Kofi Asare

57K posts

Kofi Asare banner
Kofi Asare

Kofi Asare

@0sahene

In Hoc Signo Vinces

Tamale, Ghana Katılım Haziran 2012
604 Takip Edilen801 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Kofi Asare
Kofi Asare@0sahene·
For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain. Phil. 1:21
English
0
4
4
0
Kofi Asare retweetledi
JoyNews
JoyNews@JoyNewsOnTV·
GN Bank licence restored: The entire banking cleanup was a deliberate attempt by some individuals to rob the country and depositors of their resources. - Dr. Bernard Tutu Boahene, Lecturer in Political Marketing at the University of Education, Winneba youtube.com/live/uCmbSGpk8… #JoyNews | #AMShow
YouTube video
YouTube
English
9
27
183
11.3K
Kofi Asare
Kofi Asare@0sahene·
I want to be the Works and Housing Minister for just 2 years.
English
1
0
0
19
Kofi Asare
Kofi Asare@0sahene·
The people are the real enemies. The leaders are a microcosm of the people. The solution is clear but the people wouldn't like it. We collectively are not ready for development. Sad
First Lady@mayfred__

Isn’t it concerning that we can repost newspaper headlines about flooding in Accra from the 1960s and they would still be relevant today. If the city has been flooding for decades, why has no lasting solution been put in place? Our leaders are enemies of progress fr.

English
0
1
1
14
Kofi Asare retweetledi
Seth Doe Esq
Seth Doe Esq@seth_doe22·
Your point is, you’re enforcing already existing legislations and not a Bill. But as someone with legal knowledge and a legislator too, you definitely know and the courts have cemented into public knowledge that existing legislation can be wrong and can be criticized. NPP v IGP. The IGP was enforcing existing legislation (Public Order Act) to restrict people from embarking on demonstrations without his permit. Supreme Court struck down those provisions. Mensima v Ag. Existing L.I stated that one must be part of a cooperative society to be granted a license to be a local distiller. Court struck down that provision. Martin Kpebu v Ag. Existing legislation that’s the Criminal Procedure Act stated that one cannot be granted bail for certain severe offenses. The Supreme Court over fifty years later struck down that provision. When your response is that you’re just enforcing an existing legislation, any citizen of Ghana who is adversely affected by that legislation can bring an action to strike it down as breaching the constitution or administrative power. Even in the case of Ghana Independent Broadcasters Association v NMC, the court struck down existing regulations that sought to censor and restrict the broadcasting content of independent broadcasters. Infact common sense makes it clear that only existing legislations can be problematic. In the case of Amanda Odoi v Ag as well as Richard Sky v Ag the court held it is not Bills but existing legislation that can be questioned by citizens in the public interest. Ghanaians have a right to question, critique and even challenge existing legislation in court. They don’t have to be IT experts to challenge a law you think only affects IT experts. The law potentially affects every prospective IT specialist and every single Ghanaian who will utilize those services because we will pay the extra costs when these license costs and restrictions are imposed on them, because WE are the final consumers. Administrative fairness under the Wednesbury case principle mandates that the administrative body will be REASONABLE if it considers all that it ought to take into consideration. On one hand you were fighting exorbitant DSTV prices for the “people” because it benefited your mandate. On the other hand you’re now imposing exorbitant fees on the same people you’re going to release as coders and such costs will be transferred to every Ghanaian. The former government did not impose such fees under the existing law because it would’ve been unreasonable and harsh to do so. You’re known for many things but you’re not known for passing and enforcing unreasonable laws or?
Sam 'Dzata' George 🦁🇬🇭@samgeorgegh

I have always reiterated that personally and officially, I am always open to informed and constructive criticism and opinions. Criticisms that jump on bandwagon trends and fail to be based on fact are treated with contempt because they are not only mischievous but intended to misinform. To all the 'IT Professionals' who all of a sudden are making all manner of spurious claims that the @MoCDTI through its Agency - @NITAGhana - is acting illegally, please read the National Information Technology Agency Act, 2008 (Act 771), Electronic Transactions Act, 2008 (Act 772), the Fees and Charges (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 2023 (L.I. 2481) and the Fees and Charges (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Amendments) Regulations 2025 (L.I. 2512). The Ministry is simply ENFORCING existing legislation that has been on our books since 2008, 2023 and 2025. The proposed new legislation has NOT even been laid before Parliament. I welcome anyone to point out which specific action of the Agency is NOT backed by a provision under the stated legislation. We have a Country to build, and we will ensure enforcement and sanity in our Technology space. Cheers.

English
49
371
855
55.4K
Kofi Asare
Kofi Asare@0sahene·
"Honourable Minister".
Sam 'Dzata' George 🦁🇬🇭@samgeorgegh

I have always reiterated that personally and officially, I am always open to informed and constructive criticism and opinions. Criticisms that jump on bandwagon trends and fail to be based on fact are treated with contempt because they are not only mischievous but intended to misinform. To all the 'IT Professionals' who all of a sudden are making all manner of spurious claims that the @MoCDTI through its Agency - @NITAGhana - is acting illegally, please read the National Information Technology Agency Act, 2008 (Act 771), Electronic Transactions Act, 2008 (Act 772), the Fees and Charges (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 2023 (L.I. 2481) and the Fees and Charges (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Amendments) Regulations 2025 (L.I. 2512). The Ministry is simply ENFORCING existing legislation that has been on our books since 2008, 2023 and 2025. The proposed new legislation has NOT even been laid before Parliament. I welcome anyone to point out which specific action of the Agency is NOT backed by a provision under the stated legislation. We have a Country to build, and we will ensure enforcement and sanity in our Technology space. Cheers.

Français
0
0
0
56
big worm
big worm@Driz_04·
Where did the likes go?
English
2
0
0
59
Kofi Asare retweetledi
The Peswa
The Peswa@ThePeswa·
“People are not one-dimensional.” -@KafuiDey Full conversation out now. Link in bio.
English
3
12
51
2K
IC Group
IC Group@icgroupofficial·
@Triller_1 Hey Triller, thank you for reaching out. Please note that social media is not our official channel for logging complaints. To ensure your concern is handled promptly and securely, Kindly contact us via email at clientservice@ic.africa
English
3
0
0
181
Triller
Triller@Triller_1·
IC Wealth, please I’m not in your mood. @icgroupofficial. You don’t reply mail, x messages or anything. Why?
English
3
1
4
337