DanT

563 posts

DanT

DanT

@uyintans

가입일 Şubat 2026
25 팔로잉17 팔로워
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@ZackKorman It’s written by a group of people that all wanted their own personal arguments added.
English
1
0
1
118
Zack Korman
Zack Korman@ZackKorman·
Security people are signing an open letter asking the US government to remove the export restrictions on Fable/Mythos. I've read it multiple times and I still don't understand the argument. It seems like it's just a friends-of-Anthropic letter.
Zack Korman tweet media
English
38
15
156
15K
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@colemurray It's for single API requests, not for agent workloads. You can't use this to power OpenCode or something of that nature. At most you can add a "consult an expert" one-shot MCP call.
English
0
0
3
282
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@maattttbrown @SFGate This is an anti-AI protest? College students truly got convinced en masse to be anti-AI?
English
0
0
1
7.9K
Matt Brown
Matt Brown@maattttbrown·
Stanford grads walk out as Google CEO Sundar Pichai takes the stage as commencement speaker. No mention of AI, unlike other uni speakers getting booed down this year. Story for @sfgate shortly
English
2.2K
3.8K
40.8K
10.2M
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@signalxsoul They've likely realized that publicly proving the administration wrong will do nothing to help their situation in this case, and risks further blowback. They likely think they can get past this via favorable political maneuvering and a small fix to lock things down further.
English
1
0
13
1.1K
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
There are enough technically competent people at their disposal to confirm this. Assuming it really was "find security issues in this codebase", this was politically motivated and there wasn't much that Anthropic could do to avoid this outcome. Dario needs to bend the knee to Trump, donate to his interests, all of the things that OpenAI is doing, or else the administration will keep hamstringing them like this.
English
1
0
2
221
Hank Oslo
Hank Oslo@xctlot·
So the "jailbreak" was "find any security issues in this codebase", which led to... finding security issues in the codebase. At some point cabinet level officials with zero technical expertise were convinced this is a "vulnerability". Dario talks down to them about this.
Sophia Cai@SophiaCai99

NEW: Inside the 24-hrs before WH slapped export controls on Anthropic - Last Thursday, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy raised concerns about Fable jailbreak to Trump admin - Friday AM, Sean Cairncross, Bessent, Susie etc. held WH call to discuss - Then White House started reaching out to Anthropic to speak with Dario Amodei, who was at a wellness retreat. - When Amodei was finally available past 1pm, he had three tense phone calls with a combo of ppl including Cairncross, Bessent, Lutnick, Kessler, Will Scharf, Richard Walters, and Walker Barrett. -Amodei tried to clear up what he assumed was a misunderstanding. He defended the guardrails and distinguished between universal and non-universal jailbreak - Cairncross and Bessent were unmoved and asked Amodei to take down Fable and work with the admin to fix the vulnerabilities. (A WH official said Amazon’s findings were run past the NSA and they felt they had “proof.”) - Amodei asked for more time and info, but he made no commitments to pull the model - Bessent told Amodei directly at one point that he was making a “bad decision” - By Friday evening, the Trump admin imposed its export controls. - “Export controls were a last resort after begging them for hours to work with us,” senior WH official said. W/ @cheyennehaslett politico.com/news/2026/06/1…

English
10
3
199
13.3K
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@TheStalwart So in practice, for real work folks are doing these days, routing to cheaper models needs to be done based entirely on the initial prompt (and maintained on the same model), or needs to be a "dispatch cheaper subagents" model supported by the harness/llm itself.
English
0
0
0
15
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@TheStalwart It's actually less relevant for any real work - model routing approaches only work for a single LLM call. You can't run a coding agent and potentially swap models on each request beyond the first, that breaks both caching and intelligence.
English
1
0
1
68
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
1) Most people think it’s a choice between “apartment vs SFH” without considering SFH rentals. The latter isn’t even really possible in some areas due to low rental inventory. 2) People have not gotten the memo about renting being financially better in the long term post-pandemic, if you invest the difference. Or they live in a MCOL area and it’s not as true there.
English
0
0
0
183
Guive Assadi
Guive Assadi@GuiveAssadi·
Why do people care so much about owning a house? It’s generally a better idea to rent, especially in areas with a high price/rent ratio. I don’t understand the emotional pull of home ownership.
English
30
3
56
8.8K
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@uzairansar This is all for single LLM requests. Totally irrelevant for coding work.
English
1
0
4
3.1K
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
Yes! I’ve watched this play out in a large company. The people that vibe code large amounts and stopped reading code months ago are now paying for it with maintenance on awful quality systems. It’s harder, but you can use AI to hugely accelerate the creation of high quality, well architected code too. You just need to read through and give feedback on all changes.
English
1
0
4
677
Jamon
Jamon@jamonholmgren·
For serious software I’m firmly in this camp now. Feels like there’s definitely camps forming.
David Cramer@zeeg

@file_mutex people who dont read the code are not serious people and it takes a serious person to ship production software

English
23
16
640
67.8K
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@zachlloydtweets No one has a great solution. Technical solutions aren't effective at it. The best I've seen is just shaming the top users (who drive the vast majority of cost).
English
0
0
0
130
Zach Lloyd
Zach Lloyd@zachlloydtweets·
How are eng leaders currently tracking and limiting coding agent spend? Model proxies? Provider limits? Is it per user? Per task? Trying to understand the state of the world because I’m hearing a lot more interest in controlling costs these days
English
8
0
18
6.7K
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
People really underestimate the impact of caching in something like Claude Code. 90% of tokens come from cache, and the cache misses when switching models. So the client needs to support intelligently routing to a model and stick with one, this can't be done in the routing layer on a per-request basis.
English
3
0
1
190
Aaron Levie
Aaron Levie@levie·
The layer that can route to the best AI model for the particular job is going to increase in value substantially. There are at least 3 big reasons: * Cost optimization: there are plenty of use cases where you need frontier intelligence for some tasks and something far cheaper for others. Even in the same task you may use frontier intelligence for planning and review of the work, but an OSS or cheaper model for the bulk of the workload. This is going to be standard across large buckets of work going forward. * Capability maximization: despite the bitter lesson and models generally getting better in the same direction, there are still lots of differences between models. Some are better at tool use, others better at coding, and others again better at certain domains of knowledge work. The ability to route between these at different times is a huge advantage. * Risk mitigation: while the Fable situation is somewhat of a black swan, it’s possible we’re heading toward a regulatory environment where governments may restrict models at different times based on their approval mechanisms or new things they discover. This means you’re going to want flexibility in being able to deploy workloads across different providers as a form of risk mitigation. Ultimately, it’s going to increasingly be a a strategic advantage for the applied AI layer that they can effectively route between models. Will be very interesting to see how this evolves.
OpenRouter@OpenRouter

Introducing the Fusion API, the smartest compound model in the market. Fusion achieves Fable-level intelligence at half the price. How it works 👇

English
57
52
550
110.3K
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@GeorgeMayer Preventing models from finding and fixing bugs would break agentic coding
English
0
2
9
1.1K
George Mayer
George Mayer@GeorgeMayer·
Dario refusing to patch seems unlikely or at least underdetailed
David Sacks@DavidSacks

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

English
54
3
366
32.3K
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@levie During all of that back and forth, China will have inevitably stolen the key research insights that led to the model improvements and will be working to implement them in their own models.
English
0
0
2
258
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@MatthewBerman Better margins from their OpenAI contracts?
English
0
0
2
853
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@segyges Trump is just forcing Dario to bend the knee. He will.
English
0
0
1
122
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@antoniogm Medellin has the best weather. Mid-70s truly year round. Not too dry or wet. No one needs heat or air conditioning.
English
0
0
1
227
Antonio García Martínez (agm.eth)
I persist in my belief that SF has the best weather. Summer and winter both suck. I shouldn’t have to design my life around freezing or sweltering. Temps should be between 60 and 70F. You grab a jacket on the way out. That’s it. Life’s too busy to grapple with weather.
Jake@JustJake

Seasons in SF don’t exist in terms of Summer/Winter They exist in boom/bust. A swelling, then a selling, of the city It’s a sight to behold

English
41
4
222
39.8K
DanT
DanT@uyintans·
@petergyang The point is to force Anthropic to remove it until Trump gets whatever bribe or control he prefers
English
3
1
50
4.6K
Peter Yang
Peter Yang@petergyang·
Suspending Fable for all “foreign person inside the US” is wild. How can you even enforce this properly?
English
562
119
4.5K
704.9K
Peter Berezin
Peter Berezin@PeterBerezinBCA·
AI spending is massively skewed toward a small share of power users.
Peter Berezin tweet media
English
68
131
992
235.6K
Egor K.
Egor K.@egorkabantsov·
Name one reason why I should switch from Codex to Claude Code
English
53
1
27
3.3K