Leisa

X is a wonderful place to watch people use their free speech to reveal themselves. This is just one reason why freedom of speech is so important.

@JennMGreenberg Only two of these statements have been verified at this time: Tyler’s grandpa gave him the gun, and Tyler’s DNA was on the gun. That’s it. There has been zero evidence that anything else is true. That’s why there’s a trial.

This is what Candace and her conspiracy theorist flying monkeys refuse to recognize: Tyler Robinson's grandpa gave him a rare rifle Tyler Robinson's rare rifle was found near the scene Tyler Robinson's DNA is on the weapon near the scene Tyler Robinson's DNA is at the crime scene Tyler Robinson was caught on surveillance footage arriving before and leaving after the murder Tyler Robinson wrote a letter earlier that morning to his lover outlining his plan to murder Charlie Kirk Tyler Robinson confessed to his lover Tyler Robinson confessed to his online friends Tyler Robinson confessed to his parents Tyler Robinson confessed to a family friend Tyler Robinson's lover, parents, and friends believe he is a murderer and plan to testify against him in court. But sure, do go on about Jews and Egyptian planes.

@LadyGriz Because somebody has a conscience

If Tyler Robinson is the “patsy,” then why isn't the bullet fragment a perfect match?

@Jordan_S90 There’s no footage

@2BTorr Everyone in the world—except for you. We won't show you the footage.

If Tyler Robinson doesn’t get the death penalty for shooting and killing Charlie Kirk in broad daylight in front of the world then nobody in America should ever get the death penalty again. Joke of a justice system.

@LHofflink @KanekoaTheGreat If that’s true then he must really have a neck is steal. You’re a genius

@2BTorr @KanekoaTheGreat In more tiny fragments scattered through Mr. Kirk’s body. There was no exit wound, so that means the bullet did not leave the body. (Sorry, but you asked.)

What a misleading headline from The Daily Mail. The ATF ran a tool mark analysis on a bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie's autopsy. The result was "inconclusive" — not "no match." The jacket was too fragmented to compare, which also partially explains the lack of an exit wound. The bullet shattered on impact. "Inconclusive" means insufficient evidence to draw any conclusion. It doesn't mean the bullet "did NOT match" the rifle like the headline says. The defense wants to use "inconclusive" as exculpatory evidence — but the prosecution wants to run chemical or molecular analysis comparing the jacket alloy to ammunition recovered with the gun. Unlike tool mark analysis, it doesn't require an intact bullet. The defense is trying to block that testing from happening. That's the nuance of the real story.

@Jordan_S90 Name one person

@2BTorr The entire world.

@jarbot15 There were 13 Israeli phones on campus that day.

@2BTorr Sure,,.. that’s not the issue being discussed by the Candace cults,… The are fairly claiming that this shows the bullet did not come from Tyler Robinson rifle, which is categorically false.

This is false,... The ATF was unable to confirm a ballistic match as it was only a bullet fragment not that the bullet definitively did not match. Shame on you for false reporting,....

@TheOfficerTatum Charlie was also the one stopping us from attacking Iran.

Charlie spoke against radical Islam. Why are people not questioning if they had anything to do with his death... Iran admitted to trying to kill Trump. But no one is questioning if they were somehow involved in Charlie's Assassination. Only the Jews... interesting...

@jarbot15 Inconclusive is reasonable doubt. That’s all that is needed

@AZMaGHaMaMa You should ask for the rest of the bullet too.

Okay. This is how I see it: Every single shred of evidence- testing, bullet fragment, shirt fiber, finger nail, and crowd fart should be tested in Charlie Kirk’s murder trial. Not one fucking iota of detail should be left out. Not one. NOT ONE! Fuck “Justice standards.” Justice ENDED when they shut down the rest of the suspect investigations. I want 130% certainty.

@ErikaC47 And?

🚨🤯Candace knew the bullet was SO fragmented because her “source” told her back in September!

@L8totheparty1 @KanekoaTheGreat What’s ignorant is believing there should only be a fragment remaining from a 30.06 bullet when there is no exit wound.

@2BTorr @KanekoaTheGreat 🤣Not necessary at all. Inconclusive-not leading to a firm conclusion. Not ending doubt or dispute. Maybe you should know that when working off a FRAGMENT, the results are inconclusive 50% of the time. You thinking inconclusive = no match is ignorant as hell.

@KanekoaTheGreat Inconclusive means it’s not a match. If it was a match or similar caliber, the report would say it.

@LionelNation Reasonable doubt I’d say

Case COLLAPSE? Bullet Mismatch SHATTERS Narrative in Charlie Kirk Killing—Doubt Explodes Around Tyler Robinson What once looked airtight is now unraveling fast. The bullet reportedly does not match the alleged rifle. DNA is complicated. Evidence is delayed. In a death penalty case, that is not a glitch, it is a warning. The foundation is cracking, and when the core evidence falters, everything else comes into question. This is no longer certainty, it is doubt. youtu.be/QFc_WX7YQ0g

@TheMilkBarTV Why do they only have a fragment?

Candace Owens is celebrating the Daily Mail’s misleading headline as vindication. But here she is on September 25, 2025, saying: “Regarding the bullet, the source [I wonder who that was?] says it is too fragmented to match Tyler’s rifle.” If true, this could help explain why the .30-06 bullet didn’t leave an exit wound - and would also explain why it couldn’t be matched to the rifle. But as we know, the two things Candace Owens is absolutely incapable of are consistency and honesty.

@thevivafrei Only a fragment? Where the rest of the bullet?

So they’re saying they might have misidentified the bullet? As everyone based conspiracy theories on how they think a 30–06 bullet would behave. I could have sworn I said something about the possibility of them having simply misidentified the bullet.

@Samuraijrussell travelawaits.com/2870171/best-a…

If the LDS Church has billions of dollars, claims to be led by revelation, and insists the Book of Mormon is a historical record, why hasn’t it funded a comprehensive archaeological project to prove it? Surely any credible findings would bolster its membership growth/legitimacy.

@Samuraijrussell @olseaj Exactly Samurai

@olseaj Not true. Science and archaeology can change as new discoveries emerge.

@pimomormon They made their choice to die the same day they pair of the fruit.

God said Adam and Eve would “surely die” the same day they ate the forbidden fruit. Adam and Eve almost lived (according to the Bible) for a thousand years. And we’re told that god tells the truth?

@Samuraijrussell Have you ever read the introductory page of the Book of Mormon? Here is a brief introduction: It is a record of God’s dealings with ancient inhabitants of the Americas

@2BTorr Provide citations and links to this supposed archaeological proof; I’m not talking about LDS apologetics either. There is nothing credible for the Book of Mormon.

@Samuraijrussell Ancient ruins in Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, all the way to New York.

@Samuraijrussell Any ancient ruins on the American continent is proof. The existents of Native Americans are proof.