pepper

32.4K posts

pepper banner
pepper

pepper

@2LDrPepper

old days. I’m back

Katılım Kasım 2014
1.7K Takip Edilen1.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
pepper
pepper@2LDrPepper·
“ I’m a milf “ bitch you 16
English
6
98
737
0
pepper
pepper@2LDrPepper·
@cartisburner__ I thought everyone knew they were together ? Were not they? I don’t get the surprise
English
0
0
0
141
pepper retweetledi
ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉᶰᵗᵃʳʸ John F. Kennedy Jr.
FBI KNEW THE ENTIRE PEDO NETWORK IN 2009 AND BURIED IT TO PROTECT THE DEMONS! Epstein’s own butler walks into an FBI sting trying to sell the FULL client list and victim names. He spills EVERYTHING — the operation, the elites, the kids. The FBI had it all on tape... 17 YEARS AGO. And did NOTHING. This wasn’t “incompetence.” This was the Deep State Cabal deliberately shielding their satanic child trafficking ring while real Americans got called “conspiracy theorists.” Same FBI that hunts patriots but gives the monsters a free pass.
English
605
21.3K
41.1K
881.8K
pepper retweetledi
Richard Angwin
Richard Angwin@RichardAngwin·
use the right word
Richard Angwin tweet media
English
131
10.2K
56.3K
380.4K
pepper retweetledi
Donald J. Trumpstein fake
Donald J. Trumpstein fake@realtrumpstein·
Vance in 2016: I'm never a trump guy. This video was deleted from Twitter by Elon Musk. Would be very terrible if this went viral!
English
99
4.2K
5.1K
54.5K
pepper retweetledi
Fr. James Altman
Fr. James Altman@FatherAltman·
ZUCKERBERG CATALOGUED MILLIONS OF CHILD FACES FROM FACEBOOK AND SENT THEM TO EPSTEIN/MAXWELL????? If true - and it seems so - cuff him, and throw him in Maximum Security, general population.
TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽 🎺@sxdoc

MARK ZUCKERBERG WAS JUST SUBPOENAED. Internal Meta documents recovered from the Tehran servers show that Zuckerberg personally approved $47M for a program called “Project Looking Glass” to build a private facial recognition database of every child on Instagram under the age of 14. For Epstein. He was subpoenaed Not for data leaks. Not for censorship. For Epstein. Bondi’s team found 3 wire transfers from a Meta subsidiary called “Horizon Bridge LLC” to the Butterfly Foundation — the same Epstein front company named in the Tehran files. Total: $47.2 million between 2016 and 2019. But that’s not the worst part. The worst part is what the money was for. Internal Meta documents recovered from the Tehran servers show that Zuckerberg personally approved a program called “Project Looking Glass.” Its purpose: to build a private facial recognition database of every child on Instagram under the age of 14. 12.4 million faces. Catalogued. Tagged. Sorted. And shared with a single external client: Ghislaine Maxwell. Zuckerberg’s lawyers released a statement 40 minutes ago: “Mr. Zuckerberg will cooperate fully.” That’s what they all say. Right before the handcuffs. @AXIOS4B

English
356
13.5K
31.1K
599K
pepper retweetledi
pepper retweetledi
𝓔𝓶 ♡
𝓔𝓶 ♡@emkenobi·
Girl fuck you
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez@AOC

The idea is good but the text itself was rushed and not thought through. It violated a lot of standard practices to protect survivors and due process: 1. It also released documents related to allegations found to be false or unsubstantiated, not just verified violations or settlements. So innocent people would get lumped in with violators. 2. To our knowledge, there was zero victim consent or consultation on this text. That is very different than with Epstein, where victims are centered and consulted at every step. Here, victims offered all their statements with the promise of protection and anonymity. The text gave them no way to have a voice in what information of theirs or their accounts they wanted public or keep private. That is important because… 3. Although there was a throwaway line about redacting victim names, I do believe full witness or victim statements would have been released. With the way employment at the House works (offices are small, time periods of staff employment are publicly disclosed, etc) it means that even with names redacted you can definitely track details in witness statements and use that to ID victims without their consent. And there was zero mechanism for victims themselves to assert their privacy. Originally we were supposed to debate the details of the text over two days but for some reason they rushed the vote so we couldn’t iron out any of these details to get this information properly disclosed in a way that guarantees victim safety. If the text was clean I think you’d get a lot more support. As a survivor, I know why the vast majority of women never report at all and a lot of those reasons, even if unintentionally or inadvertently, were included here. For me at least, guaranteeing the safety and agency of victims and survivors would get me to a YES.

English
41
30
583
45K