0xCole.eth🛡️
696 posts
0xCole.eth🛡️
@0xc0le
Crypto @ SVB | Decentralization Maximalist
Katılım Kasım 2020
1.5K Takip Edilen387 Takipçiler
0xCole.eth🛡️ retweetledi
New year, new job opportunity.
We’re hiring a remote Crypto Enhanced Due Diligence Associate/Degen at SVB (we’re so back) and First Citizens Bank.
Join our growing team!
cryptocurrencyjobs.co/operations/fir… via @jobsincrypto
English
0xCole.eth🛡️ retweetledi
Taking UGA at halftime on Polymarket every game is outperforming the rest of my portfolio by far
English
@binji_x Unironically I onboarded a lot of normies via hamster racing
English
0xCole.eth🛡️ retweetledi
There is a lot of fighting left in this case before sentencing, and I think Mr. Storm will stay for it.
Inner City Press@innercitypress
Judge: He may appeal, he has every incentive to stay and fight. He is not a risk of flight, given the size of the bond. There is a lot of fighting left in this case before sentencing, and I think Mr. Storm will stay for it.
English
0xCole.eth🛡️ retweetledi
Roman Storm was convicted for conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business under Section 1960.
The jury was deadlocked on money laundering and sanctions. DOJ will decide in the coming days if it wants to retry those charges in a new trial.
A sad day for DeFi.
English
0xCole.eth🛡️ retweetledi
🚨NEW: Just caught @rstormsf outside the courtroom. I asked how he was feeling. In a quiet voice, but with a noticeable smile, he told me:
“It’s a big win. The ‘1960’ charge is bullshit and we’re going to fight it all the way. You know how President Trump said ‘fight, fight, fight’? We’ll do that too.”
He expressed relief at not being remanded to jail and mentioned his 5-year-old daughter as one of the reasons he plans to keep fighting the one charge he was convicted on.
He said he’s heading back to Seattle tomorrow.
Eleanor Terrett@EleanorTerrett
🚨NEW: Some initial confusion over the status of the third count, which the jury could not unanimously decide. But to clarify: @rstormsf has been found guilty on one charge: conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business (aka “the 1960 charge”), which, according to Storm’s lawyer Keri Axel, carries a maximum sentence of five years. The jury was hung on the other two counts: money laundering and sanctions violations. Judge Failla denied the government’s motion to remand him to jail, stating: “There is a lot of fighting left in this case before sentencing, and I think Mr. Storm will stay to fight it.” As the government team exited the courtroom, I asked AUSA Rehn for comment. He seemed caught off guard (may not have realized I was press), stammered, and said: “No comment right now, but we will… yeah…” before walking out the door. Storm remained in the courtroom, conferring with his legal team. His emotions are hard to read as he’s remained pretty stoic throughout this whole trial. I’ll try to get a comment from him as well. Back in again…
English
0xCole.eth🛡️ retweetledi
*SEC RELEASES STATEMENT ON LIQUID STAKING ACTIVITIES
*LIQUID STAKING ACTIVITIES NOT CONSIDERED SECURITIES
English
@davecraige @iampaulgrewal Once again, did @rstormsf accept and transmit funds or did he simply provide software? If you’re arguing that he accepted and transmitted funds, explain how he did that through a noncustodial protocol.
English
Six years later I’m still processing that in 2019 the US government — FinCEN specifically— told us all that “an anonymizing software provider is not a money transmitter.” And yet the calamitous campaign against such providers continues to the present day.
English
@hanni_abu @davecraige If you look back at his tweets, it’s pretty clear that he’s just mad that mixers compete with his XMR and/or ZEC bags
English
My favorite larp in this industry is @davecraige
He pretends to be against Roman Storm to rile people up and get them to donate to Roman's legal fund
freeromanstorm.com
He's even donated over $10k to the fund himself!
Thanks @davecraige ❤️
English
0xCole.eth🛡️ retweetledi
During deliberation, the jury is allowed to ask the judge questions and the judge only sends back a response after talking to prosecution and defense about it.
First jury question is basically "did the government ever have evidence to prove its case?"
Bullish Roman. Hopes up 🤞
Inner City Press@innercitypress
All rise! Judge: The jury has asked, Did the Gov't have to submit proof of the charges to get indictment? I don't think this is something they should be asking about. I propose to answer, You are not to consider how the US got the indictment
English