theoverhypedd

@NHarding97 @texpat1307 @MaxwellFrostFL Or it would say to the Office of the Attorney General. Not to the Honorable Pamela Bondi

@NHarding97 @texpat1307 @MaxwellFrostFL It is addressed to her, if it was to the AG. It would have said "To The Acting Attorney General"

If she defies our lawful subpoena, we will move to hold her in contempt of Congress.

@jjh_esq @factpostnews In the court of public opinion, settling, especially in the sexual assault of minor, is pretty damning. I don't think we would want the leader of our country to be of that character.

Well, that is your opinion. Mine is that there is no evidence Trump molested a child. The victims can file charges against anyone they claim did. They won’t because the victims all took settlements and signed NDAs and confidentiality agreements. So this story is merely an attempt by the victims to both keep the money and bring charges. That attempt failed and is going nowhere.

Reporter: Robert Garcia, out with a statement saying that the subpoena is to Pam Bondi whether she is Attorney General or not. She must come in to testify immediately. They are threatening to begin contempt of Congress charges if she does not indeed show up.

@jjh_esq @factpostnews Because they are working on a full cover up. Look, I was pissed that Biden's AG didn't do more, even if most of the documents were sealed due to Maxwell's appeal. But for the AG to not charge her with contempt just further displays the corruption within this admin.

@theoverhypedd @factpostnews No, I expected the AG would file contempt charges if they didn’t testify. The AG will not file charges against the former AG if she does not testify.

@jjh_esq @factpostnews But you expected the Clintons to testify to Republicans.?

No, I pointed out nobody wants to testify ever. Particularly when you know it’s going to be a grueling affair with Democrats grandstanding and women crying. Moreover, tactically, the people claiming there is a coverup have the burden of proof. They can’t meet that burden without testimony. As such, denying them witness testimony prevents them from getting the evidence they must have to bring charges. So, don’t testify unless you are forced to testify.

@jjh_esq @factpostnews You avoided my question and went back to something that we already covered.

Congress doesn’t have the power to do anything. Nobody wants to testify. Who wants to endure that circus of grandstanding Democrats. Plus, I advise clients not to testify all the time. No reason to give your opponent an opportunity. They have the burden of proof. Without evidence, they can’t meet their burden.

@atrupar We have no idea what we are doing because Israel pulled the Uno Reverse and Iran said fuck off here is a Draw Four.

JD Vance: "The president is not gonna abide by our terms if the Iranians are not abiding by their terms ... the president has a lot of options to go back to war"

@jjh_esq @factpostnews If there was nothing to hide, why would she not testify and why would the executive have to rescue her? Her denying to testify only aids in a federal court pushing for testimony under civil enforcement.

@theoverhypedd @factpostnews If there is a new President who instructs his/her AG to prosecute. If not, Congress can’t enforce civil contempt or criminal contempt. And if they try to arrest her for inherent contempt, there is nothing stopping the Executive from rescuing her.

@WHEATNINJA06 @susanlovespups @IAmPoliticsGirl Research growing zones. Then research how that has impacted our cattle herd in the US.

@susanlovespups @IAmPoliticsGirl Get lost omg global warming was supposed to knock us off 20 years ago.

If the bees die, we die. (Google it if you need.) 🥺

@jjh_esq @factpostnews It will move like a glacier, but ultimately she will have to give testimony after years of appeals. By then Trump will be dead, but this is no different than Holder, Barr and so forth.

They can try civil contempt, but it won’t survive appeal. That’s why the one time they attempted it, the House settled before it could be appealed. The House knew it would lose on appeal. All of the stems from the basic principles we learned in grade school civics: Congress passes laws, the Executive “executes” them. Congress can’t enforce civil contempt any more than it can enforce any law. It’s prohibited from doing such by the first sentence of Article II of the US Constitution.

@EdKrassen It is not simply "take Karg". You would be in a forever conflict that would take the lives of soldiers for years to come.

BREAKING: Fox News is reporting that only 2 oil tankers have crossed the Strait of Hormuz, and they are once again talking about having to invade Kharg Island to destroy Iran's oil production. “We do have an ace in the hole. We do have a strategic asset, and that is Kharg Island. We can wait til the very end of our operations and take control of it or destroy it. If we take control of it, we can use it as leverage with the Iranians. 90% of their oil distribution comes from Kharg Island. The first thing we would say to them is, ‘you have to give up all of you nuclear enterprise to us. You have to hand it over — the enriched uranium, what centrifuges you have left.’” So much for the apparently phony ceasefire deal.

@jjh_esq @factpostnews I am not worried about criminal contempt. As I said they would call it contempt of congress. AG would not do anything, then they would go through the path of civil enforcement. Geezus, fucking read.

@theoverhypedd @factpostnews No I didn’t. I proved the House needs the AG for criminal contempt. The House tried civil contempt and a declaratory judgment 1 time and then settled before a trial judge ruling could be overturned on appeal. Don’t believe me? Just wait as nothing will be done to Pam Bondi.

@jjh_esq @factpostnews You literally proved my point. They would use civile enforcement just as the examples I gave you.

@theoverhypedd @factpostnews If you don’t believe an actual lawyer, try Grok: x.com/i/grok/share/0…

@Coovarra @MrGlobal2025 That is fair to say. It would ultimately fall into the ayatollah's hands or who is the current leader based on the hierarchy. Didn't mean Khamenei specifically

@theoverhypedd @MrGlobal2025 That would assume Khamenei is even alive, or not in a coma as has been rumored for weeks. I'm more inclined to agree with Charlie Garcia's Capitol Mischief reporting that the real person in charge of Iran now is IRGC leader Ahmad Vahidi, and he has no reason to want a deal

The administration doesn’t know that the Iranian Security Council has no authority over the Iranian Military.

@jjh_esq @factpostnews I love when cocky people have no understanding of the law and never research.

@jjh_esq @factpostnews You clearly have no understanding of our government. You can just review the Josh Bolten case in 2008 or Eric Holder in 2012 or even Bill Barr and Wilbur Ross.

@jjh_esq @factpostnews Congress can issue a contempt of congress. They can then go to a federal judge, who can then issue a compelling testimony or documents. If she still refuses then it is contempt of court and US Marshalls can take her in. They could use Inherent Contempt as well.

@theoverhypedd @factpostnews Congress does not have the power to bring charges against anyone. That is an executive power. Come on. Take basic civics.

@ThaGinth @ArmaLite15OU812 @RepJasmine I did not call you a cult, but yes people across the globe do call you a cult. Even die hard Republicans call you all a cult.

@theoverhypedd @ArmaLite15OU812 @RepJasmine “People” don’t.. just weirdos like you and we don’t give a fuck what you freaks think or say.

If Pam Bondi thinks that she doesn't have to show up and testify before the House Oversight Committee about her cover-up of the Epstein files just because she got fired — she has another thing coming. We subpoenaed Pam, regardless of her employment status. We expect to see her next week, or she can expect to be held in contempt of Congress. Time is up for these games. The survivors deserve justice, and the American people deserve answers.

@jjh_esq @factpostnews Yes they do. They can go to a federal judge as I said. Look it up.

@theoverhypedd @factpostnews Congress doesn’t have that power.

@KathyNGPGGC Venezuela are just pawns. They have no control. You give them way too much credit.

@theoverhypedd Yes they did, the cartel arm it’s all connected throughout the world via shipping companies and terrorism, human trafficking drugs etc…and maritime regulatory bodies…. Ask the Rothschilds that claim to own your birth certificate.

Says the person who doesn’t have family members who were in Iran in the 1970s unlike myself.