Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect

Tired of buying tops and getting rugged on memecoins. 📉 Charts lie. The blockchain doesn't. I’m a dev (Python + Go) and I’ve decided to stop gambling and start engineering.
Building a custom On-Chain Insider Tracker from scratch to find "Dispenser Wallets" before the pump.

@Jeremybtc Fiat inflation is the slow bleed nobody hedges until it is too late. Same pattern we see on-chain when a token's liquidity gets quietly drained, by the time holders notice the exit door is already closed. At least with Bitcoin you can verify the supply yourself.

We are literally watching governments print money and wonder why people are buying Bitcoin. The math isn't that complicated.

@justinknox__ The real gap is the data layer, not the UI. No Solana trading interface surfaces holder concentration or funding chain data before you buy, which is why people keep getting rugged while staring at clean-looking charts.

the solana trading terminal gap is wild we have the fastest chain, cheapest fees, most active users. and the best way to trade on it is still... ? where is the onchain terminal that feels like hype/binance/coinbase pro but for Solana DeFi?

An 87% drawdown with real holder turnover is actually one of the strongest bullish signals on-chain, dead weight exits and new conviction enters. The tell on $PUNCH is whether you see that same independent accumulation or just clustered wallets tracing back to the same funding source.

for those who don’t know i ran $PNUT from 0 to 2.5 billion im sure 95% of these new gen traders don’t know shit about me only the fake shit they read from the engagement farmers i remember being told to give up on $PNUT after it tanked from 140m down to 18m me and a few guys kept saying billions and everyone thought we were delusional and his mindshare is gone and it wont remain etc then he kept becoming bigger and bigger and more and more people realized that his mindshare wasn’t going away then a candle appeared that i’ve never seen before in my life 100m to 500m in 1 day i remember seeing that exact buy at 150m alot of people were screaming at me to sell and i told them to fuck themselves i held till $PNUT hit billions and i made 8 figures i will do the same with $PUNCH he is bigger than $PNUT ever was. 🍌🐒

@0xleegenz That’s life

HR: "Are you open to relocate?" Me: "I'm open to teleport, evaporate, leviate, reincarnate, accelerate and migrade Please hire me"

@momehx GN brou

GN CITY

@ojeleye_john @IamRicchard Try to guess

@0xKodaDev @IamRicchard And?

Market said thank you for your donation 😭

I’ve already audited 500+ tokens, and I want to share a simple way to reduce your chances of getting rugged. Here’s a SIMPLE but effective trick. Just quickly scan the top holders list of any token you’re thinking about buying. If you see that most wallets have almost identical balances - it’s a SCAM. Don’t even touch it. Pick 3–5 random wallets from the top holders and compare them. Do they look similar? • Same number of transactions • Similar balances • Similar creation times If the answer is yes, you’re most likely looking at a scam token. Why does this happen? The most common way to scam people is simple. The dev mints a large portion of the supply, spreads it across dozens or hundreds of wallets (using scripts, obviously not manually), and waits. At any moment, those wallets can act as a control package and start selling. You get the shitcoin. They get your SOL. Price goes to zero, the flow of “investors” stops, and the token dies. That’s how it works.

@milkers As weird as it sounds, I audited this token and it’s clean… Honestly hard to believe.

$milkers has 90% relay-funded wallets. Usually that ends the conversation. This time it does not Risk score 29/100 Entry prices span a 69x range from early snipes to late buyers. 23 holders in loss, 55 in profit. That kind of mixed PnL only shows up in organic trading Top holder at 3%. SOL balances range from dust wallets to 100+ SOL. LP is burned with 425 SOL in the pool Five small clusters detected but none above 2.8% of supply. No single operator pulling strings High relay ratio with clean fundamentals underneath. The relays are the outlier here, not the other way around

nNcqotFpBF7hsAqbNs1v2cYWeMnaKjFc3D2gHoQpump We launched this coin on January 23 as an experiment to see just how far a project could grow when driven by pure social momentum. The response has been unreal. From March 5th to April 2nd alone, we’ve gained over 80,000 followers and we’re just getting started. Let’s be honest, attention is the real currency of the internet and we know exactly how to capture it. We’re building something bold, viral, and impossible to ignore. This is only the beginning. Milkers isn’t just another coin, it’s on track to become one of the biggest and most recognizable pages in its space

@Kingstaccz Every "private chat" token I have audited had the same setup. One wallet funding 30 holders, identical balances, 100% relay funders, and a locked exit for everyone except the guy collecting 4 SOL entry fees.

I’m building something incredible If you haven’t joined the private chat yet You will never understand what a 100x is. Shoot me a message if you want to join 4 sols will change your life.

@kilorippy True, but in memecoins the game is often rigged before it starts. Half the tokens we trace have one operator distributing supply across dozens of wallets designed to exit into real buyers. The edge most "winners" found is just information asymmetry built on disposable wallets.

to make money in trading someone has to lose money it’s part of the game which has been for a long time in stocks and the same results for memecoins the reason the winners stay winning is because they’ve found their edge and perfected it nothing wrong with taking risks

$milkers scores 29/100. Low risk on paper but 90% of holders were funded through relay wallets. Three separate wallet clusters detected holding coordinated positions. That relay number is uncomfortable for a "low risk" token $BURNIE scores 24/100. Cleaner overall but one cluster of 7 wallets controls 8.6% of supply. 16 wallets could drain a quarter of pool liquidity if they exit together Both technically in the low risk range. Neither is a obvious scam setup. But trending and safe are two completely different things. The on-chain data has nuance that the hype never will

Unpopular take but "the signals were visible early" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Most protocols already have monitoring, the problem is nobody acts on alerts at 3am on a weekend. The tech exists. What is missing is operational discipline, dedicated responders with authority to pause contracts without a governance vote. That is not a tooling problem, it is a people problem.

bad day for Solana DeFi. 👇 $280M exploited on @DriftProtocol yesterday. and many other protocols got hit indirectly. i was affected. > what went wrong: ❌ onchain signals were visible early, reaction was too slow $280M gone because of a late response. protocols carelessly managing users' hard earned money. > what needs to change: ✅ Drift and every active protocol must build real-time alert systems the Solana Foundation needs to multiply its investment in OpSec. users need to stop assuming protocols are immune, if you're chasing APY% without understanding the risk surface, this is your lesson❗️ is DeFi still relevant? yes. is it worth the risk? only if you understand it. trust is hurt. it will take time to rebuild. but we don't abandon the chain. we fix what's broken and come back stronger. Traders had 10/10. Solana DeFi got April 1st. 🤡 no one said this was supposed to be easy. learn the lesson. improve your OpSec. stay in the game.

@AstaWeb3 attention..

What are we buying today boys?

@Vibatron are you seriously?

Shill the ticker that's here, I'm going all in

@erequendi Feels like that sometimes haha

is it true ?

Guys, this is awesome and I really appreciate what you’re doing, but please add a Jira task to include the SOL amount for swaps on pump.fun. Without it, it’s impossible to parse the average entry price of buyers on the bonding curve via the Helius Enhanced Transactions API.

Important You may be missing transactions (tx) in your tx history! Due to the way Solana works, when you fetch the history of an address via gSFA, it will NOT include all of the associated token account txs that the address owns. You have to derive these separately (which might be hundreds to thouands of accounts and extra RPC calls) and merge their histories together. This is extremely annoying, inefficient and counterintuitive. (thank you anatoly) We have fixed it. With our new method, getTransactionsForAddress, simply pass in 'tokenAccounts: balanceChanged' as a filter and it will fetch all unlinked token accounts, merge them together and get you a unified history Fewer API calls, fewer lines of code, and much lower latency. Only on Helius. (As an example see the below graphic for toly.sol where the standard RPC method misses the txns in the red on the left)

@Jackkk but hooooow?!

+ 12,000 followers and 200M impressions good start to the year

@shotguncaio GM brrrrrou

gm