B 🔯

905 posts

B 🔯

B 🔯

@2024VISIONPROOF

Katılım Ağustos 2025
86 Takip Edilen17 Takipçiler
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@Telegraph the same rory stewart who met a group of friendly young black men, and a few days later described his encounter with “gangsters”
English
0
0
0
45
The Telegraph
The Telegraph@Telegraph·
✍️ 'The former Tory minister is quick to belittle anyone who realises that Britain is not a beautifully integrated multicultural paradise' I Writes Michael Deacon Read Michael Deacon's full column below 🔗 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/0…
The Telegraph tweet media
English
41
30
159
32.1K
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@hearnimator the logic is -> they could protest near a synagogue because zionism is separate from judaism and so there is no problem -> a jewish judge, however, cannot judge on this case because judaism is too close to zionism -> in which case they shouldn’t protest near the synagogue
English
0
0
1
196
Alex Hearn
Alex Hearn@hearnimator·
Antizionism says Jewish judges can’t be trusted because they go to synagogue.
Alex Hearn tweet media
English
1
7
15
373
Tomos Doran 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 🇮🇱 🇵🇸
A major giveaway that most "anti-Zionism" is really just antisemitism is that it's never enough for Israel to merely be a bad actor; it has to be the worst state to exist in the history of the world. Which is palpably absurd, but that's essential to the very nature of Jew-hatred.
Tomos Doran 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 🇮🇱 🇵🇸 tweet media
English
198
93
863
20.9K
Jack Mendel
Jack Mendel@Mendelpol·
Either I haven't seen any April Fools articles yet, or the news is so insane, that it just blends in seamlessly now.
English
1
0
10
674
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@hoffman_noa i imagine he regretted this performative cultural appropriation when he had to have another helping of maror.
English
0
0
0
374
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@Mendelpol the logic is -> they could protest near a synagogue because zionism is separate from judaism and so there is no problem -> a jewish judge, however, cannot judge on this case because judaism is too close to zionism -> in which case they shouldn’t protest near the synagogue
English
0
0
0
19
Jack Mendel
Jack Mendel@Mendelpol·
He doesn't like Jews. He's obsessed with Jews.
Jack Mendel tweet mediaJack Mendel tweet mediaJack Mendel tweet media
English
1
0
7
303
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@BarbaraRich_law @MarcGoldberg111 the logic is -> they could protest near a synagogue because zionism is separate from judaism and so there is no problem -> a jewish judge, however, cannot judge on this case because judaism is too close to zionism -> in which case they shouldn’t protest near the synagogue
English
0
0
1
17
Barbara Rich
Barbara Rich@BarbaraRich_law·
@MarcGoldberg111 If the defendants’ lawyers thought there was a risk of actual or apparent bias because of the judge’s personal views and associations they would have asked him to recuse himself? Did they? I haven’t read that they did so
English
2
0
15
380
Marc Goldberg
Marc Goldberg@MarcGoldberg111·
They’re attacking a Jewish judge. Their reason for doing so is his participation in the Jewish community. If this demonisation continues it will either be the undoing of the Anti Zionist Movement or of the Jews in Britain.
Anti-zionist Movement@azm_org_uk

Judge was Daniel Sternberg. Sternberg is a board member of the movement for Reform Judaism, which elects Rabbis for the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Reform Judaism’s website shows clear links to ‘Israel’. Sternberg previously dismissed a case against Tommy Robinson.

English
3
3
22
1.1K
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@MarcGoldberg111 the logic is -> they could protest near a synagogue because zionism is separate from judaism and so there is no problem -> a jewish judge, however, cannot judge on this case because judaism is too close to zionism -> in which case they shouldn’t protest near the synagogue
English
0
0
0
17
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@stephenpollard the logic is -> they could protest near a synagogue because zionism is separate from judaism and so there is no problem -> a jewish judge, however, cannot judge on this case because judaism is too close to zionism -> in which case they shouldn’t protest near the synagogue
English
0
0
0
41
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@stephenpollard the logic is -> they could protest near a synagogue because zionism is separate from judaism and so there is no problem -> a jewish judge, however, cannot judge on this case because judaism is too close to zionism -> in which case they shouldn’t protest near the synagogue
English
0
0
3
117
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@nicolelampert i thought you’re reporting wasn’t true though? that’s why zack is spending passover looking so happy with his family
English
1
0
4
123
Nicole Lampert
Nicole Lampert@nicolelampert·
‘Next year in Jerusalem!’ L’Chaim boys.
English
9
8
231
2.7K
Nicole Lampert
Nicole Lampert@nicolelampert·
Owen Jones and Zack Polanski celebrating the original Zionist festival together. If only we British Jews understood irony.
Nicole Lampert tweet media
English
94
114
881
31.7K
Owen Jones
Owen Jones@owenjonesjourno·
A lovely Passover Seder with this legendary crew. We heard the story of Passover and talked about the Jewish traditions of liberating all peoples from injustice and operation. Chag sameach ✡️
Owen Jones tweet mediaOwen Jones tweet media
English
393
133
1.8K
141.8K
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@HeidiBachram the logic is -> they could protest near a synagogue because zionism is separate from judaism and so there is no problem -> a jewish judge, however, cannot judge on this case because judaism is too close to zionism -> in which case they shouldn’t protest near the synagogue
English
1
0
1
35
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@OzKaterji sorry - asking in good faith - could you expand/ elaborate?
English
0
0
0
147
Oz Katerji
Oz Katerji@OzKaterji·
This is categorically false, the choice was between war and war, the difference was that under the JCPOA it was only Syrians, Iraqis, Lebanese and Yemenis that had to be on the receiving end of that war. No Americans or Israelis involved? Not a problem for Washington.
Dr. Jeffrey Lewis@ArmsControlWonk

Narrator: In fact, it was always a binary choice between the JCPOA and war. The people who opposed it were, in fact, warmongers who believed the sooner that war came, the better.

English
9
32
192
17.1K
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@mishtal @PSCupdates having a lot of fun comparing their reaction to this “disgraceful decision” compared to the gleeful reaction to october 7th
English
0
0
1
24
Palestine Solidarity Campaign
The judge has ruled that Ben Jamal and Chris Nineham are guilty on all charges. This is a disgraceful decision. We will follow up soon with a full statement. Our right to protest is precious, and is undermined by this decision, but the fight is not over.
Palestine Solidarity Campaign tweet media
English
197
513
1.1K
267.9K
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@DPJHodges this is the first episode of the thick of it - he holds a big press conference to announce nothing
English
0
0
4
166
(((Dan Hodges)))
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges·
Currently watching journalists struggling - and failing - to get Keir Starmer to explain why he's summoned them to Downing Street for a national press conference. Literally not announcing anything.
English
426
891
6.6K
228.7K
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@JewishChron ok this is the best april fools i’ve seen
English
0
0
3
80
Hamish Falconer MP
Hamish Falconer MP@HFalconerMP·
Pleasure to welcome @AH_AlSharaa to @UKParliament this morning, on his first official visit to the UK. We’re committed to working with the Syrian Government to support an inclusive political transition and a secure, prosperous future for all Syrians.
Hamish Falconer MP tweet media
English
2.9K
260
2K
655.8K
B 🔯
B 🔯@2024VISIONPROOF·
@SCynic1 why? genuinely asking, not really paid attention to this story
English
1
0
2
844