Savz

@traderpow an inspirational to believors worldwide

5 years later, made it to 170K. Wow. I definitely do not get everything right, nor do I want to, but I sure as hell try to make them count when I am (don't blind tail me ever). But thank you for making your way to my trading journey from bears to bulls ! Next stop, 200K ! ! 💙

@FlippingProfits you misspelled LFG

something tells me lfi is going to rip insane

@traderpow never stop clicking

More clicking, less thinking Don't overcomplicate it

@LetsFkinGoooo the proven zone awaits

Late is when they rush in Not when your alone Choose your own spot Be early

@CookerFlips you forgot the “OG that was made 400 days ago” that actually has nothing to do with the coin that’s currently running at all

Every day there's a new way added to pvp At some point it'll be 700 permutations of how to PVP a coin Exponential coin creation, dex paid, right name, capitalization, charity, fees redirect, color highlighting ticker, you name it 🤣

@MidjetV2 in Midjet we trust

Good morning everyone LFG day 2 More content coming out today that I think people will really like Someone from the community also made a funny unique video which I'm curious how CT will respond will be out on the offical account today have many things to do and will keep everyone updated on every step it's just the beginning LFG.

@ofuji_tries bring back 2024 cult coins

@MidjetV2 LFG

Many people are making the mistake as brushing this off as another slop coin take your time to genuinely read my article I want to do something different. I want to try and attempt a change regardless I will be here tomorrow pushing LFG. I will be here in a week I will be here in a month I'll give it my everything

@orangie congrats big bro

5 years later my high school sweetheart said yes 😍💍

@MissionGains RUH ROH RAGGY THEY FOUND MY REDGER

This nigga lick thought he could scooby doo his way out of getting caught by converting himself to shaggy with stolen scooby snacks 😭

@kaizokucollin typical Beckett shenanigans

u gotta be kidding me... never sending to beckett again

@sullyfromDeets send me the next one early so I can larp with it

Using my screenshots to larp… Outrageous

@sullyfromDeets attack the weak*

Attack the week.

@YesImTheWinner @shufflecom @rainbetcom @Stake @Razedcom @DATDropCases

Gambling since I was 14. Over the last 9 years I’ve lost every penny I earned. In the last 12 months alone I’ve lost $60k where $40k is loans. Funny. Special thank you to: @shufflecom duel.com @rainbetcom @Stake @Razedcom @DATDropCases

@TradingKing13 @1Chul_TCG says the guy still joining csgo skin giveaways in the big 26

@0xSavz @1Chul_TCG “Aura” this shit is beyond corny

There's no way my round 1 opponent is using PSA 10 slabs as his dons

@sullyfromDeets the government hid a crypto-shrinkray in the moon

Does anyone have a reasonable explanation as to why crypto is performing so badly against other assets lately?

@a1lon9 Bro beat the charges

Creator fees need change. When Dynamic Fees V1 was introduced a few months ago, the goal was to help create more success cases in our ecosystem by giving top project founders and teams a strong incentive to launch their token on pump fun and drive it to success. Only a week later, the potential of the mechanism showed: more and more creators - many of which have never touched a crypto app before - began organically launching coins and streaming on the platform. The Streaming meta created some of the best onchain conditions of 2025, doubling activity by more than 2x, as evidenced by the below chart showing pump fun bonding curve volumes (in USD). However, it wasn’t sustainable, and it exposed critical issues within the platform. While creator fees are a game changer for Project Tokens (those with well-defined active teams, rather than communities) they failed to meaningfully change the behavior of the average memecoin token deployer. Therefore, creator fees may have skewed the incentive for users to engage in low-risk activity (coin creation) instead of high-risk activity (trading), which is dangerous, because traders are the lifeblood of the platform. Pump fun’s mission is to create the best possible environment for coins to thrive, and successful tokens are much more likely to come about in an environment where traders are incentivized to participate in the market, provide liquidity, create volume, and take risk. Furthermore, Creator Fees on the platform have lacked utility. Many narratives could use Creator Fees to raise the ceiling for that project by, for example, sending the fees to a notable person that is related to the narrative and onboard them to the community e.g. White Whale, rainbowfish, etc. The platform so far fails at providing a good user experience here, oftentimes requiring users to CTO coins, trust other people to fulfill their promises, etc. So, to summarize our analysis: - Creator Fees are a great tool to incentivize high-quality Project Tokens. Perhaps they require tweaking, and perhaps other protocol adjustments are needed to create an optimal environment for Project Tokens to thrive, but Dynamic Fees V1 was undoubtedly a directionally correct step for these kinds of token projects - Creator Fees can be used in a variety of ways to significantly improve the token’s investability but require better UX - Many tokens, however, don’t need Creator Fees, and this results in a more uneven playing field, where memecoin creation was incentivized too much instead of memecoin trading. Major changes are coming. I can’t say too much yet, but as always, pump fun will take a market-based approach, and let traders decide whether a narrative truly deserves Creator Fees, and how those should be used. There will be more communications coming from me soon about what we’re building and the future of $PUMP I’m extremely excited for what 2026 holds.

@JJoohnj Got a couple of these bad boys in a 10

oh great .. sold at $400 now it’s a $650+ card 😀🤣🤣 hasn’t even been a week 🫩

@sullyfromDeets @grok Stupid robot did the wrong pfp

@0xSavz @grok ???

I just want to talk about memecoins all day long again