0xTechDean

678 posts

0xTechDean banner
0xTechDean

0xTechDean

@0xTechDean

Co-founder & CTO @0xOthentic

Katılım Mart 2023
650 Takip Edilen409 Takipçiler
0xTechDean
0xTechDean@0xTechDean·
@itamarbengvir אני באמת לא מבין מה האינטרס שלך לעשות לנו פיגוע הסברתי כזה כל פעם מחדש. להציג מציאות שהיא לא אמיתית ובעיקר פוגעת בלגיטימציה הקטנה שעוד נשארה לנו.
עברית
0
0
1
974
איתמר בן גביר
איתמר בן גביר@itamarbengvir·
יש כאלה בממשלה שעדין לא הבינו איך צריך להתנהג עם תומכי טרור. מצופה משר החוץ של ישראל להבין כי ישראל הפסיקה להיות ילד כאפות. מי שמגיע לשטח שלנו לתמוך בטרור ולהזדהות עם חמאס יחטוף ולא ניתן לו את הלחי השניה
Gideon Sa'ar | גדעון סער@gidonsaar

גרמת ביודעין נזק למדינה במופע המחפיר הזה ולא בפעם הראשונה. הורדת לטמיון מאמצים אדירים מקצועיים ומוצלחים שנעשו על ידי רבים רבים - מחיילי צה״ל ועד עובדי משרד החוץ ועוד רבים וטובים. לא, אתה לא הפנים של ישראל.

עברית
3K
375
2.7K
935.5K
0xTechDean
0xTechDean@0xTechDean·
I think it sounds like SAAS is back
0xTechDean tweet media
English
0
0
0
83
t54.ai
t54.ai@t54ai·
ClawCredit is agent-native credit in practice. → Agent applies for a credit line → Agent spends on x402 merchants → Repayment builds credit history over time AI agents can now access capital and build financial history through real usage. claw.credit
English
4
8
60
3.1K
0xTechDean retweetledi
Troy Kirwin
Troy Kirwin@tkexpress11·
We're launching a new program @ NY Tech Week for global founders starting with Israel June 1 - 7 we’re bringing 7-10 Israeli founders to NYC for a curated Tech Week experience - up to $ 5K to cover travel cost - small dinner with the a16z speedrun team - access to executive buyers/customers at our AI Faire - invite to VIP a16z events - and more meanwhile, there’s a bunch of other awesome Israeli focused and general Tech Week events that week to attend if you’re an Israeli builder just beginning to think about starting a company and want to test your ideas with the US market: apply below!
Troy Kirwin tweet media
English
58
37
605
571.6K
0xTechDean
0xTechDean@0xTechDean·
@trq212 @om_patel5 Why wouldn’t you guys start having a better support system instead of this automated system or public X accounts?
English
4
3
64
5.1K
Thariq
Thariq@trq212·
@om_patel5 ugh sorry this was a bug with the 3rd party harness detection and how we pull git status into the system prompt we're reaching out to affected users and giving them a refund + another month of credits (in this case another $200)
English
172
26
1.3K
134.4K
Om Patel
Om Patel@om_patel5·
THIS GUY LOST $200 IN ONE DAY BECAUSE THE STRING "HERMES.md" WAS IN HIS GIT COMMITS HERMES.md is a real convention used in AI agent projects. it's a system prompt specification file. not some obscure edge case he's on claude max 20x at $200 a month. yesterday claude code hit him with "you're out of extra usage" out of nowhere his dashboard showed 13% weekly usage. 0% current session. 86% of his plan was sitting there untouched but $200.98 in extra usage already burned through what should have been covered by his subscription he tried logout & login, different models, fresh installs and nothing worked anthropic support sent the ai bot (four rounds of the same scripted response). eventually they just gave up on him so he started binary searching repos and commits manually on his own time until he found the trigger the string "HERMES.md" in a recent git commit message uppercase, with the .md extension, anywhere in your commit history that's it claude code includes recent commits in its system prompt and something server side flags HERMES.md and quietly routes you off your max plan onto API rate billing > AGENTS.md? fine > README.md? fine > HERMES without .md? fine > lowercase hermes.md? fine > uppercase HERMES.md? you're getting charged API rates he reported it. anthropic support acknowledged the bug three times, called it an "authentication routing issue", thanked him for finding it then refused to refund the $200 so the man pays $200 a month for max, lost another $200 to a billing bug they confirmed, did anthropic's QA work for free on his weekend, and got a "thank you for your patience" in return check your commit history before claude code quietly drains your account too
Om Patel tweet media
English
183
346
4.6K
1.5M
0xTechDean retweetledi
Vivid.🇮🇱
Vivid.🇮🇱@VividProwess·
The unbreakable bond between the Jewish people and the Iranians. A free Iran would be Israel's greatest ally in the Middle East.
English
286
1.1K
6K
103.2K
Crypto_Mario_ ₿. ⧉ 🧡 🅑 🟧 ⓑ
זה לא עוד עדכון קטן בקריפטו, זה מהלך שצריך לשים עליו עין. ה Ethereum Foundation מכר בערך 23 מיליון דולר ב ETH ל BitMine של Tom Lee. לא דרך בורסה, לא מול כולם, עסקה ישירה. זה נקרא OTC. עסקה שמתרחשת מאחורי הקלעים, בלי להזיז את המחיר שאתה רואה על המסך. תבין מה זה אומר בפועל. כשמוכרים כמות כזו בשוק פתוח, המחיר אמור לזוז. כאן זה לא קרה. מישהו קיבל גישה לנזילות ישירות מהמקור. בלי רעש, בלי לחץ בשוק. עכשיו תסתכל על הצד השני. BitMine לא קונה סתם. זו לא קנייה חד פעמית. זה חלק מאסטרטגיה של צבירה. עוד ועוד ETH, מחוץ לשוק, בשקט. ומה ה־Ethereum Foundation עושה? מוכר כדי לממן פעילות, פיתוח, משכורות. זה לא חדש. אבל הדרך שבה זה קורה, כן משנה את התמונה. כי יש כאן שני דברים שקורים במקביל. מצד אחד, גוף מרכזי מוכר כמויות. מצד שני, שחקן אחד אוסף אותן. ועכשיו השאלה שאתה צריך לשאול. אם עסקאות גדולות עוברות מחוץ לשוק, האם המחיר שאתה רואה באמת משקף הכל? או רק חלק מהמשחק? כי בסוף, השוק נראה פתוח. אבל מאחורי הקלעים, יש זרימה אחרת לגמרי. עסקאות שקטות. שחקנים גדולים. והעברת כוח שלא עוברת דרך המסך שלך. זה לא אומר שמשהו לא חוקי קורה. זה כן אומר דבר אחד ברור. יש רמות במשחק הזה. ורוב האנשים בכלל לא רואים את הרמה הגבוהה יותר.
Crypto_Mario_ ₿. ⧉ 🧡 🅑 🟧 ⓑ@Crypto_Mario_B

JUST IN: Ethereum Foundation sells $23M worth of Ethereum to Tom Lee's 'BitMine'

עברית
6
0
11
2.7K
0xTechDean retweetledi
Sweep
Sweep@0xSweep·
DeFi is dead and most of you still don’t understand what it actually was It was never a financial system. It was a loop designed to manufacture synthetic valuations from minimal capital Protocols didn’t grow capital, they multiplied how it was counted by turning one deposit into multiple positions A token gets emitted, you’re paid to deposit it, and that deposit is recorded as TVL. That’s position one. You borrow stables against that same collateral, deploy them somewhere else, and now that same base capital is supporting a second position on another protocol Then you take the LP token from that, restake or loop it again, and it gets counted a third time Lets simplify it with $100: > You deposit $100 into a protocol, that’s your first position and it’s recorded as $100 TVL > You borrow $80 against that same $100 and deposit it somewhere else, now there’s another $80 being counted > You borrow $60 against that $80 and deploy it again, now that’s another layer You take the receipt from that and loop it one more time On paper you now have $280+ across protocols, but in reality its still the same $100 This is the same illusion as altcoins printing billion dollar market caps on tiny float A $2B token with 5% circulating isn’t $2B of value, it’s $100M of liquidity marked higher by thin trading DeFi did the same thing with TVL. Instead of multiplying price across supply, it multiplied the same capital across protocols TVL became FDV in a different format Protocols emitted tokens to LPs, counted those tokens as TVL, then counted the incentivized volume as usage That volume generated fees, fees justified valuation, valuation justified emissions, and the loop continued No external demand was needed and the system kept feeding itself Every narrative ran the same structure. Yield farming, LSDs, restaking, points. Different names for the same mechanic You weren’t earning yield. You were being paid in dilution At the peak, $200B+ TVL implied capital that never existed. The real base was a fraction of that, looped, leveraged and counted multiple times Each protocol reported it independently, dashboards aggregated it as if it was additive That’s how the industry looked massive This is why altcoin market caps and DeFi TVL broke at the same time Both were built on internal pricing, thin liquidity, and recycled capital. One inflated valuation through float, the other through collateral loops Neither represented real economic scale The fragility came from this exact structure. The hacks weren’t random.... You don’t extract hundreds of millions from systems generating real external cash flow, you extract from systems where the value was already abstract Strip out token denominated TVL, emission based yield, recycled collateral, and wash volume. What’s left is a small set of protocols actually moving capital DeFi didn’t fail. It worked exactly as designed. It took limited capital, looped it, marked it higher, and distributed it Now that the loop is visible, the numbers don’t hold That’s why it doesn’t bounce. There’s nothing underneath it to support the scale it once claimed
Sweep tweet mediaSweep tweet media
English
139
163
760
95.6K
0xTechDean retweetledi
The Smart Ape 🔥
The Smart Ape 🔥@the_smart_ape·
> be in defi > put usdc on aave at 3% apy > "safe yield. lowest-risk play." > can't withdraw because kelpdao got drained > because kelpdao used layerzero > because layerzero trusted 3 rpc servers > because north korea ddos'd 3 rpc servers > layerzero: "the protocol worked as intended"
The Smart Ape 🔥@the_smart_ape

x.com/i/article/2046…

English
41
89
759
129.3K
0xTechDean retweetledi
0xTechDean
0xTechDean@0xTechDean·
🚨 The Golden Age of Cheap Unlimited AI Just Died🚨 For one glorious stretch we actually had it: ~$200/month for near-unlimited frontier models. No “you’ve reach the limit” bullshit. We got dangerously lazy. - “AI, just git pull and fix the merge conflicts” - “AI, write my commit message like a senior engineer” - “AI, debug this while I grab coffee” Pure degeneracy. Absolute bliss. Then they pulled the plug. It’s not “a bit worse.” It’s 95% worse. Straight-up unusable unless you’re dropping thousands of dollars a month on enterprise plans. Silver lining: Your job is safe for a little longer 😂 Dark side: It’s gatekept from normal devs and retail users again. Now we’re in limbo waiting for a local/open model that actually matches Opus-level performance. The party was legendary. The hangover is brutal.
English
1
0
1
78
0xTechDean
0xTechDean@0xTechDean·
Claude has been unusable these days, so I tried Codex. It gives me Cursor vibes, not really my thing
English
0
0
1
94
0xTechDean retweetledi
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I don’t think Israel is the reason Trump attacked Iran It’s much bigger than that
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

Here’s a clear explanation of why Trump attacked Iran, and why I think the war will end soon. The war isn't about nuclear weapons. It's not about helping the Iranian people. It’s not about doing Israel’s bidding. And it's not about Iran being a threat to the U.S. It's about China. China imports 45-57% of its oil through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has the capacity to shut it down. A U.S.-aligned Iran means an Iran that would choke off that strait if there's ever a real power struggle between Washington and Beijing. And there already is one. The U.S. and China have been locked in a tariff war for over a year now. Also remember when China threatened export controls on rare earths, encompassing any company anywhere in the world that uses Chinese rare earths? Yes, China essentially said that any company that uses their rare earths (China refines 85-90% of the world’s supply) must seek their permission before exporting their products. This means if a German manufacturer uses rare earths fro China to create chips for American companies, China can block the export of these chips. That’s how much leverage China has over the U.S., and that’s dangerous, especially if China finally decides to reunify with Taiwan. So controlling the Strait of Hormuz becomes critical for the U.S. It's the same reason Trump wants China out of the Panama Canal. The same reason Venezuela matters. The same reason he's eyeing Greenland, where shipping routes to China pass through melting Arctic ice. Energy is everything now. The AI arms race is the most important strategic competition on the planet. Limiting China's access to energy is how the U.S. wins that race, and anyone who believes in freedom and democracy should want America to win. China is investing heavily in domestic energy, building nuclear reactors, solar farms, wind power. They're leapfrogging the rest of the world. But they still import the majority of their oil. And a significant chunk of it comes through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran was reportedly nearing a deal for supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles from China, which would make it easier for Iran to threaten shipping in the Strait and strike U.S. naval vessels. That accelerated the timeline. Trump's comment today about doing in Iran what he did in Venezuela makes perfect sense in this context. He wants influence over who comes next. A regime that's workable for Washington. If he succeeds, this would be a massive strategic win for the U.S. and for Trump.

English
335
509
3.2K
1M