0xDoubt
903 posts







ZkSync has the tech, the backing, funding, and the potential to become a leading L2 solution. They just need to prioritize ecosystem growth over short-term profits for VC’s.. How? My thoughts:👇 So far, $ZK looks promising to me. Their airdrop distribution is arguably fair, and their tech is solid. Tech wise, imo their unique solutions like Paymaster could easily overshadow other L2s like $ARB and $OP ▫️They just need to nail the launch. here’s how: As an airdrop claimor of $ZK, I wouldn’t want this, but what would be best for @zksync is to list at an FDV of around $3B - $5B initially. Let the airdrop claimors exit, and setup the stage for a massive run-up for $ZK after some sideways action, UP ONLY…From $5B to $20B. this run will heat up the ecosystem, catch the community’s attention, and attract quality devs and more retail money flow, which will lead to a boom in the ecosystem.. meaning more buying pressure for $ZK ▫️ $TIA is a perfect example: Launched at $2B FDV, went to $21B, and caused a massive boom in the Cosmos ecosystem, with more retail investors and rising stakers.. And so, If zkSync wants to avoid the "down only" path like $STRK and $W, with dried-up TVL, transactions hitting ATL, and becoming a ghost chain, they need to follow in $TIA footsteps. Obviously, VCs won’t want this as they won’t make the same immediate profits they could have by listing at $15B or above FDV. But the team behind zkSync will need to consider making this tough decision for the long-term health of the ecosystem.


MY MESSAGE TO THE CRYPTO COMMUNITY















