
Luca
2.6K posts

Luca
@1306lou
CS Postdoc @tu_wien 💻 • From L’Aquila 🇮🇹 • Opinions my own • ❤️, 🔄 ≠ endorsement • Are birds free from the chains of the skyway?
Vienna, Austria Katılım Mayıs 2010
335 Takip Edilen89 Takipçiler

@Scfx1234 @GianOngarelli In realtà già ora tutti i cittadini 🇪🇺 hanno il diritto di votare in alcune elezioni amministrative locali/regionali del Paese in cui sono residenti. Io ho votato in 2 Paesi diversi
Italiano

@GianOngarelli Se non si vota per cittadinanza lo si potrebbe fare per residenza a prescindere dalla nazione in cui ti trovi ma sospetto che non ve starebbe comunque bene. Lato mio per me ha più senso poter votare per il paese in cui vivi in quel momento.
Italiano

People saying that LLMs are better than Zotero for compiling references are going to turn me into the Joker
David Madden@davidjmadden
Citation managers such as Zotero etc are more annoying than they are useful and instead of using them, it's better to just manually compile bibliographies
English

@ultimoranet Quest’uomo ha piantato i semi che molti anni dopo avrebbero contribuito a salvare L’Aquila. Va ricordato ❤️🩹
Italiano


Does anyone know what cafe was used to film the bit of the New Year’s concert that aired a few minutes ago? Asking for a friend 👉👈 #vienna #wien #wienerphilarmoniker
English

@youjiaxuan By all accounts bar them from reviewing again, but doxxing seems way too much
English

The ICLR leak is a disaster, but let’s talk about how to actually save the Peer Review process.
The Fix: Ending anonymity for irresponsible reviewers.
ICLR maintains high submission quality (at least in early years) because rejected papers are public—authors fear the reputation hit. Why don't we hold reviewers to the same standard?
If a review is fundamentally irresponsible (after confirming by ICLR Program Committee), the reviewer should lose the privilege of anonymity.
• Good review = Anonymous (if desired).
• "Rejected" review = Public Name.
Should add a tab to irresponsible reviewers, similar to publicly showing the rejected papers
#tab-reject" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">openreview.net/group?id=ICLR.…
We need symmetry. Authors face consequences for low quality submissions. Reviewers should too. @iclr_conf
ICLR@iclr_conf
English

@C4MURRIUS4 A un club dei racconti dove avevo organizzato una sessione su Italo Calvino :)
Italiano

@infinite_jaz If you're still in contact with him, maybe you could suggest he may apply in Europe? Some countries even have special programs for Palestinian students. And since he was accepted into a US college he has fairly good chances
English

@JamrockHobo @tritlo you just got on my fave Disco Elysium account how is this happening 😭
English

@jonathonwarren @tomwarren I used not one, but two notched MBPs since then… life uhh finds a way
English

@jonathonwarren @tomwarren That's going to mess the menu bar up, for starters
English


Un pacato Francesco Costa analizza il #Referendum. Difficile dargli torto ilpost.it/episodes/quest… (livello di pacatezza: Goku SS1 contro Freezer)
Italiano

If this is legit I might cry, he almost sounds like Rolling Thunder Revue era Bob 🥹
Brian Hiatt@hiattb
I’m almost positive that Bob Dylan had that laser treatment on his vocal cords and/or quit smoking. He sounds decades younger than he did 10 years ago.
English

B-but it was typeset in LaTeX, it HAS to be legit
Robert Palgrave@Robert_Palgrave
Update on this paper from last year on AI in scientific discovery. MIT put out a press release: "no confidence in the provenance, reliability or validity of the data...[or] veracity of the research." "The author is no longer at MIT."
English

@angusjnic Arguably one of the hottest deadlines in AI is tomorrow; I suspect correlation 😀
English

⚠️ Attention: The site is currently down. Our engineering team is investigating. We will update as soon as possible. You can track progress here: status.overleaf.com Sorry for any inconvenience.
English















