buying ICP is : - exposing you to overregulated blockchain - exposing you to pay for the cost of R&D and all nodes and friends - not really exposing you to any benefits
English
1
0
0
79
BSCN
BSCN@BSCNews·
🚨BREAKING: ADAM BACK DENIES BEING SATOSHI NAKAMOTO IN RESPONSE TO NYT REPORT Blockstream CEO @adam3us is officially denying he is Satoshi Nakamoto following a New York Times investigation released today. "I’m not Satoshi, but I was early in laser focus on the positive societal implications of cryptography, online privacy and electronic cash." The report compiles evidence from the 1990s Cypherpunk archives to suggest Back’s Hashcash served as the primary blueprint for Bitcoin. Back maintains that while he was a pioneer in electronic cash and privacy tech, he is not the protocol's anonymous creator.
BSCN@BSCNews

🚨JUST IN: ADAM BACK NAMED AS POSSIBLE BITCOIN CREATOR SATOSHI NAKAMOTO After more than a year of investigation, the New York Times has published a report identifying British cryptographer Adam Back as the most likely candidate to be Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto. The paper's evidence spans thousands of decades-old internet postings, computational linguistic analysis, and a timeline of technical contributions. Per reports, Back invented Hashcash, proposed decentralized electronic cash in Cypherpunk emails during the late 1990s, and outlined a node-based network architecture that Satoshi later executed almost identically. He was reportedly everywhere in discussions about digital cash for over a decade and then vanished entirely the moment Bitcoin was born. Back denies all of it.

English
12
6
42
14.5K
Amedeor⚡∞ ₿
@BSCNews He is a fraud . Not satoshi. Worked for epstien to slow down bitcoin and created a profit to provide a layer 2 solution for the problem he created "that failed " . Was one of the causes why bitcoin is not usable as cash
English
0
0
4
995
BSCN
BSCN@BSCNews·
🚨JUST IN: ADAM BACK NAMED AS POSSIBLE BITCOIN CREATOR SATOSHI NAKAMOTO After more than a year of investigation, the New York Times has published a report identifying British cryptographer Adam Back as the most likely candidate to be Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto. The paper's evidence spans thousands of decades-old internet postings, computational linguistic analysis, and a timeline of technical contributions. Per reports, Back invented Hashcash, proposed decentralized electronic cash in Cypherpunk emails during the late 1990s, and outlined a node-based network architecture that Satoshi later executed almost identically. He was reportedly everywhere in discussions about digital cash for over a decade and then vanished entirely the moment Bitcoin was born. Back denies all of it.
English
159
82
590
175.8K
ICP is a scam
ICP is a scam@Gaiidii·
@supbtc @dominic_w divide to reign and suddently nothing is so complex. Also I am saying copying, not creating.
English
1
0
0
162
ICP is a scam
ICP is a scam@Gaiidii·
@dominic_w Honest question : What stops anyone from using AI to just copy ICP code and create a new blockchain sticker ?
English
6
0
1
835